User talk:Oe2k

Speedy deletion of FTS Software

A tag has been placed on FTS Software requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JavaTenor (talk) 11:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not Delete the page it is imformative like our competitors

Aradial Technologies is a company that provides one of the top 3 AAA on the market. Our competitors are all appearing in similar fashion on the Wifi. See: Alepo, Elitecore, Amdocs, etc Feel free to mark it as a commercial company like the others. But please do not remove the page, unless you will be fair and remove also the competitors!

Thank you.

Aradial Technologies

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Aradial Technologies, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mitzmara.com/Aradial.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FTS Software

Hello - I saw the note you left on User:JavaTenor's talk page, and I'm afraid you might be under a serious misconception about what Wikipedia is. It is not a business directory in which companies may "register"; rather, it is an encyclopedia that anybody can edit, with the theory being that a large enough number of editors will eventually form consensus on the ideal form for any article.
Like any encyclopedia, Wikipedia is somewhat selective on what it will have articles about (although unlike most other encyclopedias, Wikipedia is not constrained by book size - since it's electronic - or writer costs - since Wikipedia writers are volunteers). The primary discriminant for determining whether Wikipedia will have an article on a subject is notability. For a company like FTS Software to have an article on Wikipedia, it must demonstrate that it meets Wikipedia's notability standards for corporations. Even if it does meet these standards, its article must be written from a neutral point of view (meaning no advertising copy). You could attempt to rewrite the FTS article in such a way that it demonstrated notability and was written neutrally, but I have to tell you that my impression is that it's simply not a notable enough company to have a Wikipedia article, and any subsequent attempt you made would probably be deleted in the same way as your first was.
I hope this cleared up a few things; if you have any questions about this or any other aspect of Wikipedia, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 14:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Aradial-newlogo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Aradial-newlogo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aradial

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aradial requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Katherine (talk) 14:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aradial-newlogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aradial-newlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 14:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aradial

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aradial, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dewritech (talk) 21:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aradial Technologies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aradial Technologies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. SFK2 (talk) 13:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SFK2 - why our competitors are allowed page and you always remove ours?

Alepo Elitecore Amdocs Allot

all have similar pages on Wifi - why are you picking on us?!

Speedy deletion nomination of Aradial technolgies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aradial technolgies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk) 13:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your actions are highly disruptive and could warrant a block - please see WP:POINTY and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. -SFK2 (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aradial technolgies

A tag has been placed on Aradial technolgies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page, or a redirect loop.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. G S Palmer (talk) 16:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aradial Technologies

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Aradial Technologies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. G S Palmer (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aradial Technologies

Hello Oe2k,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aradial Technologies for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 15:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Aradial New.png

Thanks for uploading File:Aradial New.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aradial for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aradial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aradial until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FuriouslySerene (talk) 19:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

==============

Why did you Aradial - it is a company like Aptilo, Alepo, Amdocs and entitled to be on Wikipidia! why arent you removing these (also were referenced in our publication).

We also paid continuations to Wikipedia, I see this is a monopoly with unfair.

Orphaned non-free image File:Aradial New.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aradial New.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article Aradial. Wikipedia is not the Yellow pages. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

==

What I wrote was not for selling just for information! you can remove all the Yellow pages stuff if you have.

Why didn't you remove the following any of commercial sites, our competitors! it is a company like Aptilo, Amdocs, comverse, Xura , Bridgewater, Cisco, Cyberoam, and entitled to be on Wikipidia! why arent you removing these (also were referenced in our publication).???

We also paid continuations to Wikipedia, I see this is a monopoly and dedicatory with unfair and behaviour.

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Elockid ^{Message me} 15:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oe2k (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What I wrote was not for selling just for information! you can remove all the Yellow pages stuff if you have. The page was maintained and viewed by many of your edirors as well they fix stuff. Why didn't you remove the following any of commercial sites, our competitors! it is a company like Aptilo, Amdocs, comverse, Xura , Bridgewater, Cisco, Cyberoam, and entitled to be on Wikipedia! why arent you removing these (also were referenced in our publication). We also paid continuations to Wikipedia and we liked the idea, I see this is a unfair behaviour to us.

Decline reason:

Please read WP:ADVERT and WP:COI, then find somewhere else to advertise your non-notable company. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.