User talk:OccamzRazor

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Techdirt, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Techdirt" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Patent trolling

Nice work to the patent troll article here. I can't follow all the changes you made but overall it looks like a significant improvement. Thanks, - Wikidemon (talk) 01:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but there is still a lot of clean-up and improvement needed on that article. There has been a lot of press and other action in the last three months that should be included and a lot of extraneous stuff that isn't needed. OccamzRazor (talk) 03:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal still desired?

Thanks for your note. It seems I forgot to remove that one. Done, now. Thanks again. --Edcolins (talk) 20:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Arthur (radio announcer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Skin Deep and True Confessions. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Edge of Seventeen (song)

You were involved in the article Edge of Seventeen (song); I invite you to discuss an ongoing page move discussion. --George Ho (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTBROKEN

Hello, OccamzRazor. What valid reason do you have for rejecting the WP:NOTBROKEN guideline at the Angelina Jolie article, as seen here after I pointed you to it? Your edit that I reverted twice adds nothing except redundancy. Also see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking#Editor not seeing the benefit of WP:NOTBROKEN. Flyer22 (talk) 01:33, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you reply to me about this, I prefer that you do so here at your talk page to keep the discussion centralized. Flyer22 (talk) 01:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, OccamzRazor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, OccamzRazor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of E.Digital Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E.Digital Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E.Digital Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 20:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patriot Scientific Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patriot Scientific Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patriot Scientific Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]