User talk:NotCory

Welcome!

Hello, CodeNameBOSS! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 07:05, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:NotCory/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:NotCory/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NotCory! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 07:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:List of Rede Globo affiliated stations has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Rede Globo affiliated stations. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 23:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April Fools' Day jokes in mainspace

Hello NotCory. Please do not add April Fools' Day Jokes in the mainspace; see Wikipedia:Rules for Fools. If you are creating a joke deletion nomination, you may not add an AfD banner to the top of the reader-facing article, and you must immediately remove the code that says {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD}} from the discussion (otherwise a bot will add an AfD banner to the top of the article automatically). I have already fixed this for you. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Rede Globo affiliated stations

Hello, NotCory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Rede Globo affiliated stations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lenovo template

Hello! Sorry, some users (include me) sees a Lenovo template as broken (e.g initially collapsed without expand ability). You can reproduce this effect after switching to a page that uses this template. I also have this issue, using different browsers (FF/Chromium/GD Safari), with cleaned cookies and disabled AdBlock/NoScript. What You think, can someone make disruptive edit after integration of new internal logic, or this a former issue? Do You see any problems here? Thanks. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ThisIsNotABetter: I did changes to this template (as well as several other ones) to use includeonly so that each section can be shown or hidden (more specifically, to show only their phones in Template:Android smartphones). Unfortunately, this comes at cost of having templates showing nothing if no parameters are specified. You can fix the problem in affected articles by putting in the template like this:

{{Lenovo|servers=yes|workstations=yes|desktops=yes|laptops=yes|tablets=yes|phones=yes|other=yes|acquisitions=yes|other2=yes|below=yes}}

It should produce this template in full:

NotCory (talk) 12:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explanation! but, so, as I see, circa ~1000 pages needs a expanding of included templates (for example, all pages with "Samsung smartphones", "Lenovo", "Xiaomi" templates, etc.). The current version make all this integrated templates simply blank, so - I think, ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 07:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I try to rewrite templates with initially expanded version with hiding options, but this is not a swift solution. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 07:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Channel 33 branded TV stations in the United States

The article Channel 33 branded TV stations in the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This list with one entry is not an aid to navigation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:AMD Ryzen 4000 series

Template:AMD Ryzen 4000 series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:12, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:NewHikaru07, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ZLEA _T\^C 18:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]