User talk:Norway is cool

This is Norway is cool's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia's Shortest Article (October 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Norway is cool! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Wikipedia's Shortest Article

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Wikipedia's Shortest Article, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BangJan1999 15:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|You see an article that I edited The State Of dessert Article and it had no vandalism ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You see an article that I edited The State Of dessert Article and it had no vandalism Norway is cool (talk) 13:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Everyone

i cant do much currently because I am blocked for "vandalism" Wikipedia I am sorry for something I did not do Norway is cool (talk) 13:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock

{unblock|}You see an article that I edited The State Of dessert Article and it had no vandalism in it yet I edited it I'm not trying to vandalize I'm trying to help Wikipedia and make it an accurate source you guys are being ungrateful} Norway is cool (talk) 13:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did nothing wrong I assume my case Norway is cool (talk) 13:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Big Inpact:

an article I had edited The State of Desert had gotten 1,526 people looking at it Norway is cool (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair Blocking

Because Articled Have Been created How this vandalism @Bbb23 Is unfair to me and others Norway is cool (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make a legitimate unblock request, fine; if you continue to troll, I will revoke Talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]