User talk:Northamerica1000/Archive 104
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Northamerica1000. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 100 | ← | Archive 102 | Archive 103 | Archive 104 | Archive 105 | Archive 106 | → | Archive 110 |
indonesian project
the right hand does not know whats the other one is doing with things as simple as categories or general maintenance - dont let me start ... as for afd's I could waste a vast amount of time explaining off wiki the many issues - as for geography - thenext 79,850 stubs are due at any time now the way things look:| JarrahTree 12:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- @JarrahTree: It's unclear what you're referring to here. Could you provide more context? North America1000 13:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- my ranting and raving about the issue of whether 80,000 + indonesian villages are inherently notable - and the right for new eds to randomly collect and play with un-notable locations - the project lacks coherence as to its various category trees and things.. JarrahTree 13:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- @JarrahTree: I took a look at the WP Indonesia talk page. I don't think I want to get involved in any of this at this time. North America1000 15:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- my ranting and raving about the issue of whether 80,000 + indonesian villages are inherently notable - and the right for new eds to randomly collect and play with un-notable locations - the project lacks coherence as to its various category trees and things.. JarrahTree 13:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
re: Portal:Scotland
Hi NA1K, thanks for your message about the portal. Sorry for not responding sooner, but I've not been very active recently. There's been a Covid-19 crisis involving a close relative which was causing me a great deal of concern for a while. Thankfully it's pretty much resolved and all OK now. I see that some hasty work by Andrybak seems to have fixed it, so thanks to them for that, but having a look back in the history at earlier versions I can see the issue that you described. It's strange because it seems to be replicating an issue that was widespread a few months back, caused by some modifications that were made to the relevant modules code I seem to recall, but these were fixed after a Phabricator ticket was raised. I'm not sure if this is the same issue or not, I'll mention it to Certes who was involved with the original issue. Thanks for bringing this to community attention and enabling a rapid fix. --Cactus.man ✍ 19:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Cactus.man: Sorry to hear about your crisis. Despite the headlines, most people recover quickly and I hope your relative is no exception.
- Thanks for the ping. I don't know what caused the problem. Other editors solved it while I was investigating, so I dropped the case. Certes (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Cactus.man: Glad to hear that all is stable after your relative's illness. Well, the Scotland portal is still rendering correctly as of this post. Also thanks to Certes for stopping by. You both can feel free to keep in touch anytime. North America1000 16:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2020)
The potato (Solanum tuberosum) is an example of a New World crop, a crop native to the New World (mostly the Americas) before 1492 CE and not found anywhere else at that time.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Double standard • Teenage rebellion Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
G13 Eligibility Notice
The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.
Thanks, MDanielsBot (talk) 04:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Nomination of ITyphoon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITyphoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITyphoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CatcherStorm talk 13:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- FileImporter and FileExporter became standard features on all Wikis during the first week of August. They help you transfer files from local wikis to Wikimedia Commons with the original file information and history intact. [1]
Problems
- The mobile skin displays a message at the bottom of the page about who edited last. This message showed raw wikitext. This has now been fixed. Some messages in Structured Discussions and content translation may still appear as raw wikitext. Developers are working on it. [2]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from August 11. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from August 12. It will be on all wikis from August 13 (calendar).
Future changes
- All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on September 1. This is planned between 13:30 and 15:30 UTC. More information will be published in Tech News and will also be posted on individual wikis in the coming weeks. [3][4]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2020)
Abraham Ortelius's world map, from the Typus Orbis Terrarum ("Theatre of the Orb of the World") atlas, first published in 1564
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: New World crops • Double standard Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- If you revert an edit using the undo link your edit is marked with an
undo
tag. This will now only happen if you don't change anything in the edit window before publishing the undo. This is to keep users from marking edits as undos when they actually do something else. [5] - The new OOUI version will not work with Internet Explorer 8. This means the wikis will look strange and not work well in Internet Explorer 8. This was reported in Tech/News/2020/17. This is because keeping the wikis working with very old browsers creates other problems. [6]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 18 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 19 August. It will be on all wikis from 20 August (calendar).
Future changes
- All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on September 1. This is planned between 13:30 and 15:30 UTC. More information will be published in Tech News and will also be posted on individual wikis next week. This is a reminder. You can help by translating the announcement message. [7][8]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
IABotManagementConsole [1.2]
Northamerica1000, I've used the IABotManagement Console a few times, which links internally here and externally where I've used it via toolforge here, (which includes an option to "Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)") and up until a few days ago, only on pages where I am very familiar with the References (mostly articles I've created or contributed substantially).
While cleaning the article Mercy (Duffy song) (diff) posted on Wikipedia:Cleanup, the bot edit summary was: (Rescuing 68 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.1).
I circled back to have a closer look at what the bot had done, (it has no option to verify before submitting), and to my surprise saw that it actually adds to References, archived pages with "not found errors" aka dead links, that have been previously captured at the Wayback Machine! Unfortunately, I wasn't able to rollback my edit and spent almost 2 hours verifying each reference all to manually revert 2 of them.
As much as I like that tool, and knowing that you need to use it responsibly, I doubt that most will realize that the bot is adding dead archived links to References. I'm seeing more editors using the tool. Is there a reason to be concerned here? Thanks! — WILDSTARtalk 20:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @WildStar: I recommend contacting Cyberpower678, the publisher of the script. There is also a link atop this page to submit a bug report. Regarding the references with links to archived pages then being marked as a dead link, it sounds like the script is trying to correct something that was already corrected, making the reference incorrect in the process. North America1000 14:19, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Nb. @WildStar: See also: User talk:cyberpower678 § As IABot continues to create damage to the project, request to stop IABot until the problem is fixed. North America1000 06:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
I split white pizza, I am surprise this didn't have an article until now. The article could use some expansion. Valoem talk contrib 22:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Archive subpages
Hello. Years ago, you created some redirects such as Occupy Oakland/Archive 1. We're considering deleting a similar page. Several other respected editors also created /Archive pages, so I suspect that they have a purpose we've overlooked. Can you think why we might need them? Certes (talk) 21:03, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Certes: The redirect was placed in the event that someone selects the "Article" link, so that they're immediately directed to the actual article after accessing the archive pages. Looks neater than a red link too, imo. North America1000 01:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Do you want to add that point to the RfD, or shall I? It sounds as if deletion may be harmful. Certes (talk) 11:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Certes: I'll leave it to you, as I don't really feel like getting involved in this matter. Essentially, it makes no sense to have red links on the "Article" links in the upper-left hand corner of archive pages. Why would we want red links there? How would that improve navigation? Sometimes it seems that folks are so intent on deletion, that sometimes deletion may be occurring for the sake of deletion itself. Even if such redirects have not been used yet, they may be in the future. North America1000 01:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with those points and will write something on the RfD. The redirect I proposed for deletion doesn't have a corresponding talk page; the ones which do should probably stay. Certes (talk) 10:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Certes: I'll leave it to you, as I don't really feel like getting involved in this matter. Essentially, it makes no sense to have red links on the "Article" links in the upper-left hand corner of archive pages. Why would we want red links there? How would that improve navigation? Sometimes it seems that folks are so intent on deletion, that sometimes deletion may be occurring for the sake of deletion itself. Even if such redirects have not been used yet, they may be in the future. North America1000 01:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Do you want to add that point to the RfD, or shall I? It sounds as if deletion may be harmful. Certes (talk) 11:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2020)
An act is a division or unit of a theatre work, including a play, film, opera, and musical theatre. Pictured is a visual representation of the three-act structure.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: World map • New World crops Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 17 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 25 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 26 August. It will be on all wikis from 27 August (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2020)
Delivery is the process of transporting goods from a source location to a predefined destination. Pictured is a man delivering charcoal by bicycle in Uganda.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Act (drama) • World map Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- This is a reminder. All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on September 1. This is planned between 14:00 and 15:00 UTC. Please check on the details on the announcement message. [9][10]
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2020)
Skurfing as a sport has two common forms: "water skurfing" and "street skurfing". Pictured is an example of water skurfing, water skiing on a surfboard.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Delivery (commerce) • Act (drama) Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- Normally pages can be moved to a title that has no existing page yet or to a page that has only one revision, which is a redirect to the page to be moved. A new user right allows editors to move pages over one-revision pages that redirect to anywhere. [11]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 8 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 9 September. It will be on all wikis from 10 September (calendar).
- All MediaWiki API modules will now use
watchlist
instead ofwatch
. This was inconsistent before. [12]
Future changes
- The Wikipedia Android app team might work on patrolling tools in the future. You can let them know what tools would be useful for you or for less experienced patrollers. See the page on mediawiki.org.
- OTRS will be updated to a new version. This will probably take around two days. OTRS agents will not have access to the system during these days. Emails that come in during the update will be delivered when the update is done. The plan is to start around 08:00 UTC on 14 September. This could change. [13]
- The Wikipedia Android app will send push notifications if users want them. This could help you see for example when someone wrote on your talk page or your edit was reverted. This will need Google Play Services to work. It will also be possible to get the app without Google Play Services but push notifications will not work. Google Play Services is also used to make the app work for Android 4.4 users. [14][15]
- Wikimedia code review could move to GitLab. It would be hosted on Wikimedia servers. You can take part in the consultation.
- Dropdown menus in the Vector skin use a
.menu
class. This will not work in the future. Scripts can usenav ul
instead..vectorTabs
and.vectorMenu
will also not work. Some scripts need to be updated. You can read more in Phabricator.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2020)
Hello, Northamerica1000.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Skurfing (sport) • Delivery (commerce) Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Help me please with move
Hi! Help me please, brother, with moving Arena Sepsi to Sepsi Arena - that's the official name. Thanks! Rostadia2012 (talk) 18:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Rostadia2012: I recommend posting evidence regarding this at Talk:Arena Sepsi. I'd rather not perform a page move and history merge without first seeing this verified in a reliable source or two. If I'm unavailable, you can also request a page move at WP:RM. North America1000 06:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sure. I personally created this article, and sometimes in Romania "arena" comes 2nd like in English and not 1st. Source from the Romanian Basketball Federation, this venue being for basketball. [16] and another one from their local press [17]. Thanks! Rostadia2012 (talk) 11:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Rostadia2012: Done. The article is now located at Sepsi Arena. North America1000 15:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sure. I personally created this article, and sometimes in Romania "arena" comes 2nd like in English and not 1st. Source from the Romanian Basketball Federation, this venue being for basketball. [16] and another one from their local press [17]. Thanks! Rostadia2012 (talk) 11:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- The Wikipedia apps briefly showed pages without CSS last week. This meant they looked wrong. It was quickly fixed but cached pages without CSS were shown for a few hours. [18][19]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 15 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 16 September. It will be on all wikis from 17 September (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Move to Climate change
Hello. I think we're both patching up the portal simultaneously. I think I've completed the main page but /Intro and /News need attention. Shall I leave those to you? Certes (talk) 11:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Certes: So far I have only changed the intro header to read as the correct title. I am working on entirely other matters right now, and don't really want to get involved in page moves and cleanup/organization with all of this at this time. So, please feel free to continue as you have been doing. Also thanks for the notification on the portal's talk page. North America1000 11:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Mainly done, though there will be a few loose ends to tidy once we're sure of the page's long term title (and the fate of Category:Global warming, Category:Global warming portal, etc.). When you have time, please can you check the page overwritten by this move? If it was a redirect with no history then no further action is needed, but if it was or had been an actual portal then it may have content worth merging. I'm guessing that it was just a redirect, as there is no MfD page for it. Thanks, Certes (talk) 12:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Certes: Here's a synopsis. There are no deleted pages existent for the portal, which would be viewable with sysop access if existent. The portal originally redirected to the Energy portal (link). No history merge appears to have ever occurred, which would indicate a potential for a page move from "Climate change" to "Global warming" if it were existent, and it appears that the portal was begun with the name "Global Warming" (example diff). This is further confirmed by a page more that occurred in April 2011 to change the upper-case "W" in the word "warming" to lower case (diff). North America1000 10:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. It looks as if we're just about done then. We should probably show a tree for Category:Climate change rather than Category:Global warming but doing that naively messes up the format, so I'll leave it for the editors behind the name change. Certes (talk) 11:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Certes: Here's a synopsis. There are no deleted pages existent for the portal, which would be viewable with sysop access if existent. The portal originally redirected to the Energy portal (link). No history merge appears to have ever occurred, which would indicate a potential for a page move from "Climate change" to "Global warming" if it were existent, and it appears that the portal was begun with the name "Global Warming" (example diff). This is further confirmed by a page more that occurred in April 2011 to change the upper-case "W" in the word "warming" to lower case (diff). North America1000 10:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2020. Current and upcoming events
September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Election reminder: our end-of-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 December. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. Drive and Blitz reports
June Blitz: An uncorrected typo (even copy editors make copy editing mistakes!) led to an eight-day "leap blitz" from 14 to 21 June, focusing on requests and articles tagged in May. 19 participating editors claimed 54 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: Over 750,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event, keeping pace with the previous three self-isolated drives. Of the 38 people who signed up, 30 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 16 to 22 August, we copy edited articles tagged in June and July 2020 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 37 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news
June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Baffle gab1978, Tdslk, Twofingered Typist, and first-time coordinator Puddleglum2.0. Reidgreg took a break after serving for a couple years. Thanks to everyone who participated! Progress report: As of 01:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 532 requests since 1 January and there were 38 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Puddleglum2.0, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Usertalkpage blue border
Template:Usertalkpage blue border has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Userpage blue border short
Template:Userpage blue border short has been nominated for merging with Template:User page. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Userpage blue border short rounded
Template:Userpage blue border short rounded has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2020)
The history of Asian art includes a vast range of influences from various cultures and religions. Pictured is Buddhist Temple in the Mountains, 11th century, China, ink on silk, by Li Cheng.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Grease (song) • Skurfing (sport) Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There is a new tag for reverted edits. For example you can see it in the recent changes feed or in the article history. It is added to edits when they have been undone, rollbacked or manually reverted to an older version of the page. [20][21]
Changes later this week
- The number of times you can do something in a period of time on wiki is limited. This could be the number of edits per minute or the number of users you email in a day. Some users are not affected by all limits because of their user rights. They could soon see the limit even if it does not affect them. [22]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 22 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 23 September. It will be on all wikis from 24 September (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
21:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2020)
Hello, Northamerica1000.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Pig Latin • Asian art Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Admins can now see links to diffs of deleted revisions on Special:AbuseLog. This uses the interface of Special:Undelete. [23]
- Editors are automatically added to some user groups. For example editors are added to autoconfirmed users when they have edited enough times and long enough. Abuse filters can hinder users from automatically getting user rights for a period of time. They can also remove rights user have. Wikis can now ask to change how long this period of time is for their wiki in Phabricator. It is currently five days. [24]
Problems
- Last year some abuse filters stopped working because of a new change. If they tried to use variables that were unavailable for that action they would fail. This has now been fixed. [25]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 29 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 30 September. It will be on all wikis from 1 October (calendar).
Future changes
- You can't see the language links to other language versions from the talk page or history page. They are also not shown when you edit an article. This could change. It is not decided if for example the history page should link to another history page or to the article. You can take part in the discussion in Phabricator.
- The link colours could change. This is to make the difference between links and other text more clear. You can read more in Phabricator.
- In your preferences you can choose to get different notifications on the web or by email. You will see
Apps
as one of the alternatives later this week. This is because the Android and iOS Wikipedia apps will use push notifications for those who want them. You can see the preferences on the test wiki. The goal is to have push notifications on Android in October and on iOS in early 2021. [26] - You can soon put pages on your watchlist for a limited time. This could be useful if you want to watch something for a shorter time but don't want it on your watchlist forever. It now works on mediawiki.org and will come to more wikis later. You can read more and see when it will come to other wikis.
- You can see what Wikimedians think are the best new technical tools this year. You can also nominate them.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse ping list
Hello NA1K, I don't expect you remember me, but we kinda, sorta, interacted a bit regarding Portal:Nepal back when I didn't know much about what Wikipedia really was, and it was one of the more pleasant interactions with a super-experienced editor I had as a newbie. So, you're always on my mind. Anyway, currently, I am compiling a list of editors by area-specific expertise, intended to be used by Teahouse regulars to make sure no query gets archived unanswered, by pinging editors in the list to hopefully help answer those questions. The draft list is currently at User:Usedtobecool/Tea. I was wondering if you'd be interested in being listed. I have you for portals only, currently, but if you'd be interested, you are free to add yourself to any of the categories in the list. The reason I ask, of course, is if you would rather not be listed, I have to know so I can remove you before the page is moved to project space and recommended for use. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 20:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Usedtobecool: I decline at this time, and have removed my name from the list you created (diff). My time on-wiki is more limited than it used to be, and what time I do have I plan on spending on other areas. While I appreciate the offer, I do not feel like taking on more new tasks at this time. North America1000 10:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000, it's a shame, but please, no worries at all. Assuming the initiative goes on, hopefully, you'll be able to help out sometime in the future. Would you be able to suggest a few other users who edit regularly and also happen to have experience and knowledge about portals, so I can reach out to them? I have never even looked at anything in that area outside of Portal:Nepal, and I have a fuzzy recollection that Teahouse did have a few occasions to miss experts in that area in the past. I reckon I could post at WT:PORTAL, but I have had mixed results with those kinds of posts and I would prefer if there were a few highly active editors you could recommend, to try my luck with first. Best! Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Usedtobecool: Some users who come to mind include Certes, Moxy, SportingFlyer and Euryalus. Of course, you would have to ask them directly if they have any interest in participating in this project you are initiating. North America1000 04:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you! Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping. Unfortunatey I can't claim to be an expert on portals - it's been ages since I've regularly edited one and I've forgotten the markup. If you need additional volunteers for things on that list I'd be a better fit for Arbcom procedures. But happy to help out with whatever.-- Euryalus (talk) 05:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Euryalus, I have added you for ArbCom. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- I've not done much portal editing: 650 edits (plus many more to deleted portals – don't get me started on that), and mostly minor stuff such as disambiguating links. I did write a module which inserts excerpts from articles into portals, but even that has now been taken over by the official template editors. I'd be willing to help but I'm probably not the best person to ask. WP:WikiProject Portals#Project participants or the more concise WP:WikiProject Directory/Description/WikiProject Portals might suggest other possibilities. Certes (talk) 11:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Certes, I am adding you to the list (at least until we can find better persons to ask; I find that reasonable ). Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Usedtobecool: Some users who come to mind include Certes, Moxy, SportingFlyer and Euryalus. Of course, you would have to ask them directly if they have any interest in participating in this project you are initiating. North America1000 04:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Would this be a good wikiproject?
Hey Northamerica1000, I'm a bit starved for feedback and you have quite a lot of experience with wikiprojects, so I figured I'd ask you. Do you think this could be successful?
Basically, it's a page that I would be active on if it existed. What I have trouble estimating is how many others would use it, whether it would die out... and assuming that there are other people who would be interested, I cannot imagine how I would find such people or attract attention to it. Kind regards from PJvanMill)talk( 20:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi PJvanMill: Comes across as functional. An immediate idea would be to expand the scope to cover all backlogs, including those that WikiProjects supposedly handle. Many WikiProjects have very little, and in some cases, almost no recent participation. Hence, expanding the scope of your potential project would likely be in order, and would also make it more attractive to editors interested in specific topical areas. Fwiw, there's Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Backlog Countermeasure from 2010, which was never created for whatever reasons. I noticed you posted at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals, which is fine, but subpages of that page typically receive very little input, from what I've seen in cursory searches. I think that whole process should be tagged as inactive, which would allow users to boldly create projects in a more timely fashion and immediately recruit members. Regarding recruitment, I recommend using an invitation template. For example, see {{FD invitation}}. North America1000 15:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the detailed response. I was beginning to feel a bit discouraged by the lack of support for the proposal, even though that is only to be expected with it getting on average less than 1 pageview a day.
- To your point about the scope: only backlogs actively being handled would be excluded, where "active" would be a relatively high bar. Part of my intent is that people who enjoy similar work will eventually go and form or revive a more specific project. But your suggestion is also an option worth considering.
- Now, the one big problem I have is that if I made an invitation template, I would have no idea who to use it on! I cannot think of a single user who I have reason to believe would be interested. I mean, do I just arbitrarily select people that I know? But I know so few people!
- If I just have, say, two other people who want to participate, I think I will move it into WP space and will be able to keep it alive. WP:WikiProject Council/Guide says I should get five, but it seems that that it was marked as a guideline without any discussion, and the addition of the 6 people minimum also ...? (I will shortly propose the "guideline" tag be removed) I figure that ultimately, it is MfD that decides whether a project is allowed to exist. Kind regards from PJvanMill)talk( 18:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2020)
Hello, Northamerica1000.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Asian art • Grease (song) Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There is a new tool where you can see which home wiki users have in discussions on Meta. This can help show which communities are not part of the discussion on wikis where we make decisions that affect many other wikis.
- You can now thank users for file uploads or for changing the language of a page. [27]
Problems
- There were many errors with the new MediaWiki version last week. The new version was rolled back. Updates that should have happened last week are late. [28]
- Everyone was logged out. This was because a user reported being logged in to someone else's account. The problem should be fixed now. [29]
- Many pages have JavaScript errors. You can read more and now see a list of user scripts with errors.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 6 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 7 October. It will be on all wikis from 8 October (calendar).
- Letters immediately after a link are shown as part of the link. For example the entire word in
[[Child]]ren
is linked. On Arabic wikis this works at both the start and end of a word. Previously on Arabic wikis numbers and other non-letter Unicode characters were shown as part of the link at the start of a word but not at the end. Now only Latin and Arabic letters will extend links on Arabic wikis. [30]
Future changes
- You will be able to read but not to edit the wikis for up to an hour on 27 October around 14:00 (UTC). It will probably be shorter than an hour. [31]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2020)
Hello, Northamerica1000.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: August 2016 Aden bombing • Pig Latin Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|