User talk:Nopirosyadi

Welcome!

Hello, Nopirosyadi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Quebec telemarketing, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Biblioworm 00:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Quebec telemarketing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Quebec telemarketing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Biblioworm 00:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Quebec telemarketing) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Quebec telemarketing, Nopirosyadi!

Wikipedia editor Bfpage just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Greetings and congratulations on your article. I will spend some time helping to reformat the information. In the meantime, you need to remove as much promotional/advertisement-like language as you can or it will be nominated for deletion.

To reply, leave a comment on Bfpage's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Quebec telemarketing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Quebec telemarketing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Quebec telemarketing

I just saved your article from being deleted. Don't go back in and insert things that might call it to the attention of other editors who like to delete new articles written by new editors-some people like to do this all day long. The references should be cited in-line. They will then appear in the reference section if you format them correctly. I just didn't spend an hour of my time to have the article changed back into the condition that will get it deleted. Best Regards,

Bfpage |leave a message 11:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Adam Thibault 41 Defensive Back.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Adam Thibault 41 Defensive Back.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 01:37, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Adam Thibault 41.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Adam Thibault 41.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 01:38, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Adam Thibault.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Adam Thibault.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Adam Thibault.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Adam Thibault.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 05:17, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Adam Thibault 41 Defensive Back.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Adam Thibault 41 Defensive Back.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 05:18, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Adam Thibault 41.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Adam Thibault 41.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 05:19, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article French telemarketing

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page French telemarketing to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:09, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of France telemarketing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on France telemarketing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of French telemarketing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on French telemarketing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of French telemarketing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article French telemarketing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/French telemarketing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:40, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quebec telemarketing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quebec telemarketing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quebec telemarketing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to French telemarketing, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nopirosyadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi, wiki staff. i would like to request unblock my account. i have read all guidelines and instruction and now i would like to fix and improve my content. i will obey all guidelines now on wiki and contribute more to write more article on wiki. lets you know that i am not paid writer, i am freelance who love write and improve my writing skill. please guide and assist me for writing on wiki. thanks.--Nopirosyadi (talk) 01:08, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on the checkuser results, I'm declining this request. PhilKnight (talk) 18:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If that's really the case, then:

why have you and these five other accounts been working so obsessively to create articles about a completely non-notable company, under a variety of guises, no less than twelve articles about this "Quebec Telemarketing" or alternate names?
where are the reliable sources? Can you point to a single legitimate news article about this company?
why is it so important to you that there be a Wikipedia article on this company, anyway? What attracted you to it?
what is your relationship to accounts Rinikusmiati‎, Fahmiyatna‎, Ayurahayu‎, Susi hasti‎ and Tete hastuti? There's clearly a connection: when Tete hastuti's unblock request was refused, it was on the grounds that "your primary account" make the request: and here you are, doing so.
finally, will you pledge that if unblocked, you will not recreate an article on Quebec Telemarketing in any form, by that name or any of its alternate names?

Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I may add to Shawn in Montreal's questions, the fact that I am concerned with the fact that, using numerous accounts, you have repeatedly created articles which have had various different titles, designed to give the impression that they are on different subjects, but which in fact all link to one business. I suggest that you should consider explaining that, if you want your unblock request to have any chance of success. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have just read a comment from another editor saying that you have used at least twelve ~~different titles for~~ different copies of your spam article. I had no idea it was that many. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. What the editor said was that you have created at least twelve versions/copies of the article, not that you used twelve different titles. However, my point applies equally to at least twelve creations under at least eight titles. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk)

Yes, that was a list compiled and maintained by User:MelanieN at the SPI page: there have been twelve attempts to create articles, though that includes multiple attempts with the same name. If one goes to Quebec Marketing's amateurish webpage, you'll see that have a long list of IDs they use -- so the permutations are basically endless. (I should add that as a bona fide Quebecer, I don't see how this can really be a Quebec company as neither an English company name nor a partly English corporate (for want of a better term) website are legal under our language laws, and I've seen IP editing from Asia during this case -- so I worry Wikipedia may be being used to abet something deceptive.) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just add that "i would like to fix and improve my content" sounds very much like the editor will resume promoting "Quebec Telemarketing". Let me be clear: this outfit has been found to be non-notable repeatedly -- there is currently no way to "improve" it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing admin and/or @JamesBWatson: There are some fresh CU results here that you will want to see. —DoRD (talk) 21:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, interesting. But as Bayu Antasari is also listed in the CU results, should Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bayu Antasari/Archive and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nopirosyadi/Archive be merged? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've raised it at the other SPI. So what we appear to have is paid editing for a non-notable Montreal roofer -- also repeatedly recreated -- as well as this telemarketing outfit, and I suspect what this outfit is attempting to offer clients are Wikipedia articles in addition to whatever business/mischief they can drum up by phone. I was always puzzled by the sockpuppeteer's first article, a legitimate article on a Montreal football player, Adam Thibault. It's been rewritten since, given this editor's utter incompetence in the English language, but I wonder if this was not a kind of audition piece, to show clients: look, we can create Wikipedia articles for you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nopirosyadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi, Shawan and JamesBWatson. Thanks for all information. let's you know that i do not have any relation or connection with other account. i am independent person. i want to contribute in wikipedia as volunteer writer, and for started, i wrote about those topics that i found on the search engine a lot of articles talk about it, every i found article, this corp always appear, so i decide to write about it, and then i learn about stub template and there is a lot of corp already written on wikipedia. please unblock my account and guide me to write more on wikipedia. thanks for all advice.--Nopirosyadi (talk) 00:27, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on the checkuser report, I'm declining this request. PhilKnight (talk) 18:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, based on this this CheckUser report, you appear to be a bald-faced, unrepentent liar. So my advice to you is don't let the door hit you on the way out. Goodbye. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:35, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since I blocked this account, I will not deal with the unblock requests, but will leave it to another administrator, so that you get an independent review. However, if you had been blocked by another administrator, I would have no hesitation in declining your requests. In view of the amounts of similarity in editing, even without the CheckUser results, the claim that you "do not have any relation or connection" any other accounts would be obviously false without any doubt. There are similarities in content of editing, in use of English, in tricks used in trying to avoid deletion of new copies of your spam article, and so on. Add to that the CheckUser results connecting this account to seven other accounts, and the claim becomes utterly absurd. The administrator reviewing these unblock requests may also like to look at the declined unblock request at User talk:Tete hastuti. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]