User talk:Oakster/Archive 4

Θakster

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

WM 25 battle royal

Do you listen to the Pro Wrestling Report on ESPN Radio (it's available on iTunes too)? Sunny was the guest on this weeks show (which airs live on Mondays right after Raw ends) and she confirmed that she will be one of the 25 divas. I am not sure if we should include that though or how to cite it if we should. TJ Spyke 22:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GSC and HC title

I have tried to explain to Chris2K5, but if he persists could you try to explain. Darrenhusted (talk) 19:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've explained it to me by making straw man arguments. I'm going by what WWE considers to be the definition, which does not include the Hardcore Championship as part of the Grand Slam. Yes, it may have at one point, but the point is they no longer do and therefore the Hardcore Championship cannot be considered part of the Grand Slam.

Question

Hey, I plan to work on WrestleMania 25 and take it to GA then FA, would you like to work with me on doing so?--WillC 05:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll get to work on it here in a few days. Lets get pass the phase where everyone keeps working on it. Around May should be a good time to work on it.--WillC 09:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No hurry anyway. I just need help on the marketing and production sections. Plus I'll probably try to get Genesis, Against All Odds, Destination X, and Lockdown 09 all on GAN before WrestleMania. I rather have a 2009 TNA article be a GA before a ROH or WWE one. I did it last year, would like to try again this year. So I'll be taking my time with Mania. It is a special article, plus I hear it was bad to good, so not looking forward to watching the event to see some bad segments and matches.--WillC 09:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I might get involved a bit.--WillC 06:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, great! Thank you very much! I had forgotten about that discussion. Nice to see the change. This may improve the articles in one way or another. I'm actually trying to work on the PPV format, so good to see someone is working on the template. Oh, can I get your opinion on something? What do you think of what I have down so far format wise here: User:Wrestlinglover/Genesis (2009)?--WillC 15:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For being a great contributor and working on the PPV template to make it so much better. Thank you very very much.--WillC 09:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I felt you needed something for your hard work. Just saying good job or thanks I didn't think was enough. A little box with a star I think was more suitable. :) Now that AJ has won the TNA Title, I'm in a good mood and I pay more attention to other's good contributions, so I've become more considerate of others.--WillC 11:06, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why? What about you, you in a happy mood. If your favorite wrestler was A.J. Styles, you would know that he winning the TNA Title means he is a 4 time Triple Crown Champion and the only man to ever do that plus the only man to hold every TNA controled championship: NWA World Heavyweight, NWA World Tag, TNA World Heavyweight, TNA World Tag, TNA X Division, and TNA Legends.--WillC 11:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhat. What do you think of the TNA Titles? I find it funny I'm the only one expanding the main title articles. I'm surprised I got the TNA Knockout Tag Team Championship expanded to such a extent when it is only a few days old.--WillC 08:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and you to on the templates. I nominated it twice. Was going to do it again, but that hippo guy has it watchlisted and every edit I do he checks so I can't work on it. I got a topic in the works. After I get the other articles in the topic done, I'll probably work on it somemore than renominate it.--WillC 09:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWE template

Why did you move JTG to SmackDown in the template? He hasn't been drafted to SmackDown (according to WWE) [1]. TJ Spyke 19:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. TJ Spyke 19:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2010

Hi man, can you upload the cover of WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2010 to Commons.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alejandro Andrade Ponce (talk • contribs) 02:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ECW on Syfy

You and I know you're right, but wouldn't this still be crystal balling a little bit? What if WWE for whatever reason leaves the spelling as SciFi after July 7? Bmg916^Speak 12:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

d'oh!, just saw the topic and your link at WT:PW...I'll go crawl back into my hole now. Bmg916^Speak 13:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edge and Chris Jericho

I see your prod and raise you one of my own. People make me laugh sometimes... Bmg916^Speak 19:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your prod was removed. Time for AfD? Bmg916^Speak 01:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guess we just have to wait and see what happens. Hopefully it goes the full seven though. Definitely not a tag team worthy of an article, especially since Edge will be out for a long time with his torn Achilles tendon. Bmg916^Speak 21:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ECW on Sci Fi to ECW on Syfy

I request that you move the page from ECW on Sci Fi to ECW on Syfy because the Sci Fi Channel has now become Syfy. Could you please move that page right now? I would really appreciate this a whole lot. This is very important. AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SummerSlam

Main Event appears to be just an Australian PPV provider, meaning that is just the Australian PPV poster. Both images are valid, but the North American one is already up, plus the only PPV's we use the European/Australian posters for are the UK only PPV's. With similar situations over video game covers (where there is more than 1 cover that could go in) we usually go with the first one. So my opinion is that we should just stick with the current poster. I think is definitely possible WWE could change it, but the Main Event poster isn't any more wrong or right than the In Demand one. TJ Spyke 18:27, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you uploaded a new poster (from WWE Shop Zone). In Demand also updated their poster. It's basically the same, but has minor differences (Kofi Kingston is on it instead of MVP, and Shawn Michaels is smiling) http://www.indemand.com/product/view/141661 . I don't mind either one, but which do you think we should use? Both are technically official. TJ Spyke 19:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SvR 2010

Absolutely my friend, I started the gameplay section with the tutorial (you can probably fix that up too). I'll work on the story mode.--Truco ₅₀₃ 19:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good work man, we deserve barnstars! =P

		The VG Barnstar
		For expanding WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2010 upon the announcement of its features and protecting it from IP/newbie vandalism! Oakster you deserve this! Truco ₅₀₃ 23:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Truco ₅₀₃ 23:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Now its time to battle all the IPs/newbies.--Truco ₅₀₃ 15:13, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Linda Mcmahon article

Hey Oakster:

My apologies on the template confusion. I am unsure on how to get an acceptable profile pic, what with the fair licensing and all, and I would like to know if you could help me.

Thanks!

--Screwball23 talk 21:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Promotional Posters/Wallpapers

Since you seem to be a respected member of WP:PW and the guru of pay per view posters I think you can answer my question. What is the difference between using the Indemand posters and using the wwe.com wallpapers. Both serve the same purpose. The difference being, Indemand usually has out of date material by the time the show actually comes out while wwe.com has up-to-date promotional material. I've asked this publicly for everyone to answer and the answer I got was basically, there's no reason why we can't use the wallpapers, we just don't. What do you think about this? Do you think if I brought it up that a consensus could be reached to allow for the more up-to-date material to be used in place of the indemand posters? It's not like it would cause inconsistency between articles as every pay per view has a poster on wwe.com. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 02:08, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. Another thing I forgot to mention is that allowing the use of the wallpapers in place of the Indemand posters would save a lot of needless edit warring. People are going to try and put the wallpapers on there no matter what and it ends up being a constant cycle of reverts. This could be stopped and people could spend the time they would normally spend reverting the addition of the wallpapers doing something else more constructive. I will bring this to the group for discussion. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 21:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE FAQ

Go ahead I don't care. If it ends the discussion I'm down with it.--WillC 14:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed your edit to WWE TLC. I saw you added the on air table. Thought you show you a new format I've started using with PPVs. Check out Turning Point (2008). Gets rid of the table, etc.--WillC 14:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, good.--WillC 22:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, wasn't aware of that guideline. I won't add it back to Reso. Thanks--WillC 01:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WWE TLC

Thank you for the help with the image on WWE:TLC the IP that keeps putting to image up must not know how fake that posters is.--Dcheagle (talk) 14:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC) Yea I went a head and had the page protected to keep the IP from replaceing the pictures--Dcheagle (talk) 20:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying of speedy deletions

Hi!

It probably just slipped your mind to do so this time, but you didn't notify the author of Jesus Freaks Championship that it was being nominated for speedy deletion. I've done that now for you. Cheers! Stephen! ^Coming... 17:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]