User talk:NoCoRadioAdvocate

Hello, NoCoRadioAdvocate, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 18:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at KBPI, you may be blocked from editing. Nate • (chatter) 22:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at KBPI. Stop reverting helpful edits. Nate • (chatter) 22:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Your recent editing history at KBPI shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MB 22:08, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User Mrschimpf is continuing to add incorrect or irrelevant information to the KBPI page, which is why I have reverted it to it's previous design.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:NoCoRadioAdvocate reported by User:MB (Result: ). Thank you. MB 22:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You've been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to violating the 3 revert rule. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 23:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended

Block extended to one week for using an IP to evade the block. That will not work. Please do better. El_C 00:11, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appologies, El_C, but I stopped editing after warned and tried to engage the other user via his talk page, but he would not respond - he just deleted my comments.