User talk:Norac Eeb

Your submission at Articles for creation: ThreatConnect (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ThreatConnect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 02:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Norac Eeb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 02:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Threat Intelligence Platform (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Threat Intelligence Platform and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 02:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Threat Intelligence Analyst (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Threat Intelligence Analyst and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:ThreatConnect because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 15:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about reverting your edit. I shouldn't have done that. Feel free to ignore the above warning. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 15:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

I'm confused, how does this page not express any COI and get published? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splunk

Norac Eeb (talk) 16:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

published Threat Intelligence Platform

I published Threat Intelligence Platform after removing quite a bit of cruft because I'm interested in the subject. The article was written more like a cost benefit analysis than an encyclopedia entry. You should put it on your Watchlist (click the star at the top of the article) and inspect all new edits. You should probably read WP:WEASEL to avoid using descriptors and pov leaning adjectives in your writing. The Wikipedia is really, really dry writing, think of writing the software manual rather than the sales proposal.

The article still may be a little fluffy, but let's see if other editors improve it. Regards 009o9 (talk) 08:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:ThreatConnect has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ThreatConnect. Thanks! 009o9 (talk) 19:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Threat Intelligence Analyst

Hello, Norac Eeb. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Threat Intelligence Analyst".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 03:07, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]