User talk:NuclearLemon
NuclearLemon, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
|
Hi NuclearLemon!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Ways to improve Jabaco
[edit]Hi, I'm Ormr2014. NuclearLemon, thanks for creating Jabaco!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I'm not completely sure that Jacobo meets Wikipedia's notability criteria; many programming languages don't and Jacobo does not have much indicating this is more notable than those.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ormr2014 (talk) 19:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Otherwise Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Otherwise Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GLG GLG (talk) 21:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
The article Jabaco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Cannot find any sources. Appears to be non-notable shareware/freeware which never received a non-beta release and which has not been updated in over 10 years.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr248 (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabaco until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.