User talk:NotWith
|
||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 300 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 15 sections are present. |
A page you started (Rutoideae) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Rutoideae, NotWith!
Wikipedia editor Missionedit just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank You!
To reply, leave a comment on Missionedit's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
[edit]- please help translate this message into the local language
|
The Cure Award |
| In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! |
We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)
Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation
A page you started (Albuca fastigiata) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Albuca fastigiata, NotWith!
Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please consider balancing the chemical composition of your plant articles with basic biology (morphology, distribution) to appeal to a wider audience, and remember to put a Project banner (e.g. WikiProject Plants) on the Talk page. Cheers!
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
The article Cheiracanthium cuniculum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is an orphan article because reliable sources, such as the World Spider Catalog here, regard it as a "nomen dubium" (dubious name), i.e. it's likely that the name does not actually refer to a species of spider. Hence it's not even linked from the genus article, Cheiracanthium.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
"Fruit vegetable" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fruit vegetable and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 20#Fruit vegetable until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 13:13, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The article 6479 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Useless disambiguation page with no valid entries. The first item, "7th millennium", doesn't exist as an article, and the page you end up at, Timeline of the far future, does not mention the year 6479, because there is nothing to say about it. The second entry fails MOS:DABNOENTRY because it is a DAB entry from a piece of trivia. No one ever calls Barbalin, Western Australia "6479" so Barbalin, Western Australia is not ambiguous with the title of this DAB page. 6479 Leoconnolly is a Partial title match and is also not particularly ambiguous with "6479".
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 18:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Category:Lists of Lepidoptera genera (alphabetic) has been nominated for merging
[edit]
Category:Lists of Lepidoptera genera (alphabetic) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
"Hirsutissima" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hirsutissima and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 11 § Hirsutissima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew (talk) 17:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hypobathreae
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:Hypobathreae indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
"Epiphytum" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Epiphytum has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 30 § Epiphytum until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 01:05, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Tegenaria rhodiensis for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tegenaria rhodiensis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Equalwidth (C) 10:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Limosa (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Limosa (disambiguation) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limosa (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TPPD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.RodrigoIPacce (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
The article List of fishes of Metropolitan France has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A list with this title and only two fishes is worse than no article. Looking at the List of fish of Europe template, shows that no other nation in Europe has a list. I think this is better deleted.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 03:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)