User talk:BarsofGold

This user may have left Wikipedia. BarsofGold has not edited Wikipedia since 25 November 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This is BarsofGold's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Edit on page

The picture is taken in the pier, what's wrong with it? Gordon, J. G. (talk) 17:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a picture of a fan and it's too large. I don't believe it contributes to the page at all.--BarsofGold (talk) 17:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, where's the standing fan in the picture? I don't see it. Gordon, J. G. (talk) 17:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)}[reply]

What? You can clearly see it is a picture of a fan.--BarsofGold (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The picture is taken inside the pier. When you said fan, are you referring to standing fan? Gordon, J. G. (talk) 17:25, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well it looks like a fan on the ceiling to me.--BarsofGold (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a background, the picture is to show a vaulted ceiling. Gordon, J. G. (talk) 17:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That may be but there is still the issue that the image is to large and doesn't really improve the page.--BarsofGold (talk) 17:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image could be shrunken. Gordon, J. G. (talk) 17:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For info: I have indef. blocked User:Gordon J. G for block evasion. He's been posting this photo all over the place today. —SMALL JIM 19:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok thank you for telling me. I will keep an eye out for it in the future.--BarsofGold (talk) 19:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

How are you doing? Vvvgcfff (talk) 04:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am very good thank you. --BarsofGold (talk) 04:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you like my edits? Vvvgcfff (talk) 04:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well that is a difficult question. Your edits all seem to be made in good faith but I don't dislike them.--BarsofGold (talk) 04:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And did you like the picture I added? There weren't pictures of recessed light so I added one. Vvvgcfff (talk) 04:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the person who keeps using multiple accounts to insert pictures of fans to articles?--BarsofGold (talk) 04:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, no! I'm very new here! I just couldn't take a clear picture of light. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vvvgcfff (talk • contribs) 04:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I am not at all convinced by that. I have already had to deal with about 4 of them and it's starting to annoy me.--BarsofGold (talk) 04:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which users? Vvvgcfff (talk) 04:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I can't remember all of their names but one of the accounts is listed above talk page section. All the accounts doing the similar behaviour as you all seemed to be operated by the same person.--BarsofGold (talk) 04:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Mark Petrakis article

Hello, BarsofGold, I hope you still work at Wikipedia...in my Harry Mark Petrakis article, there is a link to his official website (at the bottom). When one clicks on the link, one is taken to the official website = http://www.harrymarkpetrakis.com/. When one clicks on "MEDIA," there is a link to my Wikipedia article. THE LINK IS A DEAD LINK. It is a dead link because there needs to be a space after the "s" of "Petrakis." Can you add the space?Lambrini Papangelis (talk) 10:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lambrini Papangelis here. I copied the Harry Mark Petrakis article from my Sandbox and pasted into the current Wikipedia article "Harry Mark Petrakis." Since that article was only one paragraph long, I figured mine was better. But now when I go to that article, all I find is the old, one-paragraph article. BarsofGold, I made a lot of changes. Is my work lost? Can you retrieve it for me? I mean the content I tried to replace the old article with. Is my work lost? Lambrini Papangelis (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I understand that you were trying to improve the article but your version needed a lot of cleaning up and could not be left there. If you want to see it again just look at the page history and click on difference between revisions.--BarsofGold (talk) 05:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BarsofGold, the reason my article needed a lot of cleaning up is that when I tried to replace the old HMP article with it, all kinds of things disappeared! Like, for example, all the italics of the book titles. I had to put them back. It took a long time. I had to clean up other things, too, for instance adding about 100 line breaks. Please, BarsofGold: if I make my Sandbox copy perfect, will you mount it for me?Lambrini Papangelis (talk) 06:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have put a link on your talk page to something called the Teahouse. It is a place for new users to ask questions to experienced editors about how to edit. I recomend you seek advice there. Happy editing!--BarsofGold (talk) 10:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BoG: If a new editor's work needs "cleaning up", please do so (as I have now done), instead of removing it, and doing so with no meaningful edit summary, nor talk page explanation until prompted. Please` think how your would feel, if your contributions to a new project were treated like that. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NEW INFORMATION, 11:30 a.m. Central, OCT. 19, 2014 Dear Andy,

Harry Mark Petrakis's new (2014) autobiography has been published. It is titled "Song of My Life" and I have added numerous bibliographic citations from it to the "Harry Mark Petrakis" article. Please approve them. Thank you! Lambrini Papangelis ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lambrini Papangelis (talk • contribs) 16:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Halo 4

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Halo 4 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Halo 4

The article Halo 4 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Halo 4 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 12:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for welcoming me to Wikipedia! Hope to talk to you sometime soon, (HEROBRINEROXTHEWORLD (talk) 04:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC))[reply]

That's ok I hope you enjoy editing here.--BarsofGold (talk) 04:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question related to WikiProjects

Hi BarsofGold, thanks for warm welcome! I have a question regarding the creation of new WikiProjects. I've created a proposal regarding esports and I am convinced there are others who would like to contribute to this sort of project. However, the list of people who are actively involved in the discussion/voting process of the creation of new WikiProjects seems to be limited. I would like to know if there is a place to ask/recruit others who might be interested in the contributing to the creation/development of this WikiProject. The reason I'm asking you is because I wouldn't like to come off as rude by asking people in the wrong places. Would the talk page of WikiProject Video Games be an appropriate place? -- Solomonarius (talk) 06:10, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. It may take some time for people to notice new projects and join them. I think it would be a good idea to post your idea on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games to get some feedback from other users who edit gaming related articles.--BarsofGold (talk) 06:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

Hi BarsofGold, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism, spam and blatantly unconstructive edits; using it to revert any other type of edit - such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with - can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, as some admins do not warn if they become aware of any rollback misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, you should use a manual edit summary instead of the rollback tool. For practice, you may wish to review Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 22:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very muck!--BarsofGold (talk) 22:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"local churches..." In considered undoing the recent deletion, but I saw that most of that text duplicated the previous paragraph. MaynardClark (talk) 03:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shakti Mohan

I removed the deletion request because it was kept for deletion when there was no references to the information given but the references are now added. Thank you. Would mention the reason in summary when I make changes! :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.101.67.11 (talk) 04:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. An administrator will take a look at the page and decide wether to keep or delete the page.--BarsofGold (talk) 04:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 175.101.67.11 (talk) 04:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

images

how can i upload images — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditya pujari sagar (talk • contribs) 04:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure. I recommend you ask at the Teahouse. The Teahouse is were you can ask questions to experienced editors.--BarsofGold (talk) 04:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halo 4

Hey, just wondering if you're planning to do the review soon? I can put it on hold for longer if you need more time? I think all that needs addressing now are a few prose issues but the references are a slight larger problem. Anyway, please let me know! Regards ☠ Jaguar ☠ 21:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm still going to work on it. I've just been having difficulties doing the references because I'm using a tablet. I may have to remove the dead links and re-add them when I get my computer back again. I don't think it needs to be put on hold for a longer time though.--BarsofGold (talk) 22:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I understand how awkward it can be using a tablet (or any touch screen really) for Wikipedia! Let me know if you need any more time at all. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 22:09, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just letting you know that I closed the GAN as I thought you were too busy to handle it. But don't worry, let me know as soon as you're ready again and I can speedily review it? All that needs addressing are the references and the prose in the lead - not a huge deal! Thanks, ☠ Jaguar ☠ 19:55, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have written the report there. Thank you...149.140.10.166 (talk) 06:35, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok.--BarsofGold (talk) 09:21, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message

Sorry I did not follow protocol. The text I removed was redundant -- the same sentence appeared twice. You might want to doublecheck what you restored -- I don't remember what the page was. Thanks!

Your GA nomination of Halo 4

The article Halo 4 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Halo 4 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 10:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow thank you! I'll try to help out whenever I have time.--BarsofGold (talk) 08:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BarsofGold. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]