User talk:Oggi1321

March 2022

Hello, I'm SQGibbon. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bella Taylor Smith, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 04:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Brandon Jenner. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tymewalk (talk) 05:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alli Simpson

The article Alli Simpson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 06:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alli Simpson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alli Simpson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alli Simpson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WWGB (talk) 01:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sabre Norris

The article Sabre Norris has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 01:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sabre Norris

The article Sabre Norris has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. QueenofBithynia (talk) 10:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sabre Norris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabre Norris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabre Norris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alli Simpson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Any addition to a biography of a living person—including but not limited to date of birth and height—must be backed up with reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 12:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brandon Jenner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linda Thompson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Imogen Anthony

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Imogen Anthony requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imogen Anthony moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Imogen Anthony, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 03:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Alli Simpson, you may be blocked from editing. You did not add a reliable source, so you may not add a date of birth. —C.Fred (talk) 02:58, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leah Felder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malibu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information, especially about personal life, must be sourced

I have reverted your edits to Jess Eva, particularly the Personal life section, because you failed to provide a reliable source. Further, children's names are normally omitted from articles unless the children themselves are notable. —C.Fred (talk) 11:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Em Rusciano. If you add a date of birth or place of birth again without providing a reliable source for it, you are subject to being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 12:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop it

If you cannot abide by the rules of Wikipedia, go and find another platform to play on. Stolen photos, unsourced information, ..... WWGB (talk) 12:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the photo you added of Abbie Chatfield

Please advise which of the two situations apply:

You acknowledge that the image is not your own, and it must be removed as a copyright violation.
You assert that the image is your own and that you have a conflict of interest with Chatfield, in which case you must also disclose that relationship. Further, if you have been paid to edit her article or any other article, you must disclose who is paying you.

I strongly suggest that you respond. If you continue to make unsourced or copyright-infringing edits without replying, we will just assume intent to disrupt and proceed along those lines. —C.Fred (talk) 17:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oggi1321, When it comes to BLPs, editors often only get one chance to modify their editing to conform with WP:BLP and WP:RS when they have failed to communicate with other editors. In the majority of cases, the next block is indefinite.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chantel (musical artist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chantel (musical artist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 15:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerry Coleby-Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced dates of birth revisited

I reverted your edit to Jesse Hooper because you added a date of birth but failed to add a source. What part of the requirement to cite a reliable source do you find unclear? —C.Fred (talk) 12:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of unsourced personal information to biography articles and a complete failure to communicate with other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:11, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oggi1321. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 13:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Imogen Anthony

Hello, Oggi1321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Imogen Anthony, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Imogen Anthony

Hello, Oggi1321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Imogen Anthony".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:22, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chantel (musical artist)

Hello, Oggi1321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chantel (musical artist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chantel (musical artist)

Hello, Oggi1321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chantel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]