Talk:Multitone Records

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

sources are provided at the bottom of the article under the sources section be sure to check them out. The nominated for deletion entry has therefore been removed. The label was purchased by BMG (a major label) because it was NOTABLE,

BMG GOES BRITISH BHANGRA (ARTICLE BILLBOARD MAGAZINE NOV 28, 1992) (REFERENCE http://books.google.com/books?id=KRAEAAAAMBAJ&pg=RA1-PA42&lpg=RA1-PA42&dq=MULTITONE+BMG&source=bl&ots=39j-VfwS7a&sig=MpFbnfz6cm3CLMZkzh36OdC-eAc&hl=en&ei=bSefTq2qHPDYiALQ8e2EAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBzgK#v=onepage&q&f=false)

bhangra comes stateside via multitone
Billboard magazine, June 18, 1994 http://books.google.com/books?id=UQgEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA17&lpg=PA17&dq=billboard+multitone&source=bl&ots=95PbmdNlAB&sig=rHavhJwPFL2QQd-5O8aQuIu7aVs&hl=en&ei=4DWfTvaCKoWOigKf5OVZ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=billboard%20multitone&f=falseċ

sufficient references from reliable sources have been cited to avert any considerations for deletion. At this point, deletion would be purely subjective and borne of bias/ethnocentrism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noxiousnews (talk • contribs) 21:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

whoever rewrote the article

did a pretty good job, I think the notice for deletion should be removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noxiousnews (talk • contribs)

That's not how Wikipedia works.—Ryulong (竜龙) 00:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More than enough sources have been given (and very reliable ones at that). At this point the deletion notice is their as a joke. Ĝ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noxiousnews (talk • contribs) 00:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once nominated for AfD, the deletion discussion is allowed to run for seven days (with some exception on duration, documented at Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Deletion discussion). Once that is done, an established non-involved editor will close the AfD and the notice will be removed, plus any additional actions determined by the AfD discussion.

I agree that notability has now been established for the company; but the AfD processes exist so that the overall Wikipedia community has time to participate, allowing for different views to be presented and evaluated. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, a Subsidiary of Sony Music Holdings UK

After the Sale of BMG (which owned) Multitone, to Sony, Sony music seems to be the new owner, with Multitone as a subsidiary. Added Reference.Noxiousnews (talk) 06:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

added fair use corporate logo Noxiousnews (talk) 09:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Multitone Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120407022047/http://www.worksmart.org.uk/company/company.php?id=01471066&showSubs to http://www.worksmart.org.uk/company/company.php?id=01471066&showSubs

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]