User talk:Noxiousnews

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 23:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Bhangra music

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Bhangra music. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Bhangra. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Bhangra - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. First Light (talk) 22:32, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Surjit Bindrakhia. Thank you. 7 11:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noxiousnews. You have new messages at Barek's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:55, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: list of bhangra bands

Re: your message: As noted by Barek, please review Wikipedia:Vandalism before accusing any editor of vandalism. I also recommend that you review Wikipedia:Civility as name calling as you did on my talk page is unnecessary. All of my edits were in line to clean up the listing of the article to remove non-notable bands without articles or links to articles that were not about musical acts. If you have issues with certain bands' inclusion on the list, like JoSH, as imported from Category:Bhangra musical groups, then I suggest that you take up the category dispute on the respective band's article talk page. If you feel that a band is notable enough for inclusion on the list, I suggest that you create a new article about them. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to List of bhangra bands, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to List of bhangra bands, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:43, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic List of bhangra bands. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at List of bhangra bands. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. Shimeru 17:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please note, immediately returning and resuming the activity that resulted in the initial block is not acceptable. Take your issues to the article talk page, and allow community consensus to develop. Continued disruptive editing can result in blocks of longer durations, and if needed semi-protection of the article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:09, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at List of bhangra bands, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been repeatedly warned over these types of edits in the past, and even blocked twice from editing as a result of your disruptive editing to this article. Entries should be demonstrated to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines at WP:N and WP:BAND - using original research to create the list fails Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Azaad band

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Azaad band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 22:42, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is List of bhangra bands (again). Thank you. —- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Ryulong (竜龙) 01:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Multitone records

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Multitone records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Ryulong (竜龙) 01:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Multitone records

The article Multitone records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article that likely doesn't meet WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. N^oformation ^Talk 02:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sources are provided at the bottom of the article

3RR warning on List of bhangra bands

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on List of bhangra bands. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of bhangra bands

This is not a list of all bhangra bands. This is not a list of bhangra bands and their record labels. This is not a list of bhangra bands who may or may not be active. It is not a list of bhangra bands and their members. It is a list of notable bhangra bands. This means that all of the content you have been adding is not relevant or sourced. Undo your last edit to the article or you will very likely be blocked for edit warring.—Ryulong (竜龙) 02:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for bringing it to my attention, I have edited out notable to include list of bhangra bands.

That was not the point. Wikipedia is not a place to list everything that belongs under a single topic. It should only be a list of notable bhangra bands, of which there are only 11 entries.—Ryulong (竜龙) 03:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule at List of bhangra bands. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of bhangra bands for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of bhangra bands is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bhangra bands until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Ryulong (竜龙) 03:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

THEIR YOU HAVE IT, THE DEFINITION OF ETHNOCENTRISM

deny the existence of a movement, and when people turn to wikipedia to look it up, wikipedia will FAIL them

For someone accusing others of ethnocentrism, you sure are being extremely ethnocentric yourself. Wikipedia has no bias. Only editors like yourself are biased. I have no opinion as to the bhangra music genre. All I know is that you have severe ownership issues, you do not know what Wikipedia is for, and you lack any good faith towards other users. If you do not change your attitude, you may find that this 24 hour block will soon be extended indefinitely.—Ryulong (竜龙) 06:36, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ms scandalous, abrar ul haque and lmfao JOSH back under 'list of bhangra bands' bwaahahahahahhahaa, go ahead throw lady gaga in too. care to explain how single individuals, abrar ul haque, ms scandalous, aman hayer etc. constitute bands?

Please calm down. You seem to confuse several issues. The AfD nomination is deciding whether Wikipedia should have a list on the topic. It does not mean the list entries cannon be adjusted thereafter by discussing them on the list's talk page. Please do not clutter the AfD discussion with tangential arguments about individual entries that have been added in good faith by some contributors who don't breathe bhangra every day. I'm sure they would be quite willing to have a reasoned discussion with you about the individual entries on talk:List of bhangra bands. Reserve Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bhangra bands for arguments whether a list should exist in Wikipedia at all. Regards, Have mörser, will travel (talk) 23:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Multitone Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Multitone Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multitone Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Ryulong (竜龙) 21:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Multitone Records. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Multitone Records with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 21:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. —Ryulong (竜龙) 22:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:Surjit Bindrakhia. Metricopolus (talk) 07:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not accuse me of overzealous and dismissive of anything. The articles as you wrote them were not suitable for Wikipedia. Others have come along to fix those errors. And the "unhelpful templates" discussion has nothing to do with you so I have no reason to answer it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 10:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jazzy B

I have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on Jazzy B, as the article was discussed and kept following a deletion discussion a few years ago and per policy is permanently ineligible for deletion under the proposed deletion process. I only did this to comply with policy; it is not my endorsement for keeping this article. If you still wish to pursue deletion, please go over WP:BEFORE first, then follow the three-step process at WP:AFDHOWTO to open a new deletion discussion. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Punjabi by nature

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Punjabi by nature requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Richard BB 00:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes on list of bands

Stop putting little notes on the list of bands. No other list has that information on it. You do not need to differentiate between another entity known as "Punjabi by Nature" on List of bhangra bands. It's a list of bands. Solo artists would not be on the page.—Ryulong (竜龙) 03:42, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"It's a list of bands. Solo artists would not be on the page." thats what I have been trying to tell you for the past few days. However, many solo artists are being inserted by you (such as ms scandalous), so I have to put the note to differentiate and avoid reader confusionNoxiousnews (talk) 03:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have not added anything to the list. But let me clarify myself. You do not have to put a note there to differentiate anything on that page. None of the other things are disambiguated. If anything, if there will be a page on the DJ, it would be at "DJ Punjabi by Nature". Stop putting a note of any type next to the Punjabi by Nature entry there.—Ryulong (竜龙) 04:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok ok calm downNoxiousnews (talk) 04:17, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Bollywood appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Shuipzv3 (talk) 07:17, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tigerstyle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Punjabi and Achanak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Folk music of Punjab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhangra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Music of the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhangra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jaz Dhami, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhangra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Noxiousnews. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Noxiousnews. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Punjabi by Nature

The article Punjabi by Nature has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Once nominated for an award, but did not receive it. Fails the criteria for WP:MUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karst (talk) 16:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bhangra (music), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keyboard and Punjabi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]