User talk:Ntay

Welcome!

Hello, Ntay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod 04:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Break a Leg Banner.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Break a Leg Banner.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Break a Leg (sitcom)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Break a Leg (sitcom), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Break a Leg (sitcom). Thank you. Mkdw ^talk 08:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Celtx 995 XP.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Celtx 995 XP.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view for controversy section of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Hello, The controversy section you removed from Debbie Wasserman Schultz is sourced. I agree with you that it can be improved to better meet WP:NPOV. Some of the details I think are excessive and non-encyclopedic and there is a lack of attribution and counter arguments. You may edit the text to improve it in line with the recommendations of the policy, if your changes get reverted then you should try to reach consensus at the talk page of the article. In any case you should not try to delete the whole section without first reaching a consensus. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]