User talk:Ogoos11

January 2022

Hello, I'm Friedlemon. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ahmad Babba Kaita seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. (See also Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons) — Friedlemon⭐^💬 11:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ahmad Babba Kaita, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. A09090091 (talk) 12:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dikko Umaru Radda moved to draftspace; add sources, add references, and kindly add categories

An article you recently created, Dikko Umaru Radda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Grabup (talk) 16:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dikko Umaru Radda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dikko Umaru Radda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://smedan.gov.ng/dgs-office/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dikko Umaru Radda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dikko Umaru Radda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dikko Umaru Radda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 22:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dikko Umaru Radda

Hello, Ogoos11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dikko Umaru Radda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dikko Umaru Radda

Hello, Ogoos11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dikko Umaru Radda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full name within article

Please, do not make use of full name/bold text within article, use only last name to refer to an individual. AbdulOlu (talk) 12:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Ahmed Bello for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Ahmed Bello is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ahmed Bello until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 12:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abubakar Sadiq Yelwa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abubakar Sadiq Yelwa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abubakar Sadiq Yelwa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Usman Musa Shugaba, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages State and Kano. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Dikko Umar Radda, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammed Mu’azu Mukaddas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammed Mu’azu Mukaddas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammed Mu’azu Mukaddas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Os ari us 15:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Argument to avoid the deletion.

This is not an argument for or against deletion at all, it's a vote. As WP:Articles for deletion states, "The debate is not a vote; please make recommendations on the course of action to be taken, sustained by arguments" and the same applies to all deletion debates. Any statement that just consists of "Keep" or "Delete" with a signature can easily be dismissed by the admin making the final decision, and changing "Keep" to "Strong keep. Ogoos11 (talk) 12:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Strong keep" because the article have a notable and reliable source to the Wikipedia page . "Keep" Ogoos11 (talk) 12:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"keep" the article because it have already improve. "keep" Ogoos11 (talk) 12:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Keep"

The article have already improve to the Wikipedia policy it has notable and reliable source. "keep" Ogoos11 (talk) 12:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yahaya Bello, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bello.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ahmed Musa Dangiwa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ahmed Musa Dangiwa. Thanks! Jamiebuba (talk) 14:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed Musa Dangiwa (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed Musa Dangiwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans (talk) 09:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ogoos11! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans (talk) 09:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suleiman Bakari moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Suleiman Bakari. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 22:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suleiman Bakari (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suleiman Bakari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 23:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmed Musa Dangiwa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Ahmed Bello

Hello, Ogoos11,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Ibjaja055 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Muhammad Ahmed Bello, for deletion, because [consensus decision] previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ibjaja055}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 22:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

The article have a Wikipedia notability it has a reliable source Ogoos11 (talk) 23:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ogoos11. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 03:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Suleiman Bakari

Hello, Ogoos11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Suleiman Bakari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]