User talk:Noctown

This is Noctown's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: L E M F R E C K (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:L E M F R E C K and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:L E M F R E C K, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noctown! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: L E M F R E C K (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:L E M F R E C K and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:L E M F R E C K, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 08:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you able to help us in how we make this right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welsh_hip-hop

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_of_Wales

these pages mentions the person whos page we tried to provide information on.

We are struggling to change username but understand that needs to be changed. We do not get any compensation in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement. We understand the reason for the block and that and even though we believe it was a misunderstanding, will not repeat this kind of edit again.

Thanks Noctown (talk) 11:42, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Noctown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Wavgod (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am not trying to promote im trying to provide information on an artist, i also didn't know the username policy meant i couldn't use a username i use everywhere.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not for merely providing information; that is considered promotional here. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a musician, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. Please review conflict of interest and paid editing, and if you want to edit about any topics other than those for which you have a COI, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 01:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is incorrect, we are a journalistic output who have knowledge on the welsh music scene specifically music of black origin in wales, it just happened to be one of the people apart of that scene came under conflict of interest. There was no promotion intended, just information on someone who is a huge part of that scene with his own BBC documentary.

We were created to spotlight and provide information on black musicians in Wales. A major talking point, no longer allowing us to do so because we know one of many is problematic in so many ways and only makes the issue worse. Noctown (talk) 14:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:L E M F R E C K

Hello, Noctown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:L E M F R E C K, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rename not successful and UTRS appeal #58442

The chosen username is too similar to an existing username or it used to be username of someone else that got renamed. The software won't do it. Please choose again. Thanks,

UTRS 58442 is declined. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I change it to Callingzooport Noctown (talk) 10:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]