User talk:Nottedeluce

Welcome!

Hello, Nottedeluce, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 13:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Il Divo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Il Divo was changed by Nottedeluce (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935626 on 2015-04-27T15:05:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 27 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Il Divo page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 31 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Il Divo page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Il Divo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Windsor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Hammersmith Apollo page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Mama (Il Divo)"

Mama (Il Divo), a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person\, group of people\, band\, club\, company\, organization\, or web content\, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ♔ MONARCH ^{Ask me} 03:30, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Il Divo Videography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sketch and Digital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Live in London (Il Divo), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Adagio, Somewhere and Without You. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Il Divo page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alberto Quintero

added links pointing to Diesel, Casey Donovan, David Campbell and Luke Steele

Il Divo

added a link pointing to Littleton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Thanks for your article-translation work. Please remember to minimise linking on the English WP ... we don't normally link years or dates, or common terms unless technical.

My best wishes. Tony (talk) 06:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Il Divo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tangos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 27 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Sébastien Izambard page, your edit caused a URL error (help) and an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Il Divo discography page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Il Divo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mambo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Por una Cabeza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scent of a Woman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Live in London (Il Divo)

added links pointing to Adagio, John Reid, Come What May, Tom Evans, Andy Hill and Kevin Gilbert

Siempre (Il Divo album)

added links pointing to John Miles and John Reid

The Promise (Il Divo album)

added a link pointing to John Reid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Il Divo Videography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page It Takes Two. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Il Divo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hunt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amor & Pasión Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warner Theatre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Daniel Craig, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Again, as mentioned before, these videos use stock footage from the films - it doesn't mean that he is credited specifically for a music video. This is the case for all four. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Superheroes Unite for BBC Children in Need, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nottedeluce. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Hunt (company)

The article William Hunt (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources about this corporation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —S Marshall T/C 23:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nottedeluce. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help request for mapping section titles

Hi. We (the Research Team at Wikimedia Foundation) are building an algorithm that will align Wikipedia article sections across languages. For improving this algorithm we need the help of multilingual Wikipedia editors to provide true statements to the algorithm. You are contacted because based on your Babel template and/or content translation tool usage you know at least two of the following languages: ar (Arabic), fr (French), ja (Japanese), en (English), es (Spanish), ru (Russian).

(Note: by clicking the links in the following paragraph, you will be taken to Google spreadsheet.) If you'd like to help us with translating a subset of the section titles on or before 2018-05-06, please read and follow the instructions. If you see instructions in another language, please scroll down to find your preferred language. If you have questions about this message, you can contact us via Diego. Thank you! :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeless (Il Divo album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geoffrey Parsons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nottedeluce. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amor & Pasión Tour

Hello, Nottedeluce. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amor & Pasión Tour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Encore (Il Divo)

Hello, Nottedeluce. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Encore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sarah Joy Kabanuck

Hello, Nottedeluce. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sarah Joy Kabanuck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:At the Coliseum

Hello, Nottedeluce. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "At the Coliseum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Superheroes Unite for BBC Children in Need for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superheroes Unite for BBC Children in Need is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superheroes Unite for BBC Children in Need until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 10:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tom_Hardy_2021.png

A tag has been placed on File:Tom_Hardy_2021.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 09:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit

Hi Nottedeluce! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Nicholas Hoult that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 05:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nux (Mad Max), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Miller. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nicholas Hoult. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —Joeyconnick (talk) 03:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nottedeluce reported by User:KyleJoan (Result: ). Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 11:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for blocking me, instead of helping write a good article. This is how you despise my work and my time. This way you only achieve that there are fewer and fewer people who want to enter Wikipedia, because of old and poorly written articles, which do not describe reality or current events. And furthermore, it is not neutral.

I was doing a good job!! Neutral and without fanaticism!!

I hope you stop blocking me and instead help improve and teach how to create a good article. Nottedeluce (talk) 00:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They did not block you, I did. I did not block you for the content itself, but for edit warring (which means repeatedly hitting undo or changing the article back to the version you think is better). If the article has a problem and is outdated or not neutral, explain why on the article's talk page instead of edit warring, because edit warring will result in being blocked. - Aoidh (talk) 01:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You started the war by deleting all my content. Without giving it a chance: I delete everything and it's solved. This doesn't work like that, so people don't want to use Wikipedia or are motivated to help. Nottedeluce (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Nicholas Hoult. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 12:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When there is a dispute regarding the content, you should use the article's talk page and discuss the changes rather than repeatedly reverting to your preferred version, per WP:BRD. Please also note that you should not mark edits as minor unless they are truly minor edits as described at Help:Minor edit; you have marked most (if not all) of your edits to Nicholas Hoult as minor edits, but most of them are not minor edits at all. - Aoidh (talk) 12:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This way you only get fewer and fewer people to enter Wikipedia, with outdated articles that do not reflect reality.

By reverting my changes, you have left a NOT neutral and outdated article.

I only ask to be able to make updated and neutral articles. Nottedeluce (talk) 00:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have reasons to be unblocked. I also have them so as not to be blocked. My intention is only to improve the article and make it a good article.

Why don't other users let me write and add information to the article? Everything is correctly referenced, it is true information, the writing is very neutral and is NOT fanatical.

Please unblock me and continue editing the article.

I promise not to make so many changes in a row.

Thank you. Nottedeluce (talk) 00:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not revert any changes, but blocked you for edit warring. The issue is that when your edits were contested (meaning someone disagreed with them and reverted you), you did not discuss the changes on the talk page and attempt to get a consensus for the changes, but instead engaged in edit warring. Whether your edits are correct or not, repeatedly reverting to your preferred version is edit warring, which often leads to being blocked to prevent the disruption to the article caused by edit warring. When you ask Why don't other users let me write and add information to the article? that's a good reason why you should stop and discuss the changes on the article talk page, and explain why the content you added belongs and get clarification so that you understand what the issues are and why you're being reverted. Just because information is referenced does not mean it belongs on the article. Once you are no longer blocked I highly advise you to use the article's talk page and discuss the content and try to obtain a consensus regarding the material instead of trying to force through your changes, because if you continue to edit war you will likely be blocked again for a longer period of time. If it becomes apparent that you do not intend to cease edit warring you may be blocked indefinitely (meaning you are not automatically unblocked after a set amount of time has passed) and in that case you would only be unblocked once you can convince an administrator that the block is no longer necessary. For this reason, please use the article's talk page, discuss the content and come to some form of consensus before trying to reinsert the material into the article. - Aoidh (talk) 01:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody helps anyone here. Here you are only dedicated to blocking and reverting edits. Without thinking about the time and dedication that the user has invested in collecting information to create a good article.

You don't argue, you have the power to block and that's the only thing you do, but you don't create good articles. Nottedeluce (talk) 01:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many editors put time and dedication into improving and maintaining articles including Nicholas Hoult, but that does not mean that your edits cannot be challenged if there are issues with them. When you say nobody helps anyone here I don't see that you have asked for any help, and until you were blocked have not used a talk page of any kind since 2015. Use the article's talk page (especially if you don't understand why you're being reverted) and discuss the content. Wikipedia is a collaborative project meaning we work together to try to make the best version of each article and sometimes we disagree on how to do that which is why edit warring is a problem and using talk pages is such a good idea. It does not matter how much time and dedication you put into content if you are unwilling to work together with other editors, which means using the talk page to discuss the issues with the content and figuring out how to best improve the article, instead of trying to force your version of the article by repeatedly reinserting your version when it is challenged or reverted, which is edit warring. - Aoidh (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Aoidh. Nottedeluce is back to reverting. Their responses on the article's talk page only assert they should be allowed to reinstate the previous major edits rather than explain why they were constructive. KyleJoan^talk 13:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't reverted anything. I have created. have you read? The information is true and neutral, why don't you let me write a good article, what problem do you have with me? Nottedeluce (talk) 18:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Nicholas Hoult.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 14:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments here as well as the above discussion indicate that you do not intend to cease edit warring. Partially reverting as you did here immediately after being unblocked is still edit warring and reflect your stated intention to continue edit warring. For that reason you have been indefinitely blocked until you can convince an administrator that you understand what edit warring is, why it is disruptive, and that you do not intend to continue doing so. I highly suggest reading Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks before attempting to make any unblock request. - Aoidh (talk) 14:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have blocked me again, and you haven't even given me the opportunity to know why my work is bad, I just want to create a good article, and if you block me, I can't write a good article.

If my writing is truthful and neutral, where is the problem? please unblock me. I try to be better. Nottedeluce (talk) 18:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm not creating any conflict! It is you who do not let me write, but you also do not help to improve the errors that I do not know what they are. Is it so hard to understand? I don't want a war of editions, I just want an updated and true article. Nottedeluce (talk) 18:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want a war!!! But look, no one is helping me, where is the help? You just blocked me again. Is that help between editors? Why don't you put yourself in my shoes.

I just hope that you unblock me and I can start again, creating a good article. It's the only thing I want.

I apologize for the inconvenience this may have caused you. Nottedeluce (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to acknowledge that I have read your responses, but these comments in no way address or even acknowledge the reason you were blocked. - Aoidh (talk) 19:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to make a good article.

I promise that I will use the discussion page, where I will post all the changes, so that other users can comment.

Please unblock me. I promise that I will use the talk page to talk to other users. Nottedeluce (talk) 19:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to make an unblock request using the instructions provided above. I suggest reading Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks before making the request, and I want to reiterate that I will post all the changes suggest you may intend to continue making the changes without a consensus, even though it is clear on the article's talk page that these changes are disputed; you need to be unambiguously clear that you both understand what edit warring is, and that you will cease doing so. - Aoidh (talk) 19:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I promise I don't want to create a war, I'm going to use the article discussion page to modify articles.

Please unblock me, I just want to do things right. Nottedeluce (talk) 19:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, you will need to make an unblock request using the instructions provided above. - Aoidh (talk) 20:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nottedeluce (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. They blocked me because I didn't use the talk pages to edit articles. I promise I'll use the talk pages from now on. I will not enter into an edition war. Please unblock me. I just want to learn and do things well. Forgive any inconvenience caused Nottedeluce (talk) 20:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you've bothered to read and understand WP:EW. I mean, you didn't even get the terminology correct. Yamla (talk) 21:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Yamla unblock me. I'm going to try to do my best and learn. We all make mistakes and have errors. Don't block my desire to create good articles. Please. Thank you.

Sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nottedeluce. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 10:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nux (Mad Max) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nux (Mad Max) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nux (Mad Max) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Neocorelight (Talk) 09:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]