User talk:Nu Yawk NY

February 2015

Hello, I'm AgnosticPreachersKid. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Virginia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! APK whisper in my ear 05:11, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Maryland for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. APK whisper in my ear 05:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 22:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:JohnInDC, you may be blocked from editing. JohnInDC (talk) 22:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern seaboard states

Please stop making significant substantive changes without raising the issue on the article Talk pages. You have been reverted now by two separate editors - that should be a clue that you are doing something wrong. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Washington, D.C. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JohnInDC (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. APK whisper in my ear 23:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bencherlite ^Talk 23:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I Love your work. Because you speak the truth and you keep it real. Nu Yawk Sity (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]