User talk:Nscs

Welcome!

Hello, Nscs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Gflores ^Talk 21:52, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add copyrighted text to Wikipedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, National Society of Collegiate Scholars, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:National Society of Collegiate Scholars. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at National Society of Collegiate Scholars, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. — Miles ←☎ 04:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to have the article restored as written, and you own the rights to the text previously at the NSCS article, you must either post a notice on the NSCS website releasing the relevant text [1][2] under the GNU Free Documentation License (or into the public domain), or else send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation. Keep in mind that this grants not only Wikipedia, but everyone the right to use your text under the terms of the license. Otherwise you will need to rewrite the page so that it does not use any copyrighted material (do so on this temporary subpage). See Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information.

Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which makes it clear who said what, and when. Thank you. — Miles ←☎ 21:59, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NSCS Logo

I am trying to add this to the page, but everytime it said I have violated copyright law. I am an employee of an NSCS and have the right to add that image to the page. I also have the serial number from our originally filing. Do you know how I can get this image on the page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nscs (talk • contribs) 16:45, October 2, 2006 (UTC).

Wikipedia is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It is not sufficient to give Wikipedia permission to use copyrighted materials. It is irrelevant that you are an NSCS employee. To upload copyrighted content to Wikipedia you must do one of the following:

License your content under a free license; this will allow anyone to use the content for any purpose so long as certain requirements are met. Only the copyright holder (NSCS) can do this. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.
Upload it with a Fair Use tag and provide a detailed fair use rational. See Wikipedia:Fair use.

Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy for more information to avoid your uploads being deleted. — Miles ←☎ 03:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Nscs (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a new logo and the image is not appearing as an image Nscs (talk) 16:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you need to use format it like this -> [[file:imagenamehere.jpg]] in order for it to work.Sophie (: 16:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) What do you mean? That you still see the old version of File:NSCS Logo.jpg? In that case, you should bypass your cache. Svick (talk) 16:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to File:NSCS Logo.jpg, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: File:NSCS Logo.jpg was changed by Nscs (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-05-12T16:27:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NationalSocietyofCollegiateScholarslogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NationalSocietyofCollegiateScholarslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NSCS copyrightlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NSCS copyrightlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:NSCS copyrightlogo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:NSCS copyrightlogo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim 1357 ^talk 05:09, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Society of Torch & Laurel (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Society of Torch & Laurel.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Society of Torch & Laurel (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Society of Torch & Laurel.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 10:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nscs, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Society of Torch & Laurel concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Society of Torch & Laurel, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Society of Torch & Laurel

Hello Nscs. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The Society of Torch & Laurel".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Society of Torch & Laurel}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ScholarCon (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ScholarCon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saposhiente (talk • contribs) 11:19, 18 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Nscs", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it implies that it represents an organisation rather than an individual, see WP:CORPNAME. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. - You say "I am an employee of an NSCS ...", so you need to read about conflict of interest and about paid editing. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. James086^Talk 23:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categories