User talk:Ogress/Archive 47
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ogress. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 40 | ← | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:10, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Aro gTér tag team?
I added my comments on Roaring Silence as a source to the Aro gTér talk page. Also some comments at the end of the Notability section of that page regarding the editing history of some of the recent contributors. It looks to me like these people may be a sort of tag team or trying to give the appearance of a consensus for Arthur chos edits. What do you think? (also pinging @Montanabw and VictoriaGrayson:) Chris Fynn (talk) 19:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'd report them for meatpuppet or sockpuppeting if you have the time for the drama board nonsense. It's definitely what's going on. OTOH, I'm thinking it might be time to file an AfD... so which drama shall we choose? Montanabw(talk) 19:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Montanabw and CFynn:, I'm not sure which way to jump but will we actually GET people if we AfD? What we need are independent voices to scourge that page of the foolishness. I do suspect meatpuppetry and forced consensus; they tried removing tags and hiding it behind changes until I called it out. I do not understand why the false-cited material remains. I have half a mind to remove every problem citation from that page but it'll just get edit-warred back. AND they're trying to argue me into a corner on issues - the whole "our outside sources are passing footnotes" is ridiculous. Ogress smash! 17:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Go ahead and remove every problematic thing. The article is in my watchlist, so I am keeping an eye on it.VictoriaGraysonTalk 20:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Montanabw and CFynn:, I'm not sure which way to jump but will we actually GET people if we AfD? What we need are independent voices to scourge that page of the foolishness. I do suspect meatpuppetry and forced consensus; they tried removing tags and hiding it behind changes until I called it out. I do not understand why the false-cited material remains. I have half a mind to remove every problem citation from that page but it'll just get edit-warred back. AND they're trying to argue me into a corner on issues - the whole "our outside sources are passing footnotes" is ridiculous. Ogress smash! 17:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Then pick your favorite drama board and start building a case. But first, skim the ArbCom decision on Scientology - in some of these cases, people on both sides get blocked or banned in an attempt to appear "fair." But if you can show sockpuppetry and meatpuppetry, that's usually low-hanging fruit. AfD can have a lot of people, or just a few, sort of depends on the day... Montanabw(talk) 19:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Tag team strategy identified here. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 00:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
January 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chakra may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[Sanskrit]] {{IAST|cakra}}) derives from the [[Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] ''*kʷekʷlos''; its cognates
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sādhanā may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- धना}}; {{bo|t=སྒྲུབ་ཐབས་|w=sgrub thabs}}, [[THL Simplified Phonetic Transcription|THL]] ''druptap''}}), literally "a means of accomplishing something",<ref>V. S. Apte. ''A Practical Sanskrit
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Train Wreck
Why did you wreck the sources? Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 17:00, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- @ZuluPapa5: I did not wreck anything: I moved cited books into the cites as is Wikipedia standard. There is no cause to have a bibliography like that. We use cite format to list the books that are quoted in the text. As you add cited material, the bibliographical list will grow. If they aren't cited, why are they present? The page is not a sandbox for preparing material. Ogress smash! 17:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- This [1] and other say you did. The rest can be worked out in the article. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 17:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Aro gTér for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aro gTér is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aro gTér until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Montanabw(talk) 03:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Joshua Jonathan: should also take a look.VictoriaGraysonTalk 03:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)