User talk:Nithinj

Wikipedia is a democratic forum, as a user I have every right to edit. Please don't behave as the sole custodian of wikipedia standards. Such phoney threats shall be dealt with in an appropriate manner. Also, if you continue your slander, reporting the same to Wikipedia would be contemplated and you may have to bear the consequences.Thank you.

Your edits on Communist Party of India (Marxist)

Hi,

I have initiated a discussion on the talk of the article Communist Party of India (Marxist). Please participate in the discussion and share your concerns on the reliability of sources used. --Deshabhakta (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Communist Party of India (Marxist), you will be blocked from editing. Despite having been invited to participate in a discussion and resolve any contentious content on the article, you are reverting well sourced material from the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deshabhakta (talk • contribs) 17:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In what sense would Nithinj´s edits qualify as vandalism? Bear in mind that edit conflicts over content is not vandalism, and that every time you save a page on Wikipedia you agree to the statement "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.". Putting phoney warning templates on other users´ talk pages is not conducive for a productive debate. --Soman (talk) 19:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Communist Party of India (Marxist), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Despite having been invited to participate in a discussion several times and resolve any contentious content on the article, you are reverting well sourced material from the article. You call my edits as lies without any reliable sources to call them lies. The reliability of my sources is already discussed and agreed on RSN. Even when a dispute resolution request you are continuing with reverting well sourced content from this article. --Deshabhakta (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a democratic forum, as a user I have every right to edit. Please don't behave as the sole custodian of wikipedia standards. Such phoney threats shall be dealt with in an appropriate manner. Also, if you continue your slander, reporting the same to Wikipedia would be contemplated and you may have to bear the consequences.Thank you.

Yes, its a democratic medium. That does not mean you are going to undo others' edits just because you dont like them or you think them to be lies. You are showing no interest in discussing based on wiki policies. In all my discussions I have not used any slander. Thank you and be a constructive editor on wiki. --Deshabhakta (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Communist Party of India (Marxist) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 07:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Communist Party of India (Marxist). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Shadowjams (talk) 07:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Communist Party of India (Marxist), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Any more vandalism on this site will be marked as a request to be blocked. Mr. R00t ^{Leave me a Message} 01:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comrade

Hi comrade, The user "Deshbhakta", is reverting the every responsible edit on the Communist Party of India (Marxist), by labeling it as vandalism. Plz. support my call on the disscussion page of CPIM article, and make your self count in the general consensus against slanted reverts...

Viplovecomm (talk) 21:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of George Padamadan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on George Padamadan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- HindWiki^Connect 23:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]