User talk:Nobreadsticks

2015 FIFA U-20 World Cup

Hey, friend. Why are you fixing something that doesn't need to be fixed.--SirEdimon (talk) 21:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SirEdimon! That stat does need to be fixed. If you go to the link that you are claiming is the source, scroll down and click the PDF that says "Match Report". (its at the way bottom) FIFA's technical study group re-attributed the goal to Jameison just today. Here is the direct link if you want it: http://resources.fifa.com/mm/document/tournament/competition/02/61/74/85/eng_13_0602_nzl-usa_fulltime_neutral.pdf Nobreadsticks (talk) 22:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see. We need to find an away to resolve this, because it's nonsense to have an article that says one thing and that mentions a oficial match report, that says another thing.--SirEdimon (talk) 22:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, FIFA needs to change all of their stats if they change something like this. You can't say that you gave the goal to Jameison, but don't show it anywhere but one place. They need to be a bit faster Nobreadsticks (talk) 22:23, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extra Prem FA Cup

Many thanks for filling that in. I've just done the FA Trophy which has half as many teams in the first round and it nearly killed me. I'll continue with the next round asap. User:GNEbandit (talk) 08:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I knew it was going to be a big project, but it was a lot more work then I was expecting. At least now the rounds will get easy as it advances a stage. --Nobreadsticks (talk) 08:25, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Columbus Crew

I've explained why what you consider listing as honours are obviously not honours. A fan made award where half the time a trophy wasnt awarded and the "prize" of which was the opposing chairman wearing a rival team's shirt in public is not a professional football honour. This on top of the fact there arent even any sources for any of these. You reverted my last edit with no explanation so if you want, you can explain to me why you are so persistent with these and we can discuss it here, so we do not end up in an edit war.

I suggest if you are so keen to keep them listed that we mark them as friendly and keep them in the section. Typically we do not list friendlies but if we note the difference between them and the pro honours, then I guess that would be fair in the interest of a compromise. What do you think? Davefelmer (talk) 04:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I was probably be a little too defensive about them. I'm a Columbus fan, so I probably felt a bit to strongly about them, but in hindsight you're probably correct. You can go ahead and fix it. Sorry. Nobreadsticks (talk) 04:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, we can all get a little passionate about our clubs! Davefelmer (talk) 06:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nemeth

Hi. With Nemeth being part of the Columbus Crew roster enough to warrant having them listed in his career list, I'd want to see something which showed Nemeth was listed on their roster page, the MLS club roster page, a club announcement of him holding a shirt, a press release? There aren't any of these except to say he had his rights acquired and was immediately traded? I think mentioning his time with Columbus, due to MLS wacky mechanics, in his bio is enough without listing it in his clubs list? (Talk) 10:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2017 CONCACAF League bracket listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:2017 CONCACAF League bracket. Since you had some involvement with the Template:2017 CONCACAF League bracket redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 04:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you recently removed content from Major League Soccer without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:16, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 AFC U-16 Championship

Hey there! Thanks for your edits on the 2018 AFC U-16 Championship page. Thanks for undoing the vandalism. But the attendance one though is not vandalism, as according to official sports data websites, the matches have been finished and their attendance recorded. You can confirm about the same here.--Anbans 585 (talk) 10:15, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Anbans 585: Yeah, sorry. I just did a widespread revert and caught your stuff in it. I'll make sure to double check next time. Nobreadsticks (talk) 10:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All-time Columbus Crew roster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Ramirez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Forbes (footballer, born 1990). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giant Snowman 08:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How are World Cup qualifiers and Concacaf nations league matches unofficial matches? Please stop removing my edits frivolously while saying "NFT" with no further explanation. Nobreadsticks (talk) 09:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]