User talk:NotAdamKovic

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, NotAdamKovic! Thank you for your contributions. I am Lepricavark and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Lepricavark (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NotAdamKovic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sergio Campbell, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 07:01, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate. Bit of a late response, apologies. I added in a source when redoing the edit, but to my knowledge citations are given rarely, if ever to the edit I made, which was updating Campbell's current team and evidence of going onto other footballers notes this. Therefore, I reckon my original edit was fine. Like I said though, I added a link to the AFC Ann Arbor roster in the edit notes for further reference. Cheers, and thanks for the attempts to help out! NotAdamKovic (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool FC Transfers

Hello, I understand your view point but as players are contract to a football club as a whole and not a particular age or profession level then they should all appear here as Ins and Outs from Liverpool F.C.. It's also about being consistent with other season articles such as Manchester City, Chelsea, Newcastle United, Arsenal etc...Please revert back to my edit please or I will seek advice elsewhere as the article in discussion is the only one that doesn't include them. Thanks --Skyblueshaun (talk) 15:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Skyblueshaun: Hi mate. First, I appreciate you responding, discussion is key here. I'm glad we're both in understanding that neither of us are trying to be rude.

As for the Ins and Outs, again, I understand what you're saying, but as I mentioned on the talk page, each team has a different way. Citing other 2018-19 pages is, for the time being, not the best precedent as I would assume they're going through similar discussions as this one. I would direct your attention to Newcastle United who do not have academy releases/incoming listed. Another great example of this is Southampton F.C. from 2017-18, of whom the Liverpool pages are very much near identical. Even the 2017-18 page of Chelsea F.C. is formatted slightly differently with academy releases in their own section. My point generally is that we should look not discount Liverpool's established precedent for its pages. Yes, the youth players may be contracted to Liverpool F.C., but again as I mentioned, this is a page for the first team's season. Of course, this isn't the world's biggest deal, but I do think that the current precedent is set among the Liverpool pages and that goes a long way. (With your permission, I would be open to copy/pasting this bit of discussion from my user page to the talk page of the article, for others to potentially weigh-in on. I would remove this part in parenthesis.) NotAdamKovic (talk) 15:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I really think we should include Academy players, as long as it's identified weather the player was first team or part of the u23's, academy etc then no problem is in it what so ever. I also think it'll improve the page as it does on 2018–19 Manchester City F.C. season, 2018–19 Arsenal F.C. season and 2018–19 Middlesbrough F.C. season. Bigger clubs are known to have better youth players which do sadly get loaned out so it'll be good to appreciate these moves in their young careers. Please let us include this on Liverpool F.C. season page. --Skyblueshaun (talk) 18:01, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Okumu

Your edit has been challenged and reverted. Per WP:BRD, gain consensus on the article talk page before re-adding it. Giant Snowman 14:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rosters

Please provide explanations/sources for your changes to rosters. Giant Snowman 15:51, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NotAdamKovic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Afc ann arbor.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pedro Martinez Jr.

Hello, NotAdamKovic. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pedro Martinez Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wyandotte, Michigan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 17:35, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wyandotte, Michigan

It's not that hard to put in citations. It fixes the problem and ends the dispute. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:17, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Danny Woodrow" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Danny Woodrow and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 13#Danny Woodrow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox stats

Please note that we only include domestic league games in the infobox - so no Cup or Continental matches etc. Please also ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. Giant Snowman 15:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Bryant Packard" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bryant Packard has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3 § Bryant Packard until a consensus is reached. Hog Farm _Talk 02:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]