User talk:NotYetAnotherEconomist

Welcome!

Hello, NotYetAnotherEconomist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BarsofGold (talk) 20:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NotYetAnotherEconomist, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NotYetAnotherEconomist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy

Hi, NotYetAnotherEconomist. Common sense ought to inform you that the sentences "If you place a banner for an outside WikiProject, and a member of that project removes it, do not replace the banner. A WikiProject's members have the exclusive right to define the scope of their project, which includes defining an article as being outside the scope of the project." don't mean you can remove a banner, and then, when you meet opposition, go join the relevant wikiproject in order to remove the banner yet again. Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, and your use of the quoted guideline WP:PROJGUIDE#OWN is what we call wikilawyering (please click on that link). Please do not remove the banner again without getting consensus for that action on the talkpage, or alternatively at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Economics, or you may be blocked for disruptive editing and edit warring. Bishonen | talk 14:26, 15 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Who are you? NotYetAnotherEconomist (talk) 14:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm an administrator. I watch User:Randykitty's talkpage, and noticed the discussion there. Bishonen | talk 14:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]
  - Do you understand what wikilawyering means? NotYetAnotherEconomist (talk) 14:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Do I understand...huh? When words in the text on these pages are blue, it means they're links. Did you click on the link to wikilawyering..? That's what the word means. Bishonen | talk 14:48, 15 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]
      - you seem stupid NotYetAnotherEconomist (talk) 14:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        And you seem intent on wasting my time. I won't post again, unless it turns out I need to block you. Bishonen | talk 14:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

August 2014

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:NotYetAnotherEconomist#Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Randykitty (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Can I block you two from teaming up on me? Why don't you do something useful. Also that wasn't an attack. If you could read the previous message you would agree that the user in question seems stupid. NotYetAnotherEconomist (talk) 15:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. You are storming about the discussions with a very confrontational approach. We work in Wikipedia to achieve consensus and your remarks are not helpful in achieving project improvement. – S. Rich (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How are threats to block me helping in achieving project improvment? Please explain in great detail. I rather spend my time fixing the WP than arguing against Wikipedia Powerusers. NotYetAnotherEconomist (talk) 17:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

NotYetAnotherEconomist, I said I wouldn't come here until I was ready to block, but I've decided you should have one more warning. (Warnings aren't "threats", by the way. You wouldn't like to be blocked without having been warned, would you?)

I'm surprised to see you continue your wikilawyering on User:Onorem's page, considering you must be aware of the reception of those claims of yours at WikiProjectEconomics. You didn't even link Onorem to the discussion. I'm assuming that was an oversight on your part, and not an attempt to deceive him/her. But you need to stop this, as it's becoming more and more disruptive. And stop with the assumptions of bad faith, that I see on the WikiProject page.[1]. No, Randykitty and I aren't "friends", and I've never even spoken with Headbomb as far as I know. Is it so impossible to believe that several people can find you to be wrong, without being in a conspiracy against you? After all, you're a new user, and Wikipedia is complicated. It's not surprising that you need some advice from experienced users. Blowing them off with sneers about "musketeers" and "some more of your friends" is a very poor idea, as well as violating the policies Assume good faith and No personal attacks. If you keep on with this battleground editing, I will block you. This is the last warning you'll receive for your disruptive edits. Bishonen | talk 17:24, 16 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

can you please read the page yourself. You would then have noticed that he is fully aware of the discussion. please stop bothering me with your threats. Pretty much everything is more important than wasting time arguing against some annyoing wikipedia powerusers. Now go away. NotYetAnotherEconomist (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Also I haven't even removed the project banner because I already learnt that there are some people on wikipedia that have too much time. NotYetAnotherEconomist (talk) 17:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]