User talk:Obinnation

Welcome!

Hello, Obinnation, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I accidentally reverted your edits.Sorry for any inconvenience caused. I have undone my revision.--94rain (talk) 05:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tosin Adejuwon

Hello Obinnation,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tosin Adejuwon for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Obinnation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been accused of been a suck pupetery of u:Pptt226 which am not. I opened my wiki account in March 2018 before u:Pptt226 opened his/her account so there is no way i can be a suck to the account. The only way i think i may have erred here is helping a friend to contribute on an article which i understand go against the COI and i duly regret it, but i am not a suck whatsoever and only in this platform to contribute well. I will be most grateful if can be forgiven and promise that it wont happen again for COI Obinnation (talk) 11:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

On the one hand, you say you are not a sockpuppet (sock, not suck). On the other hand, you acknowledge that you are a sockpuppet ("helping a friend"). That, plus your confirmed sockpuppetry leaves me no choice but to endorse your block. Yamla (talk) 12:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Obinnation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As stated above, i am not suck a pupetery to u:Pptt226; i only admitted to the bad i did which is helping a friend outside wiki interactions to work on an article which i didn't know was wrong up until now. I regret that but i am not a sock and didn't operate multiple account; i can provide prove off wiki that i am not a sock and a real person. Thanks Obinnation (talk) 23:04, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So sorry. I cannot unblock you at this time. It's like Yamla already said above. This is a WP:check user block. Please reread the WP:GAB to see what options you might have. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Obinnation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, i have reread WP:GAB as suggested by u:Dlohcierekim and clearly understand that this is a WP:check user block but still stand on the fact that am not u:Pptt226 or neither a sock. I just want unblock please; my edits history showed how i have developed intrinsic interest in editing Wikipedia and how i love to contribute it to it daily and now really miss editing. I owned up to the only error i might have committed but feel was blocked in error as a sock of u:Pptt226 better still i think a input from @Berean Hunter: will go along way here. Thanks and well done for the good works Obinnation (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are saying that you are not a sockpuppet but you should read WP:MEAT to understand that meatpuppets are sockpuppets. Saying that you haven't socked means that you still don't understand.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bello Bala Shagari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bello Bala Shagari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bello Bala Shagari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:18, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]