User talk:Nyuad2020

Welcome!

Hello, Nyuad2020, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Whpq (talk) 00:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Kyung-wha Chung Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kyung-wha Chung Portrait.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:37, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Regarding Fair Use Image Kyung-wha Chung and Ji Young Lim

Hello Whpq! Thank you so much for your messages with the above two pictures. I am an artist representative from Music and Art Company, an agency for both Kyungwha Chung and Ji Young Lim. I was requested by the artist themselves that the pictures that are being currently used in Wikipedia are not a correct representation of them visually, and any copyright-free material also does not meet that requirement. Since these are the photos of the living individual, I understand that their own intent is highly valued. Specifically, the photo being currently used for Kyungwha Chung in all language Wikipedia pages are actually taken in "situations where the subject did not expect to be photographed" which is against Wikipedia regulation. Unfortunately, I'm not well versed in technology (and my artists as well) and don't know how to delete those photos themselves so I request your help. I would also be okay if you need to share this in some editing conversation/debate page. Thank you so much for your help and consideration. Nyuad2020 (talk) 01:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Regarding the copyright issue in the Juilliard website, the agency owns the photo and provided the photo to the Juilliard School. In the website, you can check the resolution of the image file is much higher. == File:Kyung What Chung Portrait.jpg == Template:Autotranslate Nyuad2020 (talk) 00:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC) Nyuad2020 (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

I request this image to be deleted in the Wikimedia Commons as it is not freely copyrighted and to be uploaded under "fair usage" in Wikipedia in English and Korean Wikipedia page for Kyung Wha Chung (정경화). [1]Thank you so much. Nyuad2020 (talk) 01:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Nyuad2020 (talk) 01:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is clearly sitting for autograph signings in File:Kyung-wha Chung at SSO (20151005224117).jpg. It is perfectly reasonable to expect somebody to take a photo of the person signing autographs. If the subject prefers a different picture, then she or her representative can provide a freely licensed image although there is no guarantee that the image would be used. -- Whpq (talk) 01:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct that it is taken during the signing, but it is also clearly not when she posed for it. Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, and it is clearly not consented material to be published in such a highly renowned and used platform like Wikipedia. The photo also appears the very first in any Google search with her name, appearing way before any promotional materials, damaging the brand identity of her musicianship not to mention that she herself is not happy with it (if you see the photo, you will hopefully understand why). I am replacing it with a much better quality photo that contributes to the Wikipedia community. The only rule I am required to follow is as below: WP:BLPSELF WP:BLPCOMPLAIN WP:BLPSPS

There are living persons who publish material about themselves, such as through press releases or personal websites. Such material may be used as a source only if:

it is not unduly self-serving;

it does not involve claims about third parties;

it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the subject;

there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; and

the article is not based primarily on such sources.

Nyuad2020 (talk) 03:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the use of the photograph, there is no requirement that the subject agrees to pose for or allow the use of the photo. It is a freely licensed photo and is not demeaning or derogatory in any way so there is no issue with its use here on Wikipedia based on policy. That the subject doesn't like the photo is not a good reason to remove a freely licensed image in use in the article. If you or the subject is unhappy with the Google search results, then you need to take that up with Google. Wikipedia does not control Google's search results. As for replacing the image with the one you uploaded, as already explained, a non-free image for a living person is not acceptable per WP:NFCC#1. If the subject does not like this image, then the solution is to upload a freely licensed one that she does like. I doubt there would be much objection to such an image. As somebody who reviews quite a lot of uploaded images here, I've seen many publicity photos provided under a free license by following Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. -- Whpq (talk) 13:22, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ji Young Lim.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ji Young Lim.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello Nyuad2020. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Kyung Wha Chung, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nyuad2020. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nyuad2020|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Whpq (talk) 00:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Paid Work for Client

I am currently an unpaid/uncompensated (except for experience) internship for the agency, and mainly doing all the translation and interpretation related work as a volunteer. If I get paid later on by any chance, I will make sure to disclose that information on my profile. I have been a personal fan for her for more than a decade and contacted the company to get the approval for editing and uploading this Wikipedia page. As of now, the truth is I am doing this entirely for a goodwill and my personal passion for Kyung Wha Chung's artistic expertise and legacy. Is this enough as an explanation for this discussion or do I need more information on this? I wish I can disclose the financial statement for you. Nyuad2020 (talk) 01:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%A0%95%EA%B2%BD%ED%99%94

Per Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, "Interns, on-loan staff, and unpaid workers, including volunteers, are deemed to be employees. If they are directed or expected to edit Wikipedia as part of their tasks, they must make a paid-contribution disclosure." As such, you are required to make a paid disclosure. -- Whpq (talk) 01:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So what, if I receive a compensation and disclose it on my wall you will not revert my edits citing as "vandalism" when I'm clearly citing a correct and valid citation, including artists that are not part of the agency I'm working for? I'm honestly confused with the guideline.Nyuad2020 (talk) 03:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, let me clarify that none of the reverts were for vandalism as you claim. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a directory service. Listing the managing agency doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article. That was why it was reverted, including reverting for an agency you don't work for. It is not because of your status as a paid contributor. -- Whpq (talk) 13:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ji Young Lim.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ji Young Lim.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kyung-wha Chung Portrait.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kyung-wha Chung Portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Kyung Wha Chung, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Nyuad2020, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nyuad2020|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 13:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've already told you above that an internship is considered to be in the scope of paid contributions even if you are not being paid. You must provide a disclosure statement. -- Whpq (talk) 13:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]