User talk:NotPeterParker

Welcome!

Hello, NotPeterParker! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 13:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Manosphere

I reverted your recent edit to the article since it did not cite reliable secondary sources and linked to a movie clip on youtube (which is likely a copyright violation) instead. Also the content you added is IMO undue and qualifies as original research. You are welcome to discuss the issue at Talk:Manosphere but note that repeatedly re-adding the content without first establishing consensus for its inclusion will likely get you blocked from editing the article, the topic, or wikipedia altogether. Abecedare (talk) 21:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings NotPeterParker. An invitation to discuss suggested changes on the article talk page is not an invitation to air your grievances with the article or with other editors, or to engage in general discussion of the topic without citing published, reliable sources. If you have problems with a given source such as Donna Zuckerberg, then it's on you to show how the source is misused with reference to other existing sources and/or WP's policies and guidelines. For now I've removed your comments according to the talk page guidelines. Thank you. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kingsman: The Secret Service, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The source currently provided doesn't make this claim. DonIago (talk) 15:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit for Sports

Hi there. I reverted your last edit here at Sports because you did not provide a source for your information and the current citation after that sentence from Contact Music does not corroborate your claim. If you have a new, reliable source that backs up your claim, please re-add the information and then properly cite the source. Thank you. —The Keymaster (talk) 04:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I have reverted your similar edits at Purple Rain because you did not provide a source there, either. The Keymaster (talk) 04:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert at computer science

Hello,

You made some edits to an established page, computer science that were subsequently reverted. Please keep in mind that according to the rules of good faith on Wikipedia, it's important to avoid disruptive changes and edit wars. Instead of reinstating your edits, please post on the talk page first to get consensus for any changes.

In this case your (uncited) removal directly contradicts citations to the sentence in question, which state that CS is about automation:

> The discipline of computing is the systematic study of algorithmic processes that describe and transform information, their theory, analysis, design, efficiency, implementation, and application. The fundamental question underlying all of computing is, 'What can be (efficiently) automated?

If you have any further questions about your proposed changes, please post on the talk page and provide citations to support your claims. Uncited edits are usually removed on Wikipedia.

Kind regards, Caleb Stanford (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at IMDb, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Calling IMDb "authoritative" without any clarifications or a source backing it up is a uselessly broad statement, and needs to be supported by at least one reference. DonIago (talk) 13:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concert films list - October 2023

Regarding the table in Concert film, it's the general norm to keep any table or list, be it a collection of highest-selling stuff or a compilation of year-end rankings, to the top-10 to abide WP:INDISCRIMINATE. I'll let this one pass as you've added only two more positions. However, if more films are set to the join the list in the future, it's of importance to keep the list to the top-10 as Wikipedia is not an endless library of data. This is a constructive note to you. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 05:08, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at LeBron James, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 22:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to African Americans, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I'm referring to your remark at User talk:MonsenorNouel‎ about non-Black editors. Rsk6400 (talk) 20:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That sort of remark is explicitly mentioned at WP:NPA as a type of personal attack. Please stop. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to strike or revert your last post[1] at Talk:African Americans, see WP:TPNO. Rsk6400 (talk) 11:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is NotPeterParker. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Because of your edits that are gatekeeping on articles, claiming people cannot edit an article because of their race or nationality, and then also pretending to be an admin by stating you'll ban users when you can't, you are clearly not here to build an encyclopaedia. Canterbury Tail talk 17:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 17:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NotPeterParker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We are having a discussion about a non-trivial topic (how to define/label a specific group of people amongst a melting pot). Surely the threads themselves show that there is prejuice among the crowd, and that is what is keeping progress on what should be a simple definition stagnate.

There is no need to put an indefinite block on, as this account is not vandalizing the encyclopedia and has been making regular contributions. My suggestion is that it may be best for an Admin to join the conversation at Talk:African Americans so that the editors can come to a WP:Consensus instead of just siding with those who have more edits and are clearly trying to confuse readers of the article.

And by getting so-and-so banned, this type of action (getting an Administrator to do so) is what I meant, not that I could do it. Thanks. NotPeterParker (talk) 18:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I can accept that you weren't pretending to be an admin, but I find your other behavior thoroughly unacceptable, and I decline to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 19:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is concerning this ANI thread. Canterbury Tail talk 19:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]