User talk:NotablePeopleFan

Welcome!

Hello, NotablePeopleFan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Isaiah Jones, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 07:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Isaiah Jones

The article Isaiah Jones has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 07:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May you add the references?--NotablePeopleFan (talk) 08:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kanye West presidential campaign, 2020 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kanye West presidential campaign, 2020 was changed by NotablePeopleFan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.991316 on 2016-10-02T01:32:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:32, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Isaiah Jones

The article Isaiah Jones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

College athlete, does not appear to meet WP:NCOLLATH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melcous (talk) 13:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 East Carolina University protests, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Medium and RESIST. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gateway Residence Hall

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Gateway Residence Hall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. » Shadowowl | talk 10:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gateway Residence Hall

The article Gateway Residence Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable building.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 05:14, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gateway Residence Hall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gateway Residence Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gateway Residence Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 13:26, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gateway Residence Hall

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gateway Residence Hall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:08, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mannequin Challenge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mannequin Challenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannequin Challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NikolaiHo^☎️ 01:57, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mannequin Challenge

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mannequin Challenge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article deletion

Hi, I am Nikolaiho. I have noticed that all of the articles you have created are either deleted or are being nominated for deletion. I would just like to remind you to consider some things before creating another article:

Is the article notable?
Does the article contain reliable sources?
Might the article be deleted according to criteria for speedy deletion?

Try to make sure all of the articles you create consider the above. If you need help, contact me. --NikolaiHo^☎️ 00:25, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If most are nominated for deletion, then kept, I don't feel that is a problem.--NotablePeopleFan (talk) 17:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I would say that if most are nominated and then kept, that would suggest that some other editors would consider that the initial article may be lacking something that shows it is a sufficiently notable subject (e.g. too short, or not enough reliable sources). We are all here to produce a diverse and comprehensive encyclopedia, so if you would like help on article creation (e.g. how to add sources, or what else you can do when starting an article), please feel free to drop me a line - I am here to help. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 12:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Callmemirela. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Protests against Donald Trump without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dat Boi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 02:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trump's Coming Challenge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trump's Coming Challenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump's Coming Challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 12:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]