Jump to content

User talk:Northamerica1000/Archive 104

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 100Archive 102Archive 103Archive 104Archive 105Archive 106Archive 110

indonesian project

the right hand does not know whats the other one is doing with things as simple as categories or general maintenance - dont let me start ... as for afd's I could waste a vast amount of time explaining off wiki the many issues - as for geography - thenext 79,850 stubs are due at any time now the way things look:| JarrahTree 12:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

my ranting and raving about the issue of whether 80,000 + indonesian villages are inherently notable - and the right for new eds to randomly collect and play with un-notable locations - the project lacks coherence as to its various category trees and things.. JarrahTree 13:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
@JarrahTree: I took a look at the WP Indonesia talk page. I don't think I want to get involved in any of this at this time. North America1000 15:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

re: Portal:Scotland

Hi NA1K, thanks for your message about the portal. Sorry for not responding sooner, but I've not been very active recently. There's been a Covid-19 crisis involving a close relative which was causing me a great deal of concern for a while. Thankfully it's pretty much resolved and all OK now. I see that some hasty work by Andrybak seems to have fixed it, so thanks to them for that, but having a look back in the history at earlier versions I can see the issue that you described. It's strange because it seems to be replicating an issue that was widespread a few months back, caused by some modifications that were made to the relevant modules code I seem to recall, but these were fixed after a Phabricator ticket was raised. I'm not sure if this is the same issue or not, I'll mention it to Certes who was involved with the original issue. Thanks for bringing this to community attention and enabling a rapid fix. --Cactus.man 19:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

@Cactus.man: Sorry to hear about your crisis. Despite the headlines, most people recover quickly and I hope your relative is no exception.
Thanks for the ping. I don't know what caused the problem. Other editors solved it while I was investigating, so I dropped the case. Certes (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
@Cactus.man: Glad to hear that all is stable after your relative's illness. Well, the Scotland portal is still rendering correctly as of this post. Also thanks to Certes for stopping by. You both can feel free to keep in touch anytime. North America1000 16:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).

Administrator changes

added Red Phoenix
readded EuryalusSQL
removed JujutacularMonty845RettetastMadchester

Oversight changes

readded GB fan
removed KeeganOpabinia regalisPremeditated Chaos

Guideline and policy news


This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2020)

The potato (Solanum tuberosum) is an example of a New World crop, a crop native to the New World (mostly the Americas) before 1492 CE and not found anywhere else at that time.
Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

New World crops

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Double standard • Teenage rebellion


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, MDanielsBot (talk) 04:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

Nomination of ITyphoon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITyphoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITyphoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CatcherStorm talk 13:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

16:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2020)

Abraham Ortelius's world map, from the Typus Orbis Terrarum ("Theatre of the Orb of the World") atlas, first published in 1564
Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

World map

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: New World crops • Double standard


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

20:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

IABotManagementConsole [1.2]

Northamerica1000, I've used the IABotManagement Console a few times, which links internally here and externally where I've used it via toolforge here, (which includes an option to "Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)") and up until a few days ago, only on pages where I am very familiar with the References (mostly articles I've created or contributed substantially).

While cleaning the article Mercy (Duffy song) (diff) posted on Wikipedia:Cleanup, the bot edit summary was: (Rescuing 68 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.1).

I circled back to have a closer look at what the bot had done, (it has no option to verify before submitting), and to my surprise saw that it actually adds to References, archived pages with "not found errors" aka dead links, that have been previously captured at the Wayback Machine! Unfortunately, I wasn't able to rollback my edit and spent almost 2 hours verifying each reference all to manually revert 2 of them.

As much as I like that tool, and knowing that you need to use it responsibly, I doubt that most will realize that the bot is adding dead archived links to References. I'm seeing more editors using the tool. Is there a reason to be concerned here? Thanks! — WILDSTARtalk 20:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

  • Hi @WildStar: I recommend contacting Cyberpower678, the publisher of the script. There is also a link atop this page to submit a bug report. Regarding the references with links to archived pages then being marked as a dead link, it sounds like the script is trying to correct something that was already corrected, making the reference incorrect in the process. North America1000 14:19, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

I split white pizza, I am surprise this didn't have an article until now. The article could use some expansion. Valoem talk contrib 22:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Archive subpages

Hello. Years ago, you created some redirects such as Occupy Oakland/Archive 1. We're considering deleting a similar page. Several other respected editors also created /Archive pages, so I suspect that they have a purpose we've overlooked. Can you think why we might need them? Certes (talk) 21:03, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

@Certes: The redirect was placed in the event that someone selects the "Article" link, so that they're immediately directed to the actual article after accessing the archive pages. Looks neater than a red link too, imo. North America1000 01:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! Do you want to add that point to the RfD, or shall I? It sounds as if deletion may be harmful. Certes (talk) 11:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
@Certes: I'll leave it to you, as I don't really feel like getting involved in this matter. Essentially, it makes no sense to have red links on the "Article" links in the upper-left hand corner of archive pages. Why would we want red links there? How would that improve navigation? Sometimes it seems that folks are so intent on deletion, that sometimes deletion may be occurring for the sake of deletion itself. Even if such redirects have not been used yet, they may be in the future. North America1000 01:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
I agree with those points and will write something on the RfD. The redirect I proposed for deletion doesn't have a corresponding talk page; the ones which do should probably stay. Certes (talk) 10:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2020)

An act is a division or unit of a theatre work, including a play, film, opera, and musical theatre. Pictured is a visual representation of the three-act structure.
Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Act (drama)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: World map • New World crops


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 17 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

17:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2020)

Delivery is the process of transporting goods from a source location to a predefined destination. Pictured is a man delivering charcoal by bicycle in Uganda.
Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Delivery (commerce)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Act (drama) • World map


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

20:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2020)

Skurfing as a sport has two common forms: "water skurfing" and "street skurfing". Pictured is an example of water skurfing, water skiing on a surfboard.
Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Skurfing (sport)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Delivery (commerce) • Act (drama)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

15:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2020)

Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Grease (song)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Skurfing (sport) • Delivery (commerce)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Help me please with move

Hi! Help me please, brother, with moving Arena Sepsi to Sepsi Arena - that's the official name. Thanks! Rostadia2012 (talk) 18:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).

Administrator changes

added Eddie891
removed AngelaJcw69Just ChillingPhilg88Viajero

CheckUser changes

readded SQL

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
  • A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors must or should use the articles for creation process.
  • A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.

Arbitration


16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Move to Climate change

Hello. I think we're both patching up the portal simultaneously. I think I've completed the main page but /Intro and /News need attention. Shall I leave those to you? Certes (talk) 11:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

  • @Certes: So far I have only changed the intro header to read as the correct title. I am working on entirely other matters right now, and don't really want to get involved in page moves and cleanup/organization with all of this at this time. So, please feel free to continue as you have been doing. Also thanks for the notification on the portal's talk page. North America1000 11:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Mainly done, though there will be a few loose ends to tidy once we're sure of the page's long term title (and the fate of Category:Global warming, Category:Global warming portal, etc.). When you have time, please can you check the page overwritten by this move? If it was a redirect with no history then no further action is needed, but if it was or had been an actual portal then it may have content worth merging. I'm guessing that it was just a redirect, as there is no MfD page for it. Thanks, Certes (talk) 12:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
@Certes: Here's a synopsis. There are no deleted pages existent for the portal, which would be viewable with sysop access if existent. The portal originally redirected to the Energy portal (link). No history merge appears to have ever occurred, which would indicate a potential for a page move from "Climate change" to "Global warming" if it were existent, and it appears that the portal was begun with the name "Global Warming" (example diff). This is further confirmed by a page more that occurred in April 2011 to change the upper-case "W" in the word "warming" to lower case (diff). North America1000 10:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. It looks as if we're just about done then. We should probably show a tree for Category:Climate change rather than Category:Global warming but doing that naively messes up the format, so I'll leave it for the editors behind the name change. Certes (talk) 11:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2020.

                 Current and upcoming events

September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!

Election reminder: our end-of-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 December. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

Drive and Blitz reports

June Blitz: An uncorrected typo (even copy editors make copy editing mistakes!) led to an eight-day "leap blitz" from 14 to 21 June, focusing on requests and articles tagged in May. 19 participating editors claimed 54 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

July Drive: Over 750,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event, keeping pace with the previous three self-isolated drives. Of the 38 people who signed up, 30 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here.

August Blitz: From 16 to 22 August, we copy edited articles tagged in June and July 2020 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 37 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Other news

June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Baffle gab1978, Tdslk, Twofingered Typist, and first-time coordinator Puddleglum2.0. Reidgreg took a break after serving for a couple years. Thanks to everyone who participated!

Progress report: As of 01:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 532 requests since 1 January and there were 38 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above).

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Puddleglum2.0, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Usertalkpage blue border

Template:Usertalkpage blue border has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Userpage blue border short

Template:Userpage blue border short has been nominated for merging with Template:User page. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Userpage blue border short rounded

Template:Userpage blue border short rounded has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2020)

The history of Asian art includes a vast range of influences from various cultures and religions. Pictured is Buddhist Temple in the Mountains, 11th century, China, ink on silk, by Li Cheng.
Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Asian art

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Grease (song) • Skurfing (sport)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

21:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2020)

Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

August 2016 Aden bombing

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Pig Latin • Asian art


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse ping list

Hello NA1K, I don't expect you remember me, but we kinda, sorta, interacted a bit regarding Portal:Nepal back when I didn't know much about what Wikipedia really was, and it was one of the more pleasant interactions with a super-experienced editor I had as a newbie. So, you're always on my mind. Anyway, currently, I am compiling a list of editors by area-specific expertise, intended to be used by Teahouse regulars to make sure no query gets archived unanswered, by pinging editors in the list to hopefully help answer those questions. The draft list is currently at User:Usedtobecool/Tea. I was wondering if you'd be interested in being listed. I have you for portals only, currently, but if you'd be interested, you are free to add yourself to any of the categories in the list. The reason I ask, of course, is if you would rather not be listed, I have to know so I can remove you before the page is moved to project space and recommended for use. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 20:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

  • @Usedtobecool: I decline at this time, and have removed my name from the list you created (diff). My time on-wiki is more limited than it used to be, and what time I do have I plan on spending on other areas. While I appreciate the offer, I do not feel like taking on more new tasks at this time. North America1000 10:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
    Northamerica1000, it's a shame, but please, no worries at all. Assuming the initiative goes on, hopefully, you'll be able to help out sometime in the future. Would you be able to suggest a few other users who edit regularly and also happen to have experience and knowledge about portals, so I can reach out to them? I have never even looked at anything in that area outside of Portal:Nepal, and I have a fuzzy recollection that Teahouse did have a few occasions to miss experts in that area in the past. I reckon I could post at WT:PORTAL, but I have had mixed results with those kinds of posts and I would prefer if there were a few highly active editors you could recommend, to try my luck with first. Best! Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the ping. Unfortunatey I can't claim to be an expert on portals - it's been ages since I've regularly edited one and I've forgotten the markup. If you need additional volunteers for things on that list I'd be a better fit for Arbcom procedures. But happy to help out with whatever.-- Euryalus (talk) 05:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Euryalus, I have added you for ArbCom. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
I've not done much portal editing: 650 edits (plus many more to deleted portals – don't get me started on that), and mostly minor stuff such as disambiguating links. I did write a module which inserts excerpts from articles into portals, but even that has now been taken over by the official template editors. I'd be willing to help but I'm probably not the best person to ask. WP:WikiProject Portals#Project participants or the more concise WP:WikiProject Directory/Description/WikiProject Portals might suggest other possibilities. Certes (talk) 11:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Certes, I am adding you to the list (at least until we can find better persons to ask; I find that reasonable ). Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Would this be a good wikiproject?

Hey Northamerica1000, I'm a bit starved for feedback and you have quite a lot of experience with wikiprojects, so I figured I'd ask you. Do you think this could be successful?

Basically, it's a page that I would be active on if it existed. What I have trouble estimating is how many others would use it, whether it would die out... and assuming that there are other people who would be interested, I cannot imagine how I would find such people or attract attention to it. Kind regards from PJvanMill)talk( 20:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Hi PJvanMill: Comes across as functional. An immediate idea would be to expand the scope to cover all backlogs, including those that WikiProjects supposedly handle. Many WikiProjects have very little, and in some cases, almost no recent participation. Hence, expanding the scope of your potential project would likely be in order, and would also make it more attractive to editors interested in specific topical areas. Fwiw, there's Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Backlog Countermeasure from 2010, which was never created for whatever reasons. I noticed you posted at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals, which is fine, but subpages of that page typically receive very little input, from what I've seen in cursory searches. I think that whole process should be tagged as inactive, which would allow users to boldly create projects in a more timely fashion and immediately recruit members. Regarding recruitment, I recommend using an invitation template. For example, see {{FD invitation}}. North America1000 15:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the detailed response. I was beginning to feel a bit discouraged by the lack of support for the proposal, even though that is only to be expected with it getting on average less than 1 pageview a day.
To your point about the scope: only backlogs actively being handled would be excluded, where "active" would be a relatively high bar. Part of my intent is that people who enjoy similar work will eventually go and form or revive a more specific project. But your suggestion is also an option worth considering.
Now, the one big problem I have is that if I made an invitation template, I would have no idea who to use it on! I cannot think of a single user who I have reason to believe would be interested. I mean, do I just arbitrarily select people that I know? But I know so few people!
If I just have, say, two other people who want to participate, I think I will move it into WP space and will be able to keep it alive. WP:WikiProject Council/Guide says I should get five, but it seems that that it was marked as a guideline without any discussion, and the addition of the 6 people minimum also ...? (I will shortly propose the "guideline" tag be removed) I figure that ultimately, it is MfD that decides whether a project is allowed to exist. Kind regards from PJvanMill)talk( 18:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2020)

Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Pig Latin

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Asian art • Grease (song)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

16:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2020)

Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Trout Mask Replica

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: August 2016 Aden bombing • Pig Latin


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions