User talk:Northmop
Draft of a new article
[edit]Speedy deletion nomination of File:James Martin (Minnesota politician).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
A tag has been placed on File:James Martin (Minnesota politician).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Northmop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft talk:James Martin (Minnesota politician), which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, Marchjuly, and thank you for your kind words. Would you be so kind as to tell me the conflict of interest you believe exists? Northmop (talk) 22:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- As I mentioned in my post on Fasily's user talk page, I added this template because it not only contains information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for COI editing, but also because it contain links to other general pages about Wikipedia editing. When someone who hasn't edited in years returns to suddenly try and create an article about a questionably Wikipedia notable subject, there is often a concern as to why they are doing that. Anyway, I wasn't accusing you of any wrong doing; I was just only trying to make you aware of relevant policies and guideline just in case they might apply to your situation. If, however, you're not connected to Martin in any way and just want to create an article about him, then just ignore the template I added (you can even remove it if you want) and just keep working on the draft.I did notice that the draft has already been nominated for deletion by another editor named Orange Mike; so, perhaps I'm not the only editor who thought the claim for Wikipedia notability for him is a bit iffy. Even though I think what SmokeyJoe posted about this being still only a draft is correct and as a draft this is probably OK to keep, I don't think this would survive a deletion discussion if this were an article. So, you should try to look for other significant coverage about Martin that goes beyond the lawsuit, etc. if you want to strengthen a case that an article should be written about him. He may be destined for great things as a politician and may be a great person, but unless he can meet WP:BIO (i.e. WP:POLITICIAN) or WP:GNG, it might be WP:TOOSOON for an article to be written about him. That doesn't mean, however, that you can continue to work on the draft. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, Marchjuly, for the reply. I'll make sure to keep all of this in mind. Northmop (talk) 08:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- As I mentioned in my post on Fasily's user talk page, I added this template because it not only contains information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for COI editing, but also because it contain links to other general pages about Wikipedia editing. When someone who hasn't edited in years returns to suddenly try and create an article about a questionably Wikipedia notable subject, there is often a concern as to why they are doing that. Anyway, I wasn't accusing you of any wrong doing; I was just only trying to make you aware of relevant policies and guideline just in case they might apply to your situation. If, however, you're not connected to Martin in any way and just want to create an article about him, then just ignore the template I added (you can even remove it if you want) and just keep working on the draft.I did notice that the draft has already been nominated for deletion by another editor named Orange Mike; so, perhaps I'm not the only editor who thought the claim for Wikipedia notability for him is a bit iffy. Even though I think what SmokeyJoe posted about this being still only a draft is correct and as a draft this is probably OK to keep, I don't think this would survive a deletion discussion if this were an article. So, you should try to look for other significant coverage about Martin that goes beyond the lawsuit, etc. if you want to strengthen a case that an article should be written about him. He may be destined for great things as a politician and may be a great person, but unless he can meet WP:BIO (i.e. WP:POLITICIAN) or WP:GNG, it might be WP:TOOSOON for an article to be written about him. That doesn't mean, however, that you can continue to work on the draft. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Draft:James Martin (Minnesota politician)
[edit]
Draft:James Martin (Minnesota politician), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:James Martin (Minnesota politician) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:James Martin (Minnesota politician) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 23:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:James Martin (Minnesota politician), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:James Martin (Minnesota politician)
[edit]
Hello, Northmop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James Martin".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Majash2020 (talk) 03:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, Majash2020. I thought there was going to be more to this fellow, but it turns out there was not.
Northmop (talk) 14:33, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lock Dam 1 1959.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Lock Dam 1 1959.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
