User talk:Oficialtowhid

{{unblock|I did many mistakes and I admit them. I was new at that time but now I am ready to contribute to Wikipedia. I was blocked from adding promotional content to Wikipedia. And at that time I don't have any idea about that. I am really sorry for that. But I want to contribute to Wikipedia now so Please unblock me. I will adhere to WP:COI and I will contribute to Religious articles or Islamic articles. I want to contribute at Wikipedia. And i'm not a paid author at all. In first place, I wanted to write about my organization without knowing the violation acts. I won't do that again. . I hope this blocking will be considered. Also I will disclose my other accounts with reasons.}}

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oficialtowhid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Tow1020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I did many mistakes and I admit them. I was new at that time but now I am ready to contribute to Wikipedia. I was blocked from adding promotional content to Wikipedia. And at that time I don't have any idea about that. I am really sorry for that. But I want to contribute to Wikipedia now so Please unblock me. I will adhere to WP:COI and I will contribute to Religious articles or Islamic articles. I want to contribute at Wikipedia. And i'm not a paid author at all. In first place, I wanted to write about my organization without knowing the violation acts. I won't do that again. . I hope this blocking will be considered. Also I will disclose my other accounts with reasons.

Decline reason:

You say your organization - are you an employee, a director, do you own the company? It sounds to me that you are a paid editor. Also, you haven't addressed your abuse of multiple accounts, other than to say you will disclose your other accounts with reasons. I suggest you do that in your next unblock request. You need to convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked. In order to do that you need to be more specific about what you did wrong and what you will do differently in future. PhilKnight (talk) 18:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oficialtowhid, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Oficialtowhid! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Oficialtowhid, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ravensfire (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

October 2020

Hello Oficialtowhid. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Oficialtowhid. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Oficialtowhid|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Ravensfire (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get money for any edits. I just edit which are required to edit and I know people pay money for Wikipedia page. But no one has ever paid me money. Hope you understand. Oficialtowhid (talk) 15:11, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oficialtowhid, I'm glad to hear that. Ravensfire (talk) 16:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajesh Kumar (youtuber) (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajesh Kumar (youtuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rajesh Kumar (youtuber), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 08:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... Please also review these 2 articles... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nischay_Malhan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ashish_Chanchlani

Oficialtowhid (talk) 09:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashish Chanchlani (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

too much hyperbole, we just need dry facts please

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashish Chanchlani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ashish Chanchlani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review the article again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ashish_Chanchlani Oficialtowhid (talk) 12:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ashish Chanchlani has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ashish Chanchlani. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the problem. Review again brother! Oficialtowhid (talk) 13:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashish Chanchlani (October 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Given the two recent AFDs and mainspace deletions, I don't see any change or reason to believe this person has magically become notable. This is just WP:TE at this point.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content

Please stop adding unsourced biographical content as you did at Draft:Nischay Malhan and elsewhere. Content about living people needs to be impeccably sourced, not pulled out of thin air or from your personal knowledge of the subject. See WP:BLP for guidance. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Rajesh Kumar (youtuber)

Draft:Rajesh Kumar (youtuber), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rajesh Kumar (youtuber) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Rajesh Kumar (youtuber) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 17:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nischay Malhan (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dylsss was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The first reference is self-published and not independent. Social Blade is simply a social media statistics website, is does not show significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nischay Malhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nischay Malhan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dylsss^{(talk • contribs)} 21:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Towhid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mohammad Towhid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. YODADICAE👽 15:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hi Oficialtowhid! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at CNN-News18 that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Ravensfire (talk) 22:35, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Towhid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mohammad Towhid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... ( What is wrong here in my user page??) --Oficialtowhid (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Deb (talk) 13:58, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No this is my user name My name is Mohammad Towhid so I want to use officialtowhid but it was not available so i have to choose oficialtowhid.. and where did I promoted any business?? I didn't promoted any business. Oficialtowhid (talk) 15:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock-spamun|tow1020|I am really sorry I was new to wikipedia that time, That is why I did mistakes. Next time I will not do it again and I will not promote anything on Wikipedia}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oficialtowhid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did many mistakes and I admit them. I was new that time but now I am ready to contribute to Wikipedia. I was blocked for adding promotional content to Wikipedia. And at that time I don't have any idea about that. I am really sorry for that. But I want to contribute to Wikipedia now so Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

You still haven't told us how you would adhere to WP:COI and what you'd write about instead. Please stop and take the time to read and understand the policies we've linked you to. Yamla (talk) 14:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hu Towhid7864 (talk) 14:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nischay Malhan

Hello, Oficialtowhid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nischay Malhan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 07:14, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oficialtowhid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please Unblock me, I want to contribute on Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oficialtowhid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what i have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, .

Decline reason:

You need to not just repeat our words back to us. Please demonstrate your understanding by telling us what you have done wrong, how you will not do it again, and tell the productive contributions you will make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|I did many mistakes and I admit them. I was new at that time but now I am ready to contribute to Wikipedia. I was blocked from adding promotional content to Wikipedia. And at that time I don't have any idea about that. I am really sorry for that. But I want to contribute to Wikipedia now so Please unblock me. I will adhere to WP:COI and I will contribute to Religious articles or Islamic articles please unblock me. }}

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oficialtowhid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

tow1020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am really sorry I was new to wikipedia that time, That is why I did mistakes. Next time I will not do it again and I will not promote anything on Wikipedia

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon I will not create any other account. I will use this account. At that time I don't have any knowledge of Wikipedia. But at this time I realize most of things. And I will not do it again. And I will disclose my other accounts with reason. Thanks Oficialtowhid (talk) 15:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to be listening, admins are telling you what you need to do...disclose your other accounts (right here, right now) and explain how you will avoid conflict-of-interest editing in the future. Be specific, just don't repeat our words right back to us.

Most editors are not allowed to make this many unblock requests without losing their talk page access. So, consider your words, seriously write your next one (it would help if you actually read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks first), answer the questions that admins are asking you, because it is likely to be your last chance before your talk page access is removed. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nischay Malhan

Hello, Oficialtowhid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nischay Malhan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]