User talk:Nues20

Welcome

Hello, Nues20! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Spike Toronto 05:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Edit Summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. — Spike Toronto 05:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Daniel Radcliffe worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 21:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Javier Bardem

Your good-faith edit at Javier Bardem resulted in the reinsertion of material that violates copyright and has been reverted. Please refer to the article's talk page for details. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

You appear to be involved in an edit war, according to the reverts you have made on Natalie Portman. If you edit disruptively including breaking the three-revert rule you may be blocked without further warning.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors.
Alternatively you can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. --TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Helen Mirren. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 21:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in the edit summary a consensus has been reached about not having the awards in the filmography. You are free to try and change that but you should not revert until you have done so. It is also incorrect to lit here TV work as "TV Movies" MarnetteD | Talk 21:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Meryl Streep filmography. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MarnetteD | Talk 21:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Allison Janney. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 23:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are currently edit warring AGAIN against consensus. If you want the article for Meryl Streeps awards article removed you need to list it at WP:AFD and make your case there. Only after it is deleted, which is highly unlikely, can you then add the awards to the filmography. MarnetteD | Talk 20:48, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have just returned the page to a version that contains a WP:EGG violation. That can be considered WP:TENDENTIOUS editing as well as being WP:POINTy. Wikipedia operates by WP:CONSENSUS. As I have already advised you several times you will need to change that consensus for that page to reinstitute you edits. For the most part you do good work on articles. But your tendency to edit war to get your way can be a problem. Please focus on the good work that you do but if other editors disagree with it discuss it on the talk page first. If you don't get a consensus for your changes then please drop it. I have had hours of my work here changed or deleted entirely. I didn't like that at first but I realized that is the way things work here. You will be happier in your editing if you can do the same. MarnetteD | Talk 21:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Meryl Streep filmography. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MarnetteD | Talk 22:07, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Until you start a discussion on the articles talk page and get a consensus to add the info you are edit warring when you put it back in. Please do not make posts to my user page as that is not the correct page to do that. MarnetteD | Talk 22:59, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Beans Balawi with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. gz³³ (talk) 12:59, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Beans Balawi with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. gz³³ (talk) 13:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of awards and nominations received by Glee. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Frickative 16:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. bodnotbod (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --T1980 (talk) 00:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Christopher Plummer. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 16:55, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Gordon-Levitt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In 18th Screen Actors Guild Awards, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Mike Ross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Doniago, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 20:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing of various kinds, including personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Philip Seymour Hoffman. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Please stop adding "Template:" to navboxes. It is optional and just makes the pages larger.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jessica Chastain. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You really cannot remove over 11k of content without even providing an edit summary. What in any case can be the justification for removing all information about awards she has received? Mirokado (talk) 21:35, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Washington D.C. Area Film Critics Association Awards 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Hooper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Philip Seymour Hoffman. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 17:28, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Philip Seymour Hoffman. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 18:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Philip Seymour Hoffman shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 22:02, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regards: Easter Egg links

Please see WP:EGG. This guideline advocates that you do not abuse the piping process so that the links take readers to unexpected places. Eg, <code>[[Detroit Film Critics Society|Detroit Film Critics Society Award for Best Actress]]</code> is not logical piping; readers would expect to follow the link to read about the award, when instead, they would be pointed to the society. Please be conscious of this. BOVINEBOY2008 17:49, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again: [1]. BOVINEBOY2008 16:16, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on List of Game of Thrones Awards

Thank you for your edit, could you please link me to your source so that I can update the article? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits

I have reverted your addition to Morgan Saylor as it was both completely unsourced and, even more worrisome, a cut and paste of her IMDb bio which constitutes a blatant copyright violation. I am concerned that the vast amount of warnings and pointers to Wikipedia policy on this talk page are being disregarded. I urge you to review the biographies of living persons policy, the guideline as to what constitutes a reliable source, and our very strict rules on copyright.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nues20. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nues20. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]