User talk:Odejea

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 12:01, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Majorca

Could you have a look at Talk:Kingdom of Majorca? Someone apparently is doubting the coat of arms you placed there. - Jmabel | Talk 05:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philip I of Taranto

You've created Image:Armoiries Anjou Constantinople.png for his coat of arms during his first marriage, but I've just read an article in JSTOR (Gerola, G. The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs (1928) 53 288, 293–295) which describes an enamelled casket once owned by the couple. The arms of Thamar are described as "a double-headed eagle or upon a field gules", rather than the Imperial device in the figure you've made. You may wish to correct it to conform to this historical example. Best wishes, and thanks for all your fine work making coats of arms. Choess 01:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another minor note: looking at the illustration of the casket, the label is placed over the bend, not vice-versa. Yours, Choess 03:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blazons

Hi, nice idea to insert blazons into succession boxes, but this makes them too big. It still keeps in limits if it is only a box, it gets ugly at more. Furthermore on some pages you have inserted a blazon, one exists already, doubleing them is unnecessary. Greetings ~~ Phoe _talk 00:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~ [reply]

Hi, me again. Would you please use 125px instead of 200px, if you insert blazons. The latter makes them too big, in some cases bigger than the hole text. Merci et beaucoup de salutations ~~ Phoe _talk 21:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC) ~~ [reply]

Bonjour ami! Would it please you to assist Wikipedia, through my suggestion?

Mary I of England needs treatment. This page is the only one I have found showing her combined arms with Philip of Spain. If you could make a graphic for her article, it may help people see more of Angleterre's Jesuit history. I would like to add that I am very pleased to see a French person interested in Anglo-French relations, even if just historical. By the way, there are some people who dispute Jean de Gand ever quartering his arms with those of le Royaume de Castile-et-Leon. Do you like this page? Here is a special treat you would really love!

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Rhode Islander 03:12, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup mon ami! I hope and trust, that there was no offence given, in my presentation of Catholique symbols before you. In fact, I would enjoy the reconnaissance of your reception. Please reply, if it so pleases your gracious editorial benefactor's will. Rhode Islander 23:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For you...

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		Your work got me started on armorials, and you deserve most of the credit for a lot of the images I've uploaded. Thank you. -- I. Pankonin (t/c) 08:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coats of Arms

Hello, good work on the Arms for the Templar Grand Masters! Do you have the Arms for the later masters as well? That would be great, keep up the good work! --Tefalstar (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Armenian Cilicia Coat of Arms

Hello, why have you changed the Rupenids coat of arms on the italian wikipedia? There are no differences between Rupenids and Hetumids coats of arms? (Sorry, my english is poor and my french is worse). Bye. Franco aq (talk) 09:23, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

answer at it:Discussioni utente:Franco aq. Odejea (talk) 10:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polish Wikipedia

Hello, I've translated the sentence on your user page on Polish Wikipedia :) . TR (my talk) 19:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Odejea. You have new messages at Talk:Sigebert IV.
Message added Loremaster (talk) 07:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Odejea. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Odejea. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]