User talk:Nordisk varg

Welcome!

Hi Nordisk varg, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Good luck, and have fun. --Paragon12321 (talk) 04:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Gimnasia's Article

Nordisk varg: hola. Estuve viendo un poco y esta bueno. Yo intento hacer lo que puedo, hace mucho que no estudio ingles por lo cual estoy medio oxidado (y tampoco tenia un nivel excelente). Pero bueno, incluí la sección del clásico platense. También le cambie el formato en la parte de la histoai y lo divide en las secciones de Profesionalismo y Amateur.

Los cambios que fuiste haciendo parecen estar bien. Lo único que te diría es que si cambias parte de lo que estaba en la historia del articulo principal, si podes cambiarlo también en el articulo de historia del club. Aunque en el de historia del club tendría que estar un poco mas extenso. Saludos --Tincho gelp (talk) 19:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nordisk varg: Hola. Estuve editando un poco el artículo de Gimnasia en Francés. Si podes entrar y corregir los errores, te lo agradecería. Debe haber varios errores porque use un traductor online. Ya un usuario dio su opinión en la discusión diciendo que había que mejorarlo puesto que se notaba que no era francés el que lo había escrito (por la sintaxis y la ortografía. Aca te dejo el link Gimnasia LP en Francés Desde ya muchas gracias. Saludos --Tincho gelp (talk) 16:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juan José Muñoz's Article

Novardisk varg: Hola, como va? Bueno, era para avisarte que en español hice el articulo de Muñoz y te avisaba por si querias traducirlo, ya que la versión en inglés no tiene mucha información. En otro orden de cosas, el artículo de Gimnasia y Esgrima La Plata en español esta nominado a articulo bueno. Pasate si queres. Saludos --Tincho gelp (talk) 18:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Novardisk varg: Mil gracias, el articulo te quedo perfecto. Seguiré en wikipedia en español, y si puedo llegar a colaborar en algo en inglés lo haré también. Por cierto, el artículo de Gimnasia en español ya es articulo destacado. Saludos --Tincho gelp (talk) 01:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto pronunciation

I've never heard locals pronounce "Toronto" in a way that would make it sound like they're referring to this city. However, I have heard that pronunciation before. But we can't possibly fit every single pronunciation in the main article. That's what the "Name of Toronto" article is for. The fact that, as you say, only some locals pronounce it that way would indicate a minority view, and that's not appropriate for the intro of the article. Every local that I've run into (and I've lived in the GTA my whole life) pronounces it "təˈrɒnoʊ" (tuh-RON-oe). As for linking to the Name of Toronto article, it already is linked from the infobox under "Nickname". Thank you for contacting me to discuss changes instead of edit-warring like some other new users. Welcome to Wikipedia and happy editing! --Pwnage8 (talk) 18:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend that you post on the talk page about this to see what other editors think. --Pwnage8 (talk) 21:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up that I posted on the Toronto talk page that you should add your pronunciation. It appears I was wrong. --Pwnage8 (talk) 17:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copa Centenario

As the tournament has it's own article (Copa Centenario de la AFA) and is mentioned in the 1993-94 in Argentine football article, I don't really see the need to include it in the Argentine Primera overview page, being a seperate tournament after all. I definately agree that there are a lot of missing tournaments such as es:Copa Dr. Carlos Ibarguren, es:Copa Nicasio Vila and many others. Other missing items include es:Copa Lipton and es:Copa Newton and many of the Copa América editions are nothing more that stubs. I have created a lot of Seasons in Argentine football, but there are still more than 60 missing. On top of all that the transfer window is due so another 100+ players to move around and five times as many rumours to revert. It's too much E P 22:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Theres no need to get stroppy about it, all I object to is the claim the Gimnasia LP have won a professional league title when even the most rabid fan would accept that Copa Centenario was a one off cup tournament, not a league title. If you think stuff like Copa Jockey Club, Copa Ibaarguren, Copa Newton and Copa América are unimportant to the history of Argentine football that's fine, just don't add misinformation to the Argentine Primera article. Go ahead and mention the irregular seasons and cups in a separate section if you must, but claiming that Gimnasia LP have won any professional league titles is just plain wrong. E P 14:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look I have more important things to do than argue with you, so this will be my last comment on the issue. The Primera División Argentina article is undisputably about the league championship. If the section header in the article was misleading, this is a reason to change the section header (as someone else has already done) not to add misleading information to match the inappropriate heading. Anyone who knows a little about Argentine football knows that GELP have not won a league title since 1929. The way you left the top three finishes section here implied that Gimnasia came first in the league during the professional era. This is misleading to anyone who doesn't know the facts, and inaccurate to anyone who does. Feel free to have the last word if you want. E P 13:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone though you guys' discussion, and would like to give a suggestion. English peasant is correct that it is misleading to include the Copa Centenario de la AFA into the table. However, as it is an offically recognized championship, it is better reflected in the article. So I suggest we add a new section in the article or a note under the table to address this problem. Thus it is clear it is an offical championship though on the other hand it is not counted as a league title. Any comment? Salt (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added that section, so maybe you can go and give some comments. I am also going to created articles for those three official but non-regular cups, but I did not find any information on Copa Suecia. Do you have any information about this tournament? Salt (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gimnasia y Esgrima

Si, me parece apropiada la modificación. En cuanto a lo de la nota en realidad era mi intención de a poco ir sacando info de esa sección ya que me parece muy extensa por lo poco relevante. Pero si decís que debe ir no me opongo. un abrazo. --Elnegrojose (talk) 17:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nordisk: agenda mi mail asi la seguimos en otro lado. mi nombre de usuario+08 este servidor pero el nuestro Espero que se haya entendido. Un abrazo. --Elnegrojose (talk) 03:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

invitación

Cómo te va Nordisk: podrías acercarte a la págia de discusión de Caracas Metro pero la versión en español y brindar tu parecer? Muchas gracias —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elnegrojose (talk • contribs) 01:21, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Hay recomendaciones para hacer de el artículo de Gimnasia en inglés, un artículo bueno. Espero que pases por el artículo para ver si me ayudas a mejorarlo. Saludos --Tincho gelp (talk) 20:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copa Suecia

Thanks for your help and I've created the article on Copa Suecia. I would be very grateful if you can help me to check whether the translation is correct as I can't speak Spanish. BTW, I have a question on the article. The webpage says there is no "chicos" teams winning a official title before the cup. What does it mean by "chicos teams"? Atlanta is also from Buenos Aires, so why it is a "chicos teams"?

Here is the concerned part:
Desde la fundación de la AFA, en noviembre de 1934, no había ningún antecedente de torneos (tanto Campeonatos como Copas) ganados por equipos "chicos": Boca, River, Independiente, Racing y San Lorenzo se repartían los Campeonatos y Huracán apenas alguna Copa oficial (Escobar, Británica). Tan sólo se puede mencionar el Campeonato de la República, que con la participación de equipos del interior y por el sistema de eliminación, había organizado la AFA y cuyos ganadores habían sido San Martín (Tucumán), en 1944, y Estudiantes (La Plata), en 1945.

Thank you very much! Salt (talk) 07:56, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sobremonte and the British Invasions

Good point. However, I never mentioned the King <27 September edit>. Best regards.--Darius (talk) 23:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dialectal or "dialectical"?

Thank you for correcting my "dialectical" mistake in the River Plate or rioplatense Spanish article.

This clearly shows that in Wikipedia one not only learns from the articles themselves, but from other users' comments as well!

Greetings :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxBech1975 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Homonymous

Hi

It's not really used in English too often so I wasn't sure if there was a word used in S America with a slightly diff meaning, we tend to use the phrase "by/of the same name" so it will be good for people to learn.

Anyway, as it's only really mentioned in Wiki in medicine, I've updated the disambiguation page to reflect your usage so I can put links in the sentences.

cheers--Chaosdruid (talk) 06:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gimnasia =

Nordisk varg: Hi, i nominated the article of Club de Gimnasia y Esgrima La Plata again to a Good Article. Solo queria avisarte. Pasate por el articulo y fijate si hay algo para corregir. Saludos --Tincho gelp (talk) 23:30, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Ya revisaron el articulo, fijate si podes ayudar con los arreglos que nos piden. Yo ya arregle un par, fijate en el historial. Saludos --Tincho GELP (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nordisk varg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nordisk varg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nordisk varg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]