User talk:Noobie anonymous

Article Kannante Radha ,that is nominated for the deletion is unfair. Like you mentioned the article has a change in date of release, language and the broadcasting channel with respect to the original article (show). This is because that the show is a dubbed version of the show RadhaKrishn . The shows RadhaKrishn and Kannante Radha both have different audience in the country because of the variation in local language and dialects. So Nobody has the authenticity to delete the article without clear clarification. Reference 1.serial on Lord Krishna: Kannante Radha, new devotional serial - Times of India https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/malayalam/kannante-radha-new-devotional-serial/articleshow/66708702.cms 2.Noobie anonymous at IMDb 3.https://www.hotstar.com/tv/kannante-radha/s-1878 4.https://www.komparify.com/entertainment/tvshow/kannante-radha

September 2019

When an AfC submission is rejected multiple times, as has been the case with Draft:Run (2019 TV series), don't ignore the last rejection as you did when you moved the article to mainspace. Such a move is inappropriate, even if you think that you have fixed the problem. Instead, keep fixing the draft and submitting it for review until a reviewer approves it. That you hadn't actually brought the article to a stage where it was acceptable at the last submission should tell you that you are probably wrong in thinking that moving it to mainspace is OK. Please continue working on the article in draft space. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:51, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT COPY

DO NOT COPY is a basic concept in academia. The content you added here in the reception section at Kumkum – Ek Pyara Sa Bandhan was copied and closely paraphrased from this source. This is unacceptable. Copying is intellectually dishonest and lazy, and constitutes intellectual theft. Plagiarism and copyright violations will not be tolerated at Wikipedia, and you have already been warned about this. If you do it again, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also had to clean up your mess at Namah (TV series). Don't do this again. If you don't know how to express yourself in proper professional English, or can't differentiate between industry slang and cliches and tone appropriate for an encyclopedia, then find other ways to contribute. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:00, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will make sure that this will not happen again. Noobie anonymous (talk) 09:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'm confused why here you are presenting an opinion as a fact, i.e. "Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai was regarded as the best Hindi GEC weekday prime time fiction launch". Also the entirety of that sentence does not make sense, grammatically. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mariam Khan - Reporting Live, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Param Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blanket revert

Hi there, in these edits, you performed a blanket revert, which undid some necessary fixes. A better approach:

Open a previous version of the article, let's say this one, which was the version prior to Sagar.lakhani.1995's changes. You would click "Edit", then highlight and copy the plot section. Close this window without saving anything.
Go to the current page, click edit and paste that content over the existing plot section, noting in your edit summary that you were restoring a version prior to Sagar.lakhani.1995's edits.
Double-check by using Show changes or Show preview, then save.

This would result in just the plot section being restored, rather than the entire page. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting

Your constant reverting can cause problems for you. So stop reverting to older versions. The references are supposed to be in the casting section, not cast section. TabahiRoy (talk) 05:52, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful

Please be careful when making bold claims like here, where you claim that Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai was the second most-watched TV show of 2011, when what you mean is that it was the second most-watched Indian series. The world is a big place and these details matter. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Divya Drishti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nazar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies

Hi there, re: this edit where you added a Controversy section, a few things: Media outlets tend to report controversies, because people love to gossip and be outraged. We, however, as Wikipedia editors, have to be extraordinarily careful about the content we submit, especially when we might inadvertently be inserting potentially defamatory content. If we are not absolutely careful about how we write such controversial content, we could accidentally be suggesting that Bhattacharjee might have been an accomplice to a murder. We are first and foremost a neutral encyclopedia, and we must present a neutral perspective about things like this. If we don't have all of the facts or enough information to present a balanced perspective, then we should not add such content. You were correct to add her perspective, but then there is a bigger question of what encyclopedic purpose is being served by mentioning a controversy that isn't actually a controversy. Also, a lot of editors don't like "Controversy" sections, because they feel it places an undue emphasis on negative events, which makes it hard to maintain neutrality. Lastly, I would say that if English is not your strongest language, you should probably avoid tackling these tricky areas where language proficiency matters. I don't mean that to be disrespectful, but we have to absolutely be sure that we aren't being defamatory. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nazar (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dayan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Noobie anonymous

Thank you for creating Ayutha Ezhuthu (TV series).

User:WikiAviator, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Overall OK but more refs needed.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

WikiAviator (talk) 10:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nicknames

Re: this, In standard English structure, nicknames are typically placed in quotations between a person's first and last name. See Sarah 'Fergie' Ferguson and Gordon "Sting" Sumner, Paul "Bono" Hewson, Michael "Iron Mike" Tyson. "Aka" is sloppy shorthand that is typically only used by law enforcement, and wouldn't be suitable for encyclopedic prose. Yash "YK" Kapoor would be correct. Praniti "Pari" Rastogi would be correct. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of article Kannante Radha for deletion

Article Kannante Radha ,that is nominated for the deletion is unfair. Like you mentioned the article has a change in date of release, language and the broadcasting channel with respect to the original article (show). This is because that the show is a dubbed version of the show RadhaKrishn . The shows RadhaKrishn and Kannante Radha both have different audience in the country because of the variation in local language and dialects. So Nobody has the authenticity to delete the article without clear clarification. Reference 1.serial on Lord Krishna: Kannante Radha, new devotional serial - Times of India https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/malayalam/kannante-radha-new-devotional-serial/articleshow/66708702.cms 2.Noobie anonymous at IMDb 3.https://www.hotstar.com/tv/kannante-radha/s-1878 4.https://www.komparify.com/entertainment/tvshow/kannante-radha Neeraj V (talk) 02:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What does those do with audience? The story or cast none would change and is the same for any audience. It is just enough to mention the details like dubbed language, channel, its run date or any other under dubbed version section with proper citations in the article RadhaKrishn. Creating a separate article for dubbed one doesn't make sense. Noobie anonymous (talk) 08:05, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indenting talk page posts

When you leave a reply to a post on a talk page (both article talk and user talk), the usual convention is to indent your post one more level than to what you are replying, and you do this with colons - :. Help:Talk_pages#Indentation is a good resource. This just makes conversations easier to follow. Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would see to it hereafter. Thanks! Noobie anonymous (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devon Ke Dev...Mahadev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of maintenance templates

Hi there, re: this, please don't remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem or providing a clear justification for why it was removed. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply please!

Hello! You are supposed to take part in the discussion here. — GargAvinash ^talk 14:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seemed good editor in the first glance that's why I decided to discuss otherwise I would've reverted your edit. I feel that you are inexperienced to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cyphoidbomb is continuously trying to make you aware. Please follow their suggestions. I recommend you to please read Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Best Wishes. — GargAvinash ^talk 18:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do follow up to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and the suggestions improving my edits day by day. I am not that bad editor as you feel. Just because I make some small mistakes sometimes, please don't think that I am inexperienced and fail to follow those. I learn from every edits and suggestions from others to improve. Noobie anonymous (talk) 04:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please fix this?

Hi there, in this edit, you added these award tables to the Ishqbaaaz article. You appear to be using rowspans for the reference links, but some of those references are for winners lists, which means that the nominations are not properly supported by those references. For example here I had to remove the reference rowspan, because this reference doesn't say anything about Chandna being nominated for "Best Actress in a Lead Role". Can you please fix the others so that I don't have to? Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I did not notice that before as I just merged list of awards into the article. I will see to it. With regards. Noobie anonymous (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by Star Jalsha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Titli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Titli (TV series)

A tag has been placed on Titli (TV series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:TOOSOON no source of notability till now

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 05:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Titli (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Titli (TV series), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 07:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suntv wikipage

Dont do unwanted editing in suntv wiki page.. It's a stupid decision to list serials in alphabetical order.. It's makes no sense.

Serials should be listed according to the time slot only.. Also serials episodes should be updated in the main  wiki page..

Don't do unwanted editing. Revert to the previous version B103N48 (talk) 20:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to MOS:TV, list articles should follow certain order of arrangements like alphabetical order or date of premiere. It seems that you have no knowledge about Wikipedia's standards. Do not edit with your own policy. Also Wikipedia is not a TV guide as per WP:NOTVGUIDE for updating according to time slots. Please go through and follow the policies properly before claiming someone wrong. Else, you would be barred from editing. Noobie anonymous (talk) 06:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suntv

Timing slot and no of episode are very much important for a serial. Ur edit has no information on slot and episode count.. Removing episode count would lead to loss of information for viewers. Ppl are here looking for information.. Hence it is no need to sort alphabetical order.

Have you came across actors filmography pages? Does films arranged alphabetically.. It doesn't make sense.. It's not a school attendance register.. Sorting according to time slot gives viewers more info about the airing schedule for the serials.

So dont argues with standards and useless information.. Information is must not sorting. U r removing crucial information from the wiki which is not acceptable.. So stop ur unwanted edits.. Nobody complainee you abt the previous format.. It's self explanatory..

If u sort alphabetically ppl won't know the airing time of serials.. Which are not even mentioned inside individual serials pages.. So please don't complicate things.. B103N48 (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

B103N48, I've also reverted you for the same reasons. For an encyclopedia article about a station, broadcast time really aren't that important - what IS important is what shows are being broadcast. Ideally, there would be an external link to the station's broadcast schedule which would be helpful. But including times on the article itself, that's not something for Wikipedia, and there have been more than a few discussions. You can look at the other station articles and the vast majority don't have times listed. I'm hoping you'll read the Wikipedia pages that Noobie anonymous linked above - it will give you more information. Finally, I realize that you disagree with the style, but once you've been reverted (especially a couple of times), you need to use the article talk page to discuss the changes and work with the editors to find a consensus. WP:BRD is the page that describes this process and is the generally accepted way of editing on Wikipedia. Repeatedly reverting to your preferred version, especially when multiple other editors disagree with you, is called edit-warring and can lead to problems. Ravensfire (talk) 18:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by Imagine TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Money (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kkavyanjali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iqbal Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaahin Kissii Roz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noobie Anonymous,

Do not edit without knowing the show and the actual content.There is too much of false information as it appears to be vandalism. Regards, Amiha jhunjhunwala Amiha jhunjhunwala (talk) 04:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaun Banega Crorepati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun TV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me?

I made a show's draft can you help me in fixing it. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey noobie !

Can we team up for my new article Draft:Indiawaali Maa please it's request to you. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 14:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: can you please help me?

Unknownnreasonn (talk) 05:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently i could not be that active in Wikipedia. I will see to it when i get free. Noobie anonymous (talk) 08:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: hey! Can we team up again for my new article Draft:Aye Mere Humsafar please it's request to you. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn: I have searched for references and information but could not find a relevant one for the series. May be it would take time for the information from the reliable sources. Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Yes I was also searching references for the article but I don't want unreliable sources. But again I am asking same question Can we work on my article as a team? Unknownnreasonn (talk) 17:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn:Usually, it is difficult for finding reliable references for most Indian series due to poor media coverage in that field. If I find one, I will cite it. Witg regards Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Thanks for your help. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 17:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: hey can we team up again for my new article Draft:Gold Award for Best Onscreen Jodi please it's request to you. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 06:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn: Actually, i don't have much knowledge about these awards and seeing the draft I find nothing much that i could to improve. Noobie anonymous (talk) 09:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: actually I want my draft to move in main space. Can you help me in this? Unknownnreasonn (talk) 09:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn: I understand. But Sorry, rather than Indian television series articles, I don't have any knowledge and experience in editing award articles. So it could be better if you could approach any other experienced editors for helping you. Noobie anonymous (talk) 10:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: hey can we team up again for my Draft:Brahmarakshas Season 2. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 07:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn: If if find some Information and references i will add it. Noobie anonymous (talk) 08:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous:hey noobie can we team up for my Draft:Ram Pyaare Sirf Humare. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 10:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: there's problem in my article Draft: Brahmarakshas Season 2 please can you help me in this? With Regards Unknownnreasonn (talk) 08:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn: Actually, it is WP:TOOSOON as it is poorly referenced and not satisfying minimum notability and information as of now. You should wait and should not submit until the contents are expanded for satisfying the notability. Noobie anonymous (talk) 16:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: hey noobie can you help in my draft:Indiawaali Maa as I fill the article with Reliable sources but someone move my article to draftspace I want to know the reason tell me it is wrong na? Unknownnreasonn (talk) 14:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn:It still hasn't attained minimum notability. If possible, expand the plot covering until present story and mention the characters of the cast. I think this would satisfy the notability for moving it to an article. Noobie anonymous (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: actually I does not know the present story because I don't watch the series so I can't write the plot section I want someone to fill the plot section and I does not know the characters also so I can't mention. What should I do for minimum notability? Unknownnreasonn (talk) 14:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn: Refer WP:TVSERIES which answers your questions. Noobie anonymous (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Hi Noobie can you help me in my draft:Ram Pyaare Sirf Humare as I think it gain the minimum notability. Please help me to expand the page more. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 10:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn: No not yet. The cast section should be expanded and few more references would do. Noobie anonymous (talk) 10:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Hi Noobie, can you help me in my draft:Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Mein as I think it gain the minimum notability. Please help me to expand the page more. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 17:11, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: hey noobie someone named User:Torterra Ketchum 399 is continually changing the article. Please help me into stop this user from continuous wrong editing. With regards Unknownnreasonn (talk) 15:14, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NOOBIE ANONYMOUS: THE ARTICLE IS GHUM HAI KISIKEY PYAAR MEIIN. Please Help me. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 15:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Hello can you help me in my new article Molkki. Please help me to expand the page more. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 06:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn: As of now there are no major developments or references available for the series. Molkki lacks in many aspects. Infobox has nothing significant information like producers, writers, references premiere date etc. There are few casts mentioned but their characters are not known. With these main informations missing, creating a draft is not feasible and would be rejected. So please see to it that once you get significant informations like this, start creating the drafts with references for any series and not merely just soon after the title and leads alone are announced. Thank you. Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:13, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Thank you for giving this informations. I will definitely obey your order. With regards Unknownnreasonn (talk) 08:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn: Please do not take it as an order. I just provided the information to my knowledge so that you do not need to face the declination of the drafts frequently. Thank you. Noobie anonymous (talk) 09:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Hey noobie!! Can you please redirect my Draft:Molkki to the article space. With regards Unknownnreasonn (talk) 14:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: hey noobie can you help me in my drafts. 1) Draft:Prem Bandhan (TV series) 2) Draft:Durga Mata Ki Chhaya Hope you will help me in this. With regards Unknownnreasonn (talk) 08:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: hey noobie can you merge my Draft:Namak Issk Ka to existing article of this name. Hope you will help me!! With regards Unknownnreasonn (talk) 16:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: hey noobie I want to know when Namak Issk Ka article delete? because my Draft of this name is already in submission so I want to know when this article is deleted by Wikipedia. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 11:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussions regarding it is going here:[1] I am not sure when or whether the article would be deleted as majority disagree for it. Noobie anonymous (talk) 04:03, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Is it injustice for me because I have created the article first with AfC rules but reviewers are agree with the one who created the article without AfC rules. I don't know why they are agree with him? They're saying that I bypassed the AfC rules. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 12:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unknownnreasonn: Well, that do would be bad for you, but what mainly matters for Wikipedia is the content of the topic and not who created and they consider the article notable. It would be better going with the advice of those experienced editors by including the contents of your draft, which is not present in the article, into the article. Noobie anonymous (talk) 03:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Hey noobie can you help me in my Draft:Durga Mata Ki Chhaya. With regards Unknownnreasonn (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: hey noobie someone made same page of Durga Mata Ki Chhaya can you please check it? Unknownnreasonn (talk) 10:53, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shaadimubarak.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shaadimubarak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 16:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AussieLegend: Actually, it is the official title card of the series Shaadi Mubarak which I uploaded. User:Amiha jhunjhunwala, who is unnecessarily against my proper edits and files, reverted to their file which is not even a title card. With regards Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your help in reverting vandalism in the article Anjali Gupta! Best, Noahfgodard (talk) 17:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baised editing on kasautii zindagii kay lage

This kind of baised changes leads you to parmanent ban from Wiki change. Be careful during changes, don't be baised and don't critic others just to hide your crime... Hectore123 (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hectore123:What kind of biased edit or crime do you see here? I am just following Wikipedia policies and there is nothing biased or crime in it. Wikipedia has certain policies and rules which one should follow while editing which I corrected and made you aware. And not mine, your edits are disruptive which I try correcting. The cleanup tag in the cast section is also the evident thing for it. You can even check what I said in your talk page with any well experienced editors or administrators. Noobie anonymous (talk) 04:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

clean up issue is just because of you

the issue which you are claiming by removing my edits, it was not actually removed even by removes my edit, the issue which you are talking is something else, I strictly follow wiki rules, don't blame unnecessarily me by satisfying your personal ego

@Hectore123: No you are not strictly following it. As i previously stated you should not represent replacement cast with slashes like Hina Khan/Aamna Sharif which is not a proper representation for replacement cast as per MOS:TV, WP:TVCAST and MOS:SLASH. Replacement cast should not be represented using slashes (/) like in your edits. New cast addition, despite replacement, should be added below the present cast and a description can be given of who replaced whom and why as a cast description with a reference. But you are multiple times using the disruptive slashes for it. I am just correcting you and not blaming. Try to understand, correct your edits and follow it properly.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indiawaali Maa has been accepted

Indiawaali Maa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noobie anonymous (talk) 13:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

User:Noobie anonymous can you please replace the table in Bigg Boss Tamil 1 with this. And in nominations table can you change the color codes for the 2nd and 3rd runner up and rename runner up with 1st runner-up in Snehan column. Please copy this as it needs to be same like other bb pages. Just copy it and for the section Nominations table the first and second runner up should look like this:

style="background:#7FFFD4;" | For 2nd Runner Up

DDA0DD - 3rd Runner Up

Please do it

Housemate status

Housemate	Day entered	Day exited	Result
Arav	Day 1	Day 97	Winner
Snehan	Day 1	Day 97	1st runner-up
Harish	Day 53	Day 97	2nd Runner Up
Ganesh	Day 1	Day 97	3rd Runner-up
Bindu	Day 35	Day 96	Evicted
Suja	Day 52	Day 91	Evicted
Vaiyapuri	Day 1	Day 84	Evicted
Kaajal	Day 54	Day 70	Evicted
Raiza	Day 1	Day 63	Evicted
Gayathri	Day 1	Day 56	Evicted
Shakthi	Day 1	Day 49	Evicted
Maria	Day 1	Day 42	Evicted
Oviya	Day 1	Day 41	Walked
Namitha	Day 1	Day 28	Evicted
Harathi	Day 1	Day 21	Evicted
Ganja	Day 1	Day 14	Evicted
Bharani	Day 1	Day 14	Ejected
Anuya	Day 1	Day 7	Evicted

User:Noobie anonymous you didn’t do it properly copy the table above and replace the current one with this in Bigg Boss Tamil 1 and add

==Housemates== at the end

Orphaned non-free image File:Anupamaatvseries.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anupamaatvseries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2

Hey Noobie Anonymous, I just wanted to ask why you deleted content from Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2 and redirect it to Saath Nibhaana Saathiya itself? The second season introduces a brand new story and is completely different from the former/ parent series. Check out, Beyhadh 2 which is the spiritual successor of Beyhadh. So is Ek Duje Ke Vaaste 2 and Ek Duje Ke Vaaste; actually there are "N" numbers of such examples available to check out so far. Similarly, Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2 is the spiritual successor of Saath Nibhaana Saathiya. And the series is all set to premiere in less than a week with its totally new Plot and Cast. I don't have any problems with your edits but need an elaborated clarification. I hope you understand.😃 Abhishek Kasaudhan 123 (talk) 10:24, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abhishek Kasaudhan 123: I know that it is a spiritual successor. But before this article was created, there was a draft created for the series which is under development [2] which has not yet attained minimum notability. Under which creating an article on same article is contrary. Any constructive edits can be made in the draft and it will be made an article once notability is attained. Hope you understood. Thanks Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohi (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gul Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gulaal

Hi User:Noobie anonymous could you please create a page for a show Gulaal with the full name of Zindagi Ki Har Rang – Gulaal as it was a popular show on star plus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:77:DA49:3152:302:991:5BCC (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noobie anonymous please don’t ignore this request please create page for Gulaal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:77:DA49:D027:F2FC:9149:6C0C (talk) 14:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I searched for reliable references and information. But i could not find that much information which is required for satisfying minimum notability criteria for the article. Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shaadimubarak.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shaadimubarak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please sir

Hi sir, please create endrendrum Punnagai (TV series) article sir. it is a tamil language soap opera. u just create, then i will modify and change it with reliable source. please sir. 2409:4072:6C9F:F369:4B20:A223:2AB8:D224 (talk) 04:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then, it is better that you yourself can create a Wikipedia account which requires nothing much rather than email account and start your editing rather than like this. Noobie anonymous (talk) 12:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No sir, i don't know to create a article. As i saw your creating tamil serial article like baakiyalakshmi and your edits like Abhiyum Naanum. Thats why am saying sir please create endrendrum Punnagai (TV series) please sir. You just create sir, then i will modify and edit. please sir. 2409:4072:495:5F73:13A0:EDF4:47C8:4714 (talk) 12:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the series Endrendum Punnagai, I know nothing about it other than it is aired on Zee Tamil and could not find proper reliable references like The Times of India, The Indian Express, India Today, etc and could not be able to create an article on it which would not be acceptable and be deleted immediately by patrollers or administrators.

You not knowing anything on creating or editing articles is not a problem. Everything would be new at the beginning. But there is a detailed editors guide and also well experienced editors would guide through understanding on Wikipedia's policies and ways to edit. I understand your interest for creating and editing the topic of your interest. But rather than my contribution for it, you could contribute well on the topic which would be the apt one. Here is the link where you can create an article with instructions provided there prior you have an account created: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation

With regards Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the series Endrendrum Punnagai series, these are source following:

Sir, you can refer these reference and create the article sir. As Abhiyum Naanum serial also not find proper reliable references like The Times of India, The Indian Express, India Today. But it was created. So please create it sir by using those references. Please sir.. Also you look its tamil article of endrendrum Punnagai serial. 2409:4072:E9C:4B6C:1AD2:EF38:6716:B960 (talk) 12:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I will see to it as soon as possible. Thank you for providing references. Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Imlie.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Imlie.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shanno Ki Shaadi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star One.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dadasaheb

Hi there, re: this, you should be aware that we only care about notable awards, and just because an award entity copies the name of India's Dadasaheb Phalke Awards, doesn't mean that it is notable. The real Dadasaheb Phalke Award is the equivalent of a lifetime achievement award for "outstanding contribution to the growth and development of Indian cinema". One person wins it each year and it has no categories like "Popular icon". Please see WP:DADASAHEB. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:38, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Oh, I had no idea on that. Thanks for explaining. Noobie anonymous (talk) 08:06, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Intinti Gruhalakshmi.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Intinti Gruhalakshmi.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Empire AS ^Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS ^Talk! 18:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Empire AS: Thank you for your wishes. Wishing you the same. Noobie anonymous (talk) 03:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Empire AS ^Talk! 08:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Endrendumpunnagaitvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Endrendumpunnagaitvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Endrendumpunnagaitvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Endrendumpunnagaitvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Critical response to reception

Your edits with Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?...Ek Baar Phir are becoming disruptive to me. First off, your addition with the critics about the show should not be included. You need to read the talk page and analyze the dispute. You cannot simply present me with a single quote that has no reference to what you are actually trying to say. Secondly, the addition of another critic that you did is not valid. It is not from a reliable source for critics. We cannot gather random views from random websites on random people and label them as critics. If that's the case, that means anyone can say something about a show and then I can include that in the article. No, that's not how things work for critical response. Additional note: I have watched the show and I can confidently say that the second labelled "critic" is wrong. No belts or sticks were used to show beating. That cannot be included. It's all simply false. Your addition with the title of "Astha" does not need to be included as Wikipedia itself is not to put all information on the article. If they considered 20 titles for the show, would you list all of them. You cannot do that and that would be foolish. We do not need multiple references for to prove something. Refrain from editing this page as you may be a bit confused. RYLELT7 (talk) 07:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RYLELT7: Firstly, I added those contents only after analysing the talk page. Your main concern was that the critic made is for few episodes only. Cyphoidbomb clearly said that adding critics, despite being for initial few episodes is also acceptable and may be expanded if available for entire series. There is also no such prohibition by Wikipedia that partial review of a series should not be included. As per Cyphoidbomb's suggession in talk page,"If it bothers you that this was based on early episode(s), that's easily qualified with "Early in the show's run, so-and-so described a lack of chemistry between ...", I mentioned the critic of Indian Express as a review for initial few episodes before mentioning their review statements. Production section is meant for covering all possible developments of the show considering which I just added one more title which they considered with a source and there is nothing to fuss about in it comparing it with arbitrary cases of 20 or more titles.

As per WP:ICTFSOURCES, Deccan Herald is a reliable source. I don't know how you confidently claim Deccan Herald false or wrong and no beating was shown in the series. I found a episode in Hotstar aired on 26 April 2014 [3] captioned Niranjan beats Anjali where he is seen beating her with a stick.

Whatever I included were not even wrong and are as per Wikipedia policies and guidelines. It seems that you are confused or not clearly aware of it. Noobie anonymous (talk) 14:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: If you were able to actually know what's going on, I objected that inclusion for now. It's an on-going dispute and you adding it clearly means you are not reading it. They way the critic worded it by saying "crackling killer chemistry" and "the leads need to pump it up" she said that by the first 5 episodes while comparing the entire season of the first. This right here is the biggest reason for not being included. You really think in the first 5 episodes they are going to show intimate scenes? Doesn't matter what the critic thinks, it's still supposed to somewhat appropriate for inclusion. Secondly, as for the titles where does it say that every development is supposed to be included? Its not. We summarize what articles have to say. As for the second critic, it's not independent of the article. It also seems you have a misconcpetion here: I said that the CRITIC is wrong not the source. Furthermore, I also no notice that you edit with ratings for every week, If a show goes on for 5 years, are you going to add 260 weeks? No you woild not becasue that would be foolish and readers will just ignore it. So, it seems like you like adding everything into an article and that's not how editing should be done. Its wikipedia's guideline where we supposed to summarize of articles have to say and provided references independent to the topic. I don't understand your passion over adding such contents here. And no sticks or belts were shown him BEATING. I do not understand whats so horrific. RYLELT7 (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point for the critics of comparison with season 1. Would you agree of including them stating the initial pace of the series being slow as a critic from it? That doesn't seem wrong. And for the second one by Deccan Herald, it was you who said It is not from a reliable source for critics. We cannot gather random views from random websites on random people and label them as critics. in the beginning of this section for which I defended it as a reliable one. And for the ratings, as an encyclopaedia including the ratings of each episode is permissible and just because it would become lengthier in future it doesn't mean that we should stop constructing it or only focus on major dropouts. In that case, it would be better creating a separate sub article space for it as like for episode lists of many series or any other solution rather than simply removing those. Do check Cyphoidbomb's recent message in Anupamaa's talk page where they also mean the same. And for the usage of sticks, do see this episode: https://www.hotstar.com/in/tv/iss-pyar-ko-kya-naam-doon-ek-baar-phir/152/niranjan-beats-anjali/1000003850 of 26 April 2014 where Niranjan uses a stick to beat his wife as said in the reference. With regards Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, regarding the ratings for every episode, there actually is no huge concern with that. So, I guess you can continue to add ratings for the show. Coming back to ipk.. per MOS:TVRECEPTION it says it is best to seek critical reviews that look at the series as a whole and They should not just be descriptions of the episodes, that inclusion with the critique violates this policy. MOS are constructed based off community preferences so must adhere to it. This critique in in this article you can see she is A) not looking at the series as a whole B) giving her criticism based off the first episode . We cannot add that critique for inclusion regardless even if we indicate based off early episodes. I hope your now starting to realize how its not accurate because she is comapring the first episode with the entire season of the first. With the beating, I have watched the show and that episode that you are guiding me it, that's the episode where the show begins its new twist. That is the only episode where you will see beating to set the tone for the next months. However, as far as the second critique is concerned I have added a reasonable critical response that captures the series on highlighting domestic violence as opposed to "beating with sticks" because that it not what this show offers to show disturbing scenes like how other domestic violence shows do. You will see that there is no further beating that takes place in all 542 episodes. I also want thank your edits with Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon 2 for adding viewership numbers. Thanks for understanding. Regards, RYLELT7 (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MOS says it BEST and not as NECESSARY. To achieve the best one we should improvement from providing good and better format informations first. Leave the comparisons with season 1. Besides, that Indian Express critic also say "The show runs in slow motion,exaggerated pauses and lavish sets." There are no critics found which covers any entire Indian series. Either we would find for initial episode or for certain tracks as like beating here or no single critic for Indian series, but cannot find a single critic as a whole covering the series. Every section will have a starting point and then it could be developed further. Just because the information provided is initial one, it would be unfair to not even include it rather than developing it further. Like wise this critic of Indian Express serves as a initial review. In the upcoming edits, on searching for sources we can expand it by including the latest reviews from the same organization as like initially they stated the pace being slow but later appreciated for becoming a fast pace series. Something is better than nothing. Instead of completely neglecting the entire critic for being initial one, we can try to expand the critic from the same organization published at different periods. That's what I mean as a whole and is also not any violation of MOS. That's how we could build and make the information and the article standard more better and better to achieve a good quality article. Hope you understand my points. With regards. Noobie anonymous (talk) 12:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. We will try to find reviews that take the series into consideration or provide enough context and sufficient context that makes readers understand that why they praised or criticized the series as said in the MOS. If we can find more reviews, we can begin to develop that section by adding critic A and the explaining why Critic X or Y disagreed with critic A. However, if we are unable to develop that section that certain critic should be omitted from inclusion because as indicated in MOS:TVRECEPTION They should not just be descriptions of the episodes, that critic had given her say on the first episode. Being that this is a television article the MOS also suggests that it should not be selective chosen reviews. I'll just refer you to articles like Breaking Bad, Mad Men, Lethal Weapon, Game of Thrones. In these articles, I had made changes to the critical reception and the community over there haven't viewed it as problematic. If you see their advanced critical reception, you would be able to recognize that these critics take the season into consideration. It's the same thing I am trying to do here. Even features articles on television on Wikipedia, all seem to follow the MOS, so I don't see why this would any different. As mentioned earlier, I agree that we should find more critics to justify that Indian Express girl, but if we can't find any, I don't see even a slightest reasonable idea why we include that critic. Regards, RYLELT7 (talk) 18:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Titlecardofishqbaaaz.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Titlecardofishqbaaaz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarabhai vs Sarabhai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WION.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ayemerehumsafar.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ayemerehumsafar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saath Nibhaana Saathiya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anupamaatvseries.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anupamaatvseries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Akbarkabalbirbal.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Akbarkabalbirbal.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lockdown Ki Love Story

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lockdown Ki Love Story. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please do not add excessive space to articles. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 15:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jellysandwich0: My last edit on the article was on 27 January 2021. And seeing by the recent edits, it is an IP user who made disruptive edits which you reverted. I hope that this message was mistakenly published by you in my talk page. Thank you. Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:23, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Are you aware that you added a large amount of space to the Infobox on January 24 at 08:28? Jellysandwich0 (talk) 00:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jellysandwich0: I am not aware and have also not added the spaces intentionally. I edited the article in visual editing mode and am surprised to see those spaces being added automatically which I did not even add which cannot be made in visual editing mode to add spaces in infobox. Noobie anonymous (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Perhaps, after comparing edits, you unknowingly revised an old version of the page. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 14:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Akbarkabalbirbal.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Akbarkabalbirbal.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anupamaa

On April 16 at 11:37, you replaced normal writing with poor grammar and lengthy, awkward writing. "because of which" is lengthy, "for which" suffices. "gets humiliated" sounds worse than "is humiliated". Avoid using "gets" as a helping verb. "has an extra-marital affair since eight years" is clumsy and incorrect, "has had an extra-marital affair for eight years" is correct. "always keeps underestimating" sounds clumsy, "continually underestimates" is to-the-point. "gets tensed ending in" is poor writing. "his Anupamaa" is wrong: She is not a possession. In English, "Shah family's" should be preceded by a definite article, therefore "The Shah family's". "comes to know" is clumsy, "learns" sounds better and is shorter. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anupamaa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Your most recent editing is problematic. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 06:10, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jellysandwich0:For your information, I have not performed any edits constituting vandalism. I make edits providing proper references. It is some random IPs disrupting cast order or plot or unnecessary or unsourced information not as per MOS:TV which I revert to a stable version. Noobie anonymous (talk) 14:43, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Noobie anonymous: Some of your edits made yesterday to the article have been reverted. Please stop rearranging the cast section over and over. Again, there were problems with punctuation, capitalisation, grammar, and awkward English. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are disrupting the cast order deviating MOS:TV. Your edit has the cast arranged in a random order. The cast order which I made was as per MOS:TV arranging based on ascending order of appearance and not a random one. You could have made the corrections in it rather than again disrupting the proper cast order. Now I will try to retrieve the proper cast order along with your corrections. Noobie anonymous (talk) 05:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Intiki Deepam Illalu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Intiki Deepam Illalu. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:53, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intiki Deepam Illalu (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intiki Deepam Illalu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Intiki Deepam Illalu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noobie anonymous! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rudrakaal

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rudrakaal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please do not add excessive space to articles. When you previously did this on "Lockdown Ki Love Story", I explained this to you on 6 April 2021. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 16:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am unaware of it. I don't know how those extra spaces get added automatically when I did not add it manually. Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

reverting

You recently undid my edit to Shaadi Mubarak. It was a good edit and has been restored. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 17:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Noobie anonymous:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1200 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Giriprasad Damodar 02 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giriprasad Damodar 02. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noobie anonymous (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use only one account which is this (Noobie anonymous) and I don't have any other account. I have been editing since about three years in articles related to Indian television. Your statement is completely wrong of claiming me as a sockpuppet user. I have not made any disruptive edits which you can see from my edit history. All of those were constructive following Wikipedia's policies only. I have no link with the user Giriprasad Damodar 02. Especially considering my recent edits, they were mostly adding reliable sourced information or ratings related to the series or either correcting the disruptive information which has no match with the edits of Giriprasad which are unsourced and disruptive. Some pages edited by us might be same but not all and both of our edit style does not even match a bit. They edited mostly Tamil language related television articles but I have edited Hindi, Telugu, Tamil, Kannada, Bengali and few more languages related articles also providing information being constructive while edits by Giriprasad seems unconstructive. Seems that the discussion has been going on since many weeks where me along with few other accounts were being suspected of being sock which I wasn't even aware of which I came to know today only after this block notice. You have misunderstood. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

If it were just checkuser evidence I'd leave it to someone with access to review this, but it seems like there is behavioral evidence that has convinced one of the admins involved, and I think he's right from what I can see. Nothing you said above really does anything to refute that. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Noobie anonymous (talk) 17:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've been going over the editing histories of Noobie anonymous, Anonymous9802 and Anonymous attitude who I just discovered. My original thought that the similarity in names was highly significant has been tempered by my perusing the list of usernames and discovered that there's literally 1000's of usernames that start with "anonymous". I've also noticed some patterns in Noobie anonymous's edit comments that aren't shared with Giriprasad Damodar 02. The bottom line is I'm no longer as sure as I was earlier, so I'm going to unblock. My apologies if there was a mis-identification. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith: It's ok. Thank you for understanding. Noobie anonymous (talk) 03:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Intinti Gruhalakshmi.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Intinti Gruhalakshmi.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KasautiiZindagiikay2018.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KasautiiZindagiikay2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Intiki Deepam Illalu AfC

The draft you accepted is essentially same as the one which you yourself submitted and was rejected. The added ToI ref is not even about this show, but about a remake. Please put it back to draft because in mainspace, it's liable to be nominated for deletion. hemantha (brief) 10:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Imlie.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Imlie.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of To Aganara Tulasi Mun

The article To Aganara Tulasi Mun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV soap opera

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 12:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Noobie anonymous! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed on the AFC's participants list, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months. Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to regain access to the AFCH script, you can do so at any time by visiting WT:AFCP. Thank you for your work at AFC, and if you start editing Wikipedia again we hope you will rejoin us. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:03, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Starmahila.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Starmahila.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baakiyalakshmi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baakiyalakshmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baakiyalakshmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tirishan (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayutha Ezhuthu (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayutha Ezhuthu (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayutha Ezhuthu (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Karnataka (talk) 17:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ayuthaezhuthutvseries.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ayuthaezhuthutvseries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anbevaa2020tvseries.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Mein

Hello, Noobie anonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Mein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anupamaatvseries.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anupamaatvseries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anupamaatvseries.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anupamaatvseries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]