Jump to content

User talk:Npthura/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Npthura, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Npthura! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Npthura! Thank you for your contributions. I am 300HierPandis and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! 300HierPandis (talk) 19:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited F. S. Faizal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vajram. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Qalandarabad, Pakistan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Qalandarabad, Pakistan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cereal dispenser

Hello, Npthura. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cereal dispenser".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Video games

Hey Npthura—thanks for your recent contributions. I noticed your interest in Wikipedia's video game content and thought you might be interested in the video games WikiProject. We've done some great work (over 300 pieces of Featured content and over 1200 Good articles), but there is plenty more to do. You can watch our announcements page for article review, feedback, and cleanup suggestions. Our talk page is a also good place to request third opinions, ask questions, and get feedback. If I can help with anything, swing by my talk page any time. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope I'll see you around. Le Panini [🥪] 01:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Npthura! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to upload non-free image, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lerner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Lerner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Craftopia (video game) (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Seems to be WP:TOOSOON. While it will probably be notable in the future when it leaves Early Access, the Rock Paper Shotgun feature is the only substantial piece of coverage from a reliable source it got as of yet.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim French has been accepted

Tim French, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 22:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Troy McKeown has been accepted

Troy McKeown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Yo

Can you then teach me how to make the article not rely on primary sources. Heffner000 (talk) 03:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

If you search up any person's name on Google and then go to the news section at the top section of the screen below the search bar, you'll hopefully find reliable secondary sources there. Npthura (talk) 13:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm WiiBoi. I noticed that you recently removed content from Forza Horizon 3 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WiiBoi (talk) 03:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

University of Washington station

So do you have an actual reason for this reversion? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Washington_station&diff=1012996045&oldid=1012993464 168.8.192.22 (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

See, I'm having trouble with four points here:

  • An article's lead can't be improved or clarified once it has passed FA... 2 years ago?
  • An article that starts with "University of Washington is a light rail station" isn't in need of clarification?
  • An article about a location identified on its owner/operator's website (and a good many other RS's) as "University of Washington Station" doesn't need to be identified by that name in the lead?
  • An article titled "University of Washington station" shouldn't have the word "station" in its first sentence, in defiance of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(US_stations)#Lead ?

I'm very confused. Thanks in advance for clarifying. 168.8.192.22 (talk) 13:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

You'll have to consult my pal Bill from marketing for this one. He has more expertise in that field. Npthura (talk) 01:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Npthura/Archive_1&oldid=1104446461"