User talk:Nissiongot

Welcome!

Hello, Nissiongot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as How to insert pictures in wikimedia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lugia2453 (talk) 17:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of How to insert pictures in wikimedia

The article How to insert pictures in wikimedia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't really seem all that necessary. It's more of a how-to guide than an encyclopedia article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lugia2453 (talk) 17:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The printers

Hello Nissiongot,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, The printers, may be copied from http://3minfotech.net/index.php?route=product/category&path=59. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 04:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Wikipedia (Tour and Basics)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Wikipedia (Tour and Basics). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Wikipedia:Introduction. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Wikipedia:Introduction – you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:Wikipedia:Introduction|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 11:05, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of World we live

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mdann52 (talk) 14:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Wikipedia is not a medium for publishing original thought, as you did at World we live. I strongly suggest not creating any more new articles until you have more experience of how Wikipedia works, and what is acceptable here, because if you continue to create unsuitable articles, you are likely to be blocked from editing. A much better plan is to start by just making small improvements to existing articles, so that you can gradually learn what is acceptable, and after a while you will know enough to be able to create new articles without the risk that they will all get deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page Structure of atom, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. Also, please do not create any article without first checking that we do not already have an article on the subject. The subject is already covered in the article Atom. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Born to save us

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Born to save us, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lyricsmania.com/born_2_run_lyrics_alessandro_bonan.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 16:00, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Born to save us

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Born to save us requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bgwhite (talk) 06:41, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Born to save us, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. The most serious problem with this article was the fact that it was a copyright infringement. You must not post content to Wikipedia that you have copied from elsewhere, unless you can provide clear proof that the content either is in the public domain or has been released for reuse under a free license. However, even if there were no copyright issue, the article would have been entirely unsuitable. I have already made a suggestion about how you should edit in order to avoid having all your work deleted (see under the heading "February 2013" above) and I very strongly urge you to take that advice. It would be a pity if you were to be indefinitely blocked from editing, because you really could make useful contributions if you would just take a little care and effort to learn how Wikipedia works before creating lots of new articles. Please feel very welcome to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:53, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Triple man powerbomb

The article Triple man powerbomb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable wrestling move.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:44, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Agame.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Agame.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mdann52 (talk) 14:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Triple man powerbomb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Triple man powerbomb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triple man powerbomb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 14:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. In addition to the problems already mentioned, some of your articles contain substantial amounts of text which is not written in coherent English. Since the last time that you were warned about copyright, you have created at least one more article which contained copyright-infringing text. I have repeatedly tried to encourage you to have a different approach to editing Wikipedia, in the hope of helping you. However, since you are failing to take note of the messages given to you by various editors, including me, I am now giving you a short token block, in the hope that doing so will alert you to the fact that the problems are to be taken seriously. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions, but please take note of the various messages you have been given. I really do hope that you will avoid becoming blocked for a long period, which is what will happen if you continue in the same way. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Triple man powerbomb. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 12:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WWE signature moves

The article WWE signature moves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unencyclopedic article, lacking sources. reads like a gushing fan page

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WWE signature moves for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WWE signature moves is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE signature moves until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 06:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tag team John Cena and Randy Orton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tag team John Cena and Randy Orton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tag team John Cena and Randy Orton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Examphobia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Examphobia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Examphobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Examphobia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Examphobia, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:54, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Tag team John Cena and Randy Orton, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. STATic message me! 16:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WWE finishers

The article WWE finishers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WWE-cruft. Moves aren't inherently notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WWE Finishers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WWE Finishers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bisswajit (talk) 06:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WWE Finishers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Damage and Finisher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from WWE Finishers, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Bisswajit (talk) 15:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WWE Finishers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WWE Finishers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bisswajit (talk) 15:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit of Micro programming language

Hi, I was so bold to remove the section you added to Micro programming language. Imho it is not sensible to have a list of programming languages and their purposes (which could by the way never be comprehensive and will most likely be disputable) on a page meant to describe one programming language. Maybe you could rewrite the paragraph and directly compare Micro to a few well-known languages in more detail. 46.57.56.253 (talk) 21:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]