Jump to content

User talk:OccultZone/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10

QPQ

Please see Wikipedia:Did you know#Review requirement. They started this system over a year ago to ensure that the long list of DYK nominations would be reviewed in a timely manner. Anyone with over 5 DYK credits is required to review another nomination before his hook is approved.

By the way, as you write more articles, you may want to add something to your user page so your name shows up blue instead of red. There's a fun selection of userboxes out there. Best, Yoninah (talk) 21:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your precious advice. OccultZone (Talk) 00:39, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Child sexual abuse in Australia

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion for Bonsal Unified

Hello, I am interested why you flagged my article for speedy deletion. It was just an effort to expand coverage of the San Diego educational systems on wikipedia. I am part of WikiProject San Diego and just trying to do my part. Also, how would this be deemed promotional? It is a school district. Ghostkrashers (talk) 03:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

@Ghostkrashers:, only 1 reference, which is WP:PRIMARYSOURCE. OccultZone (Talk) 03:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
I have added a secondary source. Ghostkrashers (talk) 04:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
PROD tag removed, have fun. OccultZone (Talk) 04:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Resolved

Dear OccultZone

I would like to know how you thought a listing for a gallery with links is an advertisement? As you can see if you read the article, it is listed as one of the main galleries in Iran. It is also the first in the country to be designed as a gallery space. I would urge you to reconsider this, as I just put a lot of work to highlight galleries in Tehran, how about you send me a message at first listing the problems you have for the page, as you haven't listed any? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigabdul (talk • contribs) 11:46, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

@Bigabdul: Whenever a single user happens to make the pages that are related to an organization, relatively large(for new page), but include only one source which is primary, it can be easily deemed as promotional. I don't know anyone who contributed to this page, nor I know about any of the associates related with the gallery. OccultZone (Talk) 11:53, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Occult Zone, how can more than one user in its first hour of creation create a page? I have to be someone to start off the proceedure do I not? Then as time progresses more people alter the page? I have added other links now so can you please remove the deletion of the page, I am attempting to show Iran does have a cultural scene and a vibrant one at that. I do not work for the gallery and as you can see from my previous posts I am editing many areas around Tehran. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigabdul (talk • contribs) 11:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

@Bigabdul: Tag removed. Check how I have added references, I had added one more reference to the article. OccultZone (Talk) 12:16, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Join us!

Hello OccultZone! Thank you for your contributions.
If you would be interested in joining a group of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, please take a look at the Military history WikiProject—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please sign your name here, and a project coordinator will soon be along with a formal welcome. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 03:21, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
@Peacemaker67: Thanks! I am there :) OccultZone (Talk) 03:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, OccultZone. You have new messages at Lixxx235's talk page.
Message added 03:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lixxx235 (talk) 03:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, OccultZone. You have new messages at Lixxx235's talk page.
Message added 03:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lixxx235 (talk) 03:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 06:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Winslow School, Tyngsborough

Hello OccultZone. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Winslow School, Tyngsborough to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:42, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Edits to Dixon Hearne page

Hi I have made some changes to the Dixon Hearne page. I added more secondary sources, lists of publications and honors and awards (to prove notability), as well as a longer list of external links. I haven't yet found articles I can link this one to, but I will do that soon if you think what I've done so far clears up some of the issues you mentioned earlier. Thanks!!! Literaryuser (talk) 11:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Mabalu. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pakdam Pakdai, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Mabalu (talk) 17:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

The review was obviously a side effect of the speedy deletion nomination. I have done some basic editing but unreviewed it again for others to have a look and see what they think. Mabalu (talk) 17:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
@Mabalu: reviewed? Check again, I wanted that page to be deleted. OccultZone (Talk) 17:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
That's what I said, "obviously a side effect of the speedy deletion nomination" as above. Every time someone tags a page for deletion or adds tags using the Curation tool, it automatically marks the page as reviewed. Winds me up too... I am always unreviewing pages after tagging them. Mabalu (talk) 17:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
@Mabalu: something should be done about it. If prod template have been removed, it should become unreviewed. Keep up your good work. OccultZone (Talk) 03:30, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Suzannah_Lipscomb

updated - please reconsider

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Suzannah_Lipscomb

Mosfetfaser (talk) 19:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

I had already voted. OccultZone (Talk) 02:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Why are you now undoing the subject's date of birth and middle names? (Lw1982 (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC))

You are edit warring, it will be later reviewed whether the edits were correct or not. OccultZone (Talk) 15:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Not edit warring if I'm adding new sourced info. You are removing changes for the sake of it (Lw1982 (talk) 15:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC))

You did broke the 3 revert rule. OccultZone (Talk) 03:38, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Why this edit warring? Dr. Lipscomb is not know professionally by her two middle names? seems personal Thewho515 (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

@Thewho515: about 2 of the editors have taken subject too seriously, I've no idea about them. OccultZone (Talk) 07:26, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Possible Deletetion jamie/plunkett

Resolved

What do i need to do to cite this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jplunk67 (talk • contribs) 10:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

@Jplunk67: You had to add at least one source in the article. I have done that, article has been approved. OccultZone (Talk) 10:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

AfD

Thanks for mentioning the misspelling. The image appears to be one grabbed the writer took from an random article, with the article content from Neapope. I doubt the image belongs to Neapope. LionMans Account (talk) 03:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Innerview

Hi. I've declined your speedy request as A9 is not appropriate for this article. A9 only applies when a recording is not notable (I pass no comment on this album) AND the artistes are not the subject of an article. In this case, there's been an article on them since about 2005. A9 is unusual at CSD in that two criteria must be met. If you feel that notability isn't shown, there's always WP:PROD or WP:AFD. There's no speedy suitable for it. Peridon (talk) 11:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

@Peridon: I have no comment on this, AFD is the way to go, but before that I will search about this subject once more. OccultZone (Talk) 11:26, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Afd has been created, posted on your page. OccultZone (Talk) 17:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

1188 etc

Resolved

Comments noted - I'm copying your lead and adding it to any articles. Sarah777 (talk) 23:30, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

@Sarah777: That's good, I will be assessing projects and adding more projects to the talk page of these articles. It is just a notification that your watchlist may get triggered. Have fun. OccultZone (Talk) 04:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Regarding references...they are in the wikilinks. These "year-in" articles are a gathering of dated facts from other Wikipedia articles. Regards Sarah777 (talk) 21:20, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
@Sarah777: I never disturbed or objected any reference related issue. Although I really think that every entry should have reference. You can do it, or maybe I will have to do it someday. OccultZone (Talk) 02:12, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm trying to complete as much of the series as I can find "events" to record. I'll copy in the references after that. Regards Sarah777 (talk) 12:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
@Sarah777: Yes you can. I've checked that there were WP:AFD concerning these articles before, and they got crashed. I would just say that article will remain anyhow and someday we shall need similar articles for every country. OccultZone (Talk) 12:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Agreed. That will be one big job! I've been years working on and off on just the Ireland series...Sarah777 (talk) 12:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Western Pacific Production

Resolved

I was about to take this to AfD when I saw your edits at Prashant Passy Pilley. Did you noticed that one of the links on that page is [1] about someone getting 5 years in jail in 1993? I'm very dubious about the BLP, more so about the company. See[2] - do you believe all that? I looked up Tim Conrad (correct spelling), can't find anything linking him to WPP. A search for "Bond 24" and "Western Pacific Production" turns up only that web page. Dougweller (talk) 13:15, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

@Dougweller:, when I had reviewed this article I had found more than 80,000 results of this name. I had clean up, check [3], it was my last version. Now that article is dominated by its creator, it will be pretty harder for me to collaborate with the creator right now but it can be done anytime. The company you are talking about, Western Pacific is not the best source, I have commented on its Afd. OccultZone (Talk) 13:30, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Odd. I get "about 28,900" yet when I click on the last page I end up with 27. Try again searching on his name, and start clicking through the pages. Something is odd with Google. See Bing: [4]. He worked on Supernatural, but [5] lists him as just one of many, working on 2 episodes. I'm taking him to AfD also on the basis of those searches. Dougweller (talk) 13:50, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
I will be waiting for that. OccultZone (Talk) 13:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
It seemed sensible to bundle them as this is just the start of the AfD and they are by the same editor. You might want to comment again. Dougweller (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 Done and thanks. OccultZone (Talk) 14:09, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Denise Donnelly

Resolved

Hi OccultZone. I saw your comment in the deletion discussion of this article and the link you included. I wasn't clear if with the link you were indicating that coverage in that book establishes notability or if you were pointing to the citations already supporting that bit along with the recently added book citation? And another editor has responded that the book does not cover her in depth (I haven't looked into it). Could you please clarify? Thanks. Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

@Candleabracadabra: I have replied there. If you have questions, reply me here. OccultZone (Talk) 12:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Resolved

Thank you for reviewing.Vin09 (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

One more review required

Pls review this article List of villages and mandals in Krishna district.Vin09 (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

@Vin09:  Done OccultZone (Talk) 06:34, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Help

Resolved

Can you please check why these pages have an editor's signature and remove it if not needed? Also check if there has been any vandalism in these pages.

Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 07:47, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

@Magioladitis: Removed signatures, and notified all 4/4 editors that they should not add signature on main article pages. OccultZone (Talk) 07:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I have a great project for you (I believe). You can use AWB and start fixing Category:Infobox book image param needs updating by using plain filenames in |image= instead of full file assignments. Example. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes that's a good one. So from when I can start? OccultZone (Talk) 11:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
When you like. Is there any problem with your AWB access? -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Sure :=) and there is no problem, I was just doing a large number of pages that should be done manually, and still do. OccultZone (Talk) 11:28, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Perfect. Just put a more descriptive edit summary to avoid complains. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Page review

Resolved

Page waiting for review from long time. Can you?Vin09 (talk) 11:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

@Vin09: Which one? Your last page(about Krishna district) was reviewed, that was hours ago, check my log. OccultZone (Talk) 11:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
sorry i did not mention the name. here it is Lord Narasimha temple, Mangalagiri. Vin09 (talk) 11:30, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
It was probably another editor who reviewed that one. I have just removed the 'unreviewed' template. OccultZone (Talk) 11:33, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Need help

Resolved

hi, I've renamed Category:Lists of cities in India to Category:List of cities in India, is it correct? as after renaming i saw there are many pages with heading written as "Lists" instead of "list".Vin09 (talk) 16:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

@Vin09: It is correct, just replace the old title with the new title, wherever they were added. OccultZone (Talk) 17:01, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
ok--Vin09 (talk) 17:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Why?

Hi OccultZone! I still don't understand why you edited my corrections regarding the article about Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. The lines about corruption and criticism are very unreliable; for example: Varga Llosa is a well known figure who has been historically negative of the Argentine governments, specially post 90's. And the other 4 links correspond all to the Economist, a source which has never said one good thing about Kirchner and has praised the economic policy of the disastrous IMF in Argentina (which led to the crisis in 2001).

I think it should be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AgustinArgentina (talk • contribs) 17:49, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

@AgustinArgentina: Best place for raising such issues would be Talk:Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, you cannot remove the whole part but you can provide explanation on the talk page. I think that there should be some notable criticism of Kirchner's regime on the leading paragraph even if you think that Varga Llosa is not proper source. OccultZone (Talk) 17:54, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
You really show up literally everywhere I look. Everywhere. I really can't not give a barnstar for that. Congrats! Lixxx235 (talk) 04:22, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! OccultZone (Talk) 04:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
for your help in many aspects Vin09 (talk) 06:07, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! OccultZone (Talk) 06:10, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Kozhikode page

Resolved

Hi, on Kozhikode#Shopping_Malls page the shopping malls info is looking like too much promotional for private organizations. What should be done? Need help. And also, i want to know if private schools and colleges info can be added to any city or only the main important universities is enough, as i encountered several pages promoting private schools and forming the page like a directory. ThanksVin09 (talk) 06:12, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

@Vin09: If they play important role, they should be added. But I had some sort of discussion previously, only those things can remain unchallenged that have wikipedia page. It is good that you've informed me about the section of Kozhikode' Shopping Malls, I have cleaned it up. OccultZone (Talk) 06:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion for Sinhgad College of Commerce

Hello, I am interested why you flagged my article for speedy deletion. Also, how would this be deemed promotional? It is a education institute working under Pune University(Government University). I think the page should not be deleted or marked for Speedy deletion. --Prasadgavhane (talk) 08:06, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

@Prasadgavhane: Article is supported by primary sources. You should address that how your subject is, Notable(referred by third party sources) or it has some type of prevalence. If it is related to any type of notable person who has a page on wikipedia, you can let me know. OccultZone (Talk) 08:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

I have some more sources. I hope these sources will help you.[6][7][8]Prasadgavhane (talk) 10:52, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

@Prasadgavhane: I have removed the WP:PROD tag for now, but you should add more reliable sources to the article, or else I will a Afd. Thanks OccultZone (Talk) 16:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Ronnie Hudson - Westcoastin'

Resolved

Hello, I saw you tagged all that flag thing in my page. Ronnie Hudson page has been created with reliable sources, thank you, now revert your edits please.

--OGmuthafkkinDoc (talk) 10:33, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Good that you created Ronnie Hudson, tag removed. Happy editing. OccultZone (Talk) 10:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Westcoastin'

Resolved

Hello OccultZone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Westcoastin', a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Artist now has article - Ronnie Hudson - which may be an WP:AfD candidate. Let's start there first. . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 10:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

@Shirt58: I think I had declined it myself, check[9] Author had notified about it, few minutes before you would edit the page, I was just reviewing the page of Ronnie Hudson. OccultZone (Talk) 10:50, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry about the templated message! For me assessments of "speedy" deletion involves checking for non-English language sources, checking Google's scanned newspaper archives, seeing whether LA Weekly has an article, and if so is a reliable source, and if so is a blog is a reliable source, going to check how dinner is cooking... by the time I'm ready to put forward a tentative opinion the article is usually either OK'd or deleted anyway! Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:03, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
@Shirt58: over 60,000 results concerning this artist. I think that more can be written, we can help the editor. At this moment, the article has maintenance tags. If article has been brought to Afd and some user happens to discover 1-2 or more reliable sources, it will end up with a speedy keep. OccultZone (Talk) 11:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Census info

Resolved

For every 10 years Indian population is released by the government. People are updating it for yearly basis on certain town pages. Is is correct because in my opinion its not genuine which is expectations released by the press. Also, based on the genuine stats the city rankings are based, users are simply updating assumed stats and changing their city rankings which are based on population. Hyderabad - a featured article of wiki is a genuine page which has 2011 census, but other small towns and cities are simply changed by users.Vin09 (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

National consensus should be the source for these types of information, and it should match with the source. You can also use the 1991 consensus, but you have to specifically refer about the year. OccultZone (Talk) 17:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Why?

Resolved

I am just curious - why did you do this edit? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philip_Delano&diff=601628841&oldid=591082297

The references were fine the way they were. All you did was transpose the order of references. Is their some new guideline I'm not aware of? Mugginsx (talk) 20:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

@Mugginsx: That was months ago. If you watch properly not just reference order was maintained on that edit, but few white spaces and blank lines were removed. Those days I usually had 1 or 2 options of WP:AWB disabled but still did many changes as these articles were hardly ever edited. Later I had to disable more for avoiding less effective changes. OccultZone (Talk) 22:33, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Ok, reference order in that case was already maintained by virtue of the way they were originally formatted and your reversing the order of them made no difference. example: [1] will always go to the primary reference by virtue of a letter or number on the primary reference. The extra spaces do not normally show up in the editing processes. Again I see no difference. Sometimes, the reason there are no changes made is because they are not needed. I always appreciate valid corrections to my articles, but in this case, there was no need for them. Mugginsx (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
@Mugginsx: Pretty much. But like I said, that was months ago. It's been a long time that I don't make those edits anymore. OccultZone (Talk) 12:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
OK, that's fine. Mugginsx (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Help

Resolved

Info needed on categories : What is the difference between Category:Districts of India and Category:Districts of India by name. Also, have your word on Hyderabad talk page on a discussion regarding categories.Vin09 (talk) 04:48, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

No difference at all. Either any one of them should be used on a single page. Not both. That is all I have to say on this matter. You can let me know about the outcome of the discussion that you are having on the page of Hyderabad. If there are disagreements, we shall bring it to the main noticeboard of category. Happy editing. OccultZone (Talk) 04:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes, there is a disagreement from one user stating some examples of FA status page, don't know which is correct, the disagreement states : there should not be any regional categories like cities in a <region> but FA pages do have in his examples.Vin09 (talk) 05:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
What is the name of the user? I know that according to WP:Others, rest of the pages cannot be excuse for carrying out any different pattern of editing. OccultZone (Talk) 05:02, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
user:Omer123hussainVin09 (talk) 05:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Got the right link now, it is actually WP:OTHERSTUFF. If you are done of debating on the page of Hyderabad, you can edit rest of the pages. But if you are in hurry, considering opening a new section on Wikipedia talk:Categorization and notify other user as well. OccultZone (Talk) 05:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

List portal

Resolved

Any reason you are adding "List" portal to many category pages, e.g. here? Seems totally irrelevant... Fram (talk) 09:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

@Fram: Its pages(1805 in Wales, 1806 in Wales) do have these projects. But yes I can drop the idea of adding "list" if you want so. I had actually confirmed this idea from other editor before I would make it, it was uncontroversial. I did only on 5 pages. OccultZone (Talk) 09:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes, because you added them in the first place (at the top, as first project, instead of the polite at the bottom). The link between these categories and that project is strenuous at best (unless you want to add every category to the project?) But a lot worse is that portal Lists has nothing to do with Project Lists. Please check what you add before mass adding things like this. Your link goes to Portal:Contents/Portals. Fram (talk) 09:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Correct, that's why I had stopped editing that one after I did about 5. So I could see what others would be thinking. It is good enough with the projects and other portal(such as history). I would have added the "Years" portal, but there is none. @Fram: is there any possibility that I can create a portal for "Years"? OccultZone (Talk) 09:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
I don't think you need permission. I have worked with portals years back ("Belgium" and "Comics" mainly), but I no longer see the purpose in them, they take away much time and energy that can be much better spent editing articles IMO. I don't know of any portals that actually give any real benefit for readers or editors. But that is just my opinion, I don't think there is a policy that would stop you creating one. Perhaps check with wikiproject portals, if such a thing exists? Fram (talk) 09:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes I had and it doesn't exist. I got my answer, yes a lot better things can be done, I got about 100s of articles to write, concerning history and social issues, but sometimes I think about making rest of the things better. Just like many of our editors try to. OccultZone (Talk) 09:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I removed another 11 instances where you added the List portal to a category. By the way, perhaps you already know this, but if you create new year in country cats, you can use much simpler syntax now; compare these two: I removed the List portal, but apart from that, these give the exaft same result, but the newer Template:Year in country category one is much easier (to use and to comprehend) than the old "year by category" template. No need to convert existing ones, normally, since it doesn't improve the end result, but for new ones you may like to consider using it. It is already used on some 6,000 pages. Fram (talk) 10:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes and I removed the remaining one. This one sounds more simplified than other one. Maybe whenever these categories would be edited, I will just replace with the above code, so there will be multiple changes to the page. OccultZone (Talk) 10:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Aam Aadmi Party (Pakistan)

Resolved

Dear AccultZone, May I request you to upload AAP's flag and my picture:Arslan Ul Mulk to AAP's page. Please visit AAP's official facebook page www.facebook.com/PakAmmAdmiParty to get these images. I shall be Obliged. Sincerely: Arslan Ul Mulk ,Party Chairman,Aam Aadmi Party (Pakistan). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arslanmulk (talk • contribs) 18:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

@Arslanmulk: I don't think they will allow, it is considered as copyright infringement if I will copy the image. OccultZone (Talk) 18:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Merge proposal view

Resolved

Hi, occult zone need your view on Talk:Transportation_in_Guntur page. It's been pending since long time.--Vin09 (talk) 05:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

@Vin09: I will comment. OccultZone (Talk) 05:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for help with Drafting film!

That's all. ☺ Kragen Javier Sitaker (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

GA question

Resolved

As you are active there. I would like to ask if protected(from IP) article can be nominated for GA? Ping me. OccultZone (Talk) 11:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes it can. A number of high profile and/or sensitive articles are IP protected; they remain open to all other aspects of Wikipedia editing, including GAN and FAC. SilkTork ✔Tea time 14:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
@SilkTork: You had a typo[10], "talpgae". OccultZone (Talk) 15:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

You can have your own bowl! Thanks for participating in the various discussions! Magioladitis (talk) 16:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! I will keep it up :=) OccultZone (Talk) 16:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for self-reverting on the AWB page. I should have explained my edit more clearly initially. Andrew327 11:03, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

@Andrewman327: Always :=) and keep up your constructive editing. OccultZone (Talk) 11:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

awb edits

Resolved

I've noticed a pattern where it seems you just click save instead of fixing some problems. Songbyrd (TV Series) is an example. With this edit you did clean out an problematic plain list, but it is now empty an should have been removed. The state the article was in before you arrived shows a broken ref and no reflist. Those errors do show up in AWB's alert box. Those errors showed up on the checkwiki lists which is how I arrived at the article. Not everything can be fixed in every article, but if you fix what you can, it saves others from spending time going back and fixing them. Bgwhite (talk) 08:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

@Bgwhite: Good catch here, and thanks. If I had checked manually, I would've removed the notability tag first, just did it. OccultZone (Talk) 08:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
@Bgwhite:Article still had unbalanced reference style, per auto-program. I have never seen this refstyle before. Switched to common reference style. OccultZone (Talk) 08:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
You should not have changed this without discussion per WP:CITEVAR. This style (of using the "refs= parameter) is more often seen on larger articles to make it easier to find the ref text and avoind cluttering the body of the article, but you still should not have changed it. SpinningSpark 07:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

sascon

Resolved

re: SAScon

I added internal links from the Mike Little, Search Engine Strategies and Manchester Metropolitan University Business School to Sascon. Not completely happy with the link from the latter as might feel unnecessary - although the addition that the location is used for conferences is both factual and relevant. Hope this helps. Jamesfx3 (talk) 12:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

@Jamesfx3: Good. Removed tag, reviewed article, created talk page. OccultZone (Talk) 12:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Rape in India

Please stop deleting my fully and properly sourced amendments to the main article.

Your stated reason for deleting my amendments is that in your view there is no need to "expand on the lead." This reason seems flimsy, meaningless and more to the point makes no sense at all given the substance of my amendments. I was not expanding on anything in the main article but was citing the fact that rape goes largely unreported in India and that the statistics cited in the main article had to be viewed with a healthy amount of skepticism, which is what a lot of journalists are calling for as well.

If you have a substantive issue with my amendments then share them here - I always keep an open mind; but do not delete them and provide flimsy reasons for doing so, as you will leave me with no other choice but to report you.

Many Thanks

Andrew Andrewstephens1234 19:55, 30 May 2014 {UTC}

Let me read, 1st source don't even have a word like "culture" and you claim that "culture stigma" is the cause. 2nd, source from "Washingtonmonthly" is just a opinion of a writer who is expressing self opinion that how low rape cases occur in India, and "how many unreported rapes does all this extrapolate to? It’s difficult to even think about", how it accomplishes anything?
Finally the last source of "express.co.uk" claims that "Activists say that figure is misleading due to a culture of tolerance for sexual violence in India which leads many cases to go unreported." It is obviously WP:WEASEL, I mean which activists? How it establishes anything? When it is certainly the job of Activist to 'say' something. We know that rapes go underreported, but doesn't means that it can be written here, without knowing the authority behind the allegation.
Read WP:UNDUE, WP:OR, WP:SOAPBOXING and WP:SYNTH. OccultZone (Talk) 00:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

The fixer

Thank you for fixing all those small details. Geschichte (talk) 20:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Royal descendants of John William Friso

I'm assuming good faith for your recent edits, but the references were listed in the order with the list to which they referred just FYI. Thanks. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

@Presidentman: Your referencing style, formatting style are not accurate. They require a lot of change. I will edit them later. OccultZone (Talk) 00:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Could you please elaborate on what I'm doing wrong for future reference? - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 10:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

required intervention

A user tagged himself as a reviewer and some false arguing with me at this page User_talk:Visakha_veera#Use_talk_page.--Vin09 (talk) 06:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

@Vin09: You have to open discussion on WP:ANI, but I can make it simple for you, go here, link to the discussion you have made with the user, and use a URL to address that you are sure about the status of the user, this link will help. Good luck. OccultZone (Talk) 06:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
disruptive editing after he was reported to admin, have your word here User_talk:Visakha_veera#May_2014--Vin09 (talk) 07:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
please have your comment, i was also warned because of the others mistake. User_talk:Visakha_veera#May_2014--Vin09 (talk) 07:10, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
@Vin09: Forget that last post. If the user rever again, you can post again on the ANI. I will have a watch. OccultZone (Talk) 08:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Linguistic gymnastics

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Patriarchal Code is a good place to start, followed by the full article history. If you choose to participate in the discussion let on;y the draft article influence your thoughts. Fiddle Faddle 09:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Service Awards

Are the service awards self awarded?--Vin09 (talk) 04:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes if you fit the requirements. OccultZone (Talk) 04:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your compliment. Cyanidethistles (talk) 06:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Resolved

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to OccultZone/monobook.js may have broken the syntax by modifying 8 "{}"s and 14 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:55, 1 June 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to OccultZone/monobook may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Liberia=|Liberia-importance=|Gambia=|Gambia-importance=}}","{"+"{WikiProject Universities|class=}}"];
  • AfricaProject|class=|importance=|Togo=|Togo-importance=}}","{"+"{WikiProject Universities|class=}}"];

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:40, 1 June 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Srđan Šolkotović may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Solkotovic ,Travis Bureau, Rade Djambic,Darko Habus and Ivan Miskovic joining SCM U Craiova] ]. In December 2, 2012 playing with SCM U Craiova Under 23 team against BCM Pitesti he torn his ACL

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:27, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

need help about Doc PenPen B. Takipsilim's Article

Resolved

Dear OccultZone,

First, thank you very much for the encouragement to improve my article. I am still conceptualizing the most appropriate formats, designs and embedding of photos, like sample of my original poems (in PENTASI B Collector's Edition ) exhibited in Irving K. Barber Learning Center and The National Museum of the Philippines.

I must admit I am still studying how to maximize the use of wikipedia editing tools for best result. Rest assured all the contents and my article can be fully authenticated and verified.

Your help and suggestions will be greatly appreciated.


Yours truly,

Doc PenPen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc PenPen B. Takipsilim (talk • contribs) 12:06, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

@Doc PenPen B. Takipsilim: I am willing to help, but first answer this question. Are you writing an article about yourself? OccultZone (Talk)

Serndhu Polama

Hi,

Thanks for letting me know about this. Since the article was deleted through the proposed deletion process, which depends on unanimous consent, I choose to interpret the article's recreation as an objection to the PROD, rendering the PROD null and void. The proper course now would be for anyone objecting to the article to take it to AfD. I am not surprised to have the question arise, though. I have seen other administrators treat expired PRODs as binding, and delete identical recreations. I disagree with this approach, but my general attitude is to avoid outright conflict over such things. Anyway, I'll allow the article to remain, and clearly tag it as a contested PROD, so the matter will be obvious for everyone. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 20:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for investigating. Small article, non-controversial, and so on.. Hopefully the article won't cause any problem to encyclopedia. OccultZone (Talk) 00:51, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of THE ALPHA COMPLEX PAGE?

We have references but when I posted them it said it is not accepted. There is no reason to delete the page as my other bands have pages. I am an a stablished artist and there are plenty of references to collaborate this however I am not knowledgable on how to submit the references. Please help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.137.185.4 (talk) 06:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Are you inserting banned links? Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. OccultZone (Talk) 06:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


No. I finally figured out the reference thing. I have more references coming and media sources to report on the band. If you delete this page it will greatly hinder the band as this is a resource for Pandora and other sites that want information on the band. 4:26PM PST 6/2/2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2E5A:E0F0:21F3:AD6D:3F76:4A0B (talk) 23:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

But you are using your own website or unreliable sources for references. OccultZone (Talk) 23:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Also this is not an autobiography it is an informational page. Please look at my previous bands motograter and Riven. They are both done in the same manner. I need your help to get this done right. DO NOT DELETE! Please just tell me what you need to see as I am trying the best I can not knowing your system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2E5A:E0F0:21F3:AD6D:3F76:4A0B (talk) 23:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your other bands had reliable sources. It is just different story. OccultZone (Talk) 23:38, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

I will have reliable sources soon but that doesn't happen within a week. What is a reliable source? What would put this to rest. I am starting to get fairly bothered as the deletion of this page will disrupt a number of things this band is about to do. PANDORA.com being one of them. Please help rather than correct. 12:52 PM PST 6/3/2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Screaminmike (talk • contribs) 19:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

If you are going to do press release, let me know. Press release are not reliable sources. OccultZone (Talk) 19:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Review

Pls review this page Guntakal Railway Division--Vin09 (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done OccultZone (Talk) 08:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Biographies

Thank you so much! Do you know the ISSN/ISBN of "Asian culture - Volume 16 - Page 219, 1992"? Is it on Google Books? WhisperToMe (talk) 11:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

@WhisperToMe: No ISBN, but the link of source, check. OccultZone (Talk) 11:48, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! That link is perfect for verification purposes! WhisperToMe (talk) 11:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
One more thing: Is it okay if you link to specific Google Books page numbers? It will make verification much easier! WhisperToMe (talk) 12:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
You can. Although some people lack access to even the most common books. So it may benefit a few. OccultZone (Talk) 12:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! I found a bunch of new article ideas from one of those sources WhisperToMe (talk) 14:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Keep up the good work. OccultZone (Talk) 14:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

RfC/U

Dear user, I want to inform you that I posted a RfC/U to obtain formal mediation in the respect of the issue I have communicating with user:Director. You tried in the past to mediate and I need confirmation of your effort in the RfC [[11]] to validate the actual RfC/U. --Silvio1973 (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

@Silvio1973: Lets see how it goes. I have no problem with both of you honestly. I will comment anytime. OccultZone (Talk) 12:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
What I want is that we both participated to the project with civility, but unfortunately I did not manage to get there. I do not even know if I correctly posted the RfC/U properly. It is quite a complex bureaucracy. I am afraid that I did somethng wrong and that the form is not visible or worse that no-one previuosly involved validated the actual form and it expired. --Silvio1973 (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Woops? Okay no worries. You have posted on the page of Dennis Brown, he shall help you with your first Rfc. OccultZone (Talk) 12:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Dennis Brown is currenyly unavailable and I need two or more users certifying the basis for the dispute (they can be "Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute" or "Additional users endorsing this cause for concern". It is very bureaucratic process but it's like that. Please let me know if you can help certifying this RfC/U.Silvio1973 (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Grandfather photo

I need help uploading a image to put on my grandfathers page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Reed_%28baseball%29 Wreedps (talk) 02:46, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

@Wreedps: You should write on people' talk page, not userpage. If you want to upload image, you should first upload it to http://www.commons.wikimedia.org . You can tell me here, once you have completed. OccultZone (Talk) 02:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference profile was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OccultZone/Archive_3&oldid=1077613708"