User talk:Okay,okayhshshs

Welcome!

Hello, Okay,okayhshshs, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 00:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay,okayhshshs, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Okay,okayhshshs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anne Hathaway. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Unexplained edits and deletions are disruptive Drmies (talk) 23:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise unexplained deletion at Diana Rigg.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 19:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User keeps repeatedly doing so at Anne Hathaway. -- Film Enthusiast (talk) 20:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Grace Kelly, you may be blocked from editing. Please use an edit summary and engage in talk page discussion if your edits are reverted. Unexplained removal of content, especially when other editors have asked you to stop, is disruptive editing.--Bettydaisies (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Bettydaisies (talk) 19:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pat Coombs, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — Longchess (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RacoonyRE. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jade Goody—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. RacoonyRE ^{Message me}_{Contributions} 20:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keira Knightley

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Keira Knightley, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.--Bettydaisies (talk) 21:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 19:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Charlie Brooks, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 22:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mfield (Oi!) 22:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paul O'Grady, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You must start providing edit summaries for your work per WP:EDITSUMMARY. Thanks.--Bettydaisies (talk) 20:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]