User talk:OOC OCD

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, OOC OCD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! I'm an Editor of the wiki^{[citation needed]} 15:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 213.42.23.71 lifted.

Request handled by: MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 11:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Living Lohan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 19:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lindsay Lohan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 23:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Lindsay Lohan.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -MBK₀₀₄ 23:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE stop vandalizing the article for Living Lohan. You don't know what you're doing. 67.78.143.227 (talk) 13:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Living-lohan l.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Living-lohan l.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Living-lohan l.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Living-lohan l.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Ee92307d83 ltploh05232008.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ee92307d83 ltploh05232008.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ee92307d83 ltploh05232008.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ee92307d83 ltploh05232008.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Bossy (Lindsay Lohan song). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] - Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bossy (Lindsay Lohan song)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bossy (Lindsay Lohan song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bossy (Lindsay Lohan song). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Lindsay Lohan. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 16:05, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Living-lohan l.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Living-lohan l.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ee92307d83 ltploh05232008.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ee92307d83 ltploh05232008.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mostly Ghostly (film)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mostly Ghostly (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out?

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out?, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Straight-to-video film. No suggestion of greater impact or notice.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CalendarWatcher (talk) 12:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out?

I have nominated Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out?, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out?. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. CalendarWatcher (talk) 05:51, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]