User talk:Oikoumenikos2

Franch

Hi. I have seen your recent edits to the Eva Franch i Gilabert article. Thank you for adding further sources - however, it would be helpful if you could expand some of those you have added so that they are more than bare URLs, and citations should also be added after punctuation. In editing the article, you also removed (without explanation) a paragraph regarding Franch's departure from the AA. I have reinstated this as it was reliably sourced and closes an important appointment in her career. For biographies of living people (WP:BLP), Wikipedia also favours a chronological approach (it is not a place to post résumés), presenting roles and achievements in date order, and requires that assertions are reliably sourced (two sections you created currently contain no references at all). I note parts of the newly added material also appear to be copied from Franch's Princeton University profile (link), and so may constitute a copyright violation (see WP:COPYVIO). Have a good day. Paul W (talk) 08:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul W, thanks for your edits. I will add references to the sections that need them and modify the sources that have been left as bare URLs. Thank you for reinstating the AA material. I will take a look again at it. The initial deletion was because when the article was shorter, the AA para seemed to give an over emphasis on Franch's dismissal. Thanks again! Oikoumenikos2 11:45, 29 April 2021 (EST)

Thanks for the quick response and explanation, Oikoumenikos2. IMO, if an article seems unbalanced, better to add further reliably sourced material, not to delete what's already reliably sourced. PS: you can sign off user page additions by using 4 tilde (~) symbols. Happy editing! Paul W (talk) 16:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, feel free to reach out to me via my Talk page if you have any general questions that I might help with (or use the Teahouse). Further discussion about the Eva Franch i Gilabert article should, however, take place on the article's Talk page so that other editors might also contribute. I have started one topic on that page. Paul W (talk) 16:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oikoumenikos2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Oikoumenikos2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michel Gaubert (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CommanderWaterford were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michel Gaubert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michel Gaubert, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michel Gaubert

Hello, Oikoumenikos2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michel Gaubert, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]