User talk:Nishkid64/Archive 43

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Support of lockdown

I support your decision to lock down the Che Guevara article for 5 days ... and believe that actually a lockdown of a month may even be needed ... especially considering the height of editor's passions and intractability of current disputes. A “lengthy” cooling down period for all parties on the article, may be in good order. Thanks. Redthoreau (talk TR 21:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you relock the article for 7 more days to allow the editors more time to discuss the necessary changes ? Thanks. Redthoreau (talk TR 17:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bhindranwale

I'm getting fed up with vandalism by Ajjay.

I would appreciate some input from you, as I see you as pretty fair.

Firstly he keeps on saying Bhindranwale Mastered Punjabi. He didn't.

Bhindranwale did not master any language PERIOD - its like saying PeeWee Herman mastered English Language. Its nonsense.

Bhindranwale could speak Punjabi to some extent like any peasant, but to suggest he mastered it or had a Masters in Punjabi is totally false. Like any other religious fundamentalist, he had a single agenda based on the segregation between Sikhs and non-sikhs which led to brutality against various communities by armed terrorists (now banned)

Secondly, the Sikh 'national' anthem "Deh Shiva....is always vandalised by Ajjay, I hope you get a chance to see what I mean, thanks, Dave 'Boy' Green (Student of Indology) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.3.244 (talk) 01:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC) See your talk page. If you are indologist, then i am also a history student specialisng in modern indian history relating to punjabi suba movement and sikh historyAjjay (talk) 16:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly check user:90.196.3.244

He is going crazy. I havee warned him. Please do something about him.ThanksAjjay (talk) 15:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Khampalak

Nishkid64, I'm afraid you mis-read the findings at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/NisarKand. On 12 Feb RomainSnd was reported as a suspected sock of NisarKand but Alison replied that RomainSnd was instead a sock of Khampalak. I have rechecked all the findings and commented at RFCU/Khampalak. Thatcher 15:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again

Have you checked the Sikh article. Please do me a favour and clean it up. If you decide to do it then

Fix the spaces, esp. in representation section. (huge gaps)
re-write ref. to harward citations.
remove pov(there is lots of it, esp. relating to op blue star and gandhi etc.) please fix without any major changes.

If you get in edit war with some pov editor, i will back you up(as if you can,t handle that, I still remember my edit war with you).ThanksAjjay (talk) 16:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Voynich manuscript

Hi there, I noted a while back at the FAR for this article that you were going to work on sourcing. Did you ever get a chance to dig into that? I'd like to help "save" the article, but it's difficult without having access to the sources. --Laser brain (talk) 20:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

You have a couple of replies here in Oppose #33. Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 13	24 March 2008	About the Signpost

Single User Login enabled for administrators	Best of WikiWorld: "Clabbers"
News and notes: $3,000,000 grant, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Banner shells tame talk page clutter	WikiProject Report: Video games
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Coaching

Hey Nishkid, I'm trying to find somebody who will take User:Rgoodermote under their arms and train help them to become an admin. I've taken a look at Rgooder's edits and think he has potential. The big problem that he has is that he is primarily a Vandal Fighter and isn't into article development... so I was looking for an admin coach who understands vandal fighting and might be able to help Rgooder find the experience he needs to become an admin in other ways. He had a failed RfA which would be a good place to see what areas he needs help with. If you think you might be able to help him out that would be great! Rgooder has over 6000 edits, and unlike most vandal fighter's has earned them over a wide period of time... he's been editing solidly for a over half a year.Balloonman (talk) 06:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Nish, just checking to see if you were interested or unavailable? I would love to have you help Rgooder out, but understand if you can't right now. Either way, could you let me know (here's fine).Balloonman (talk) 05:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful World: Tour Souvenir Edition MERGE

Hi there I am new to Wikipedia's operating system and was wondering if you could merge the abovementioned with the original article 'Beautifu World' ablum as it is just a re-release of the same album. I already opened a Talk page for the merge but nobody seems interested to comment, so seeing your experience in Wiki, could you please kindly merge the 2 together. thank you.Reqluce (talk) 03:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D. B. Cooper

		The Paranormal Barnstar
		D. B. Cooper article gets promoted to FA on Monday...Tuesday, the first piece of new evidence in 28 years is found...coincidence?! Congrats on a very timely FA :) Maralia (talk) 05:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coach

Thank You, may I ask what the subpage should be called? Heads up, I may be slow in responding the next couple of weeks. Rgoodermote 17:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subpage created User:Rgoodermote/Admin_coaching I didn't know what to add. But I added somethings. Rgoodermote 17:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done sir. Rgoodermote 17:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me, will be offline the rest of the night sorry.Rgoodermote 22:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take That Beautiful World Merge

Hi there, the page 'Take That Beautiful World : Tour Souvenir EDITION', as the title suggests, is a RE-RELEASE of an album, ie a different VERSION of the same album even though it contains bonus tracks. Other pages which have been merged include Amy Winehouse's Grammy Award winning album 'Back To Black' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_to_Black) whereby the Deluxe Edition was merged with the original album, as well as Michael Jackson's most recent re-release 'Thriller 25' which was merged with the original 'Thriller' album. As also stated in the main body of the article, the album is a RE-RELEASE and hence was NOT permitted to chart.

Hence I strongly request a merge, thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reqluce (talk • contribs) 22:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Miss Ima"

	Nice job on "Miss Ima"!
	To all of the excellent editors who were part of the Karanacs-led collaboration to bring Ima Hogg to featured status, it was a pleasure working with you on such a fine article about a great lady. Thank you so much for your contribution to this fun collaboration. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ima Hogg

Nishkid, Karanacs is usually off-Wiki on weekends. Since you have the book, can you address this from the FAC?

Education section, the last paragraph, seventh sentence. College Women's Club? Which college? Rice? St. Thomas? Another one? There are a number of colleges in Houston.
- I don't have the Bernhard book; pinging Nishkid64, who has the book. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise looks pretty good! Ealdgyth - Talk 02:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another one, from the talk page at Ima Hogg, are you able to see what the book says on this and add a sentence to her Disposition section?

If you want some dirt to spice up the article, she and Arthur Rubinstein apparently despised each other.[1]Ferrylodge (talk) 14:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I am dismal with Google books; for some reason, I can't make it go. Can someone add something about this? Perhaps under her character and disposition? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nishkid, since you have the Bernhard book, and Karanacs is busy on weekends, do you have time to pop over to the talk page and answer some questions using the Bernhard book? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phan Boi Chau

Start is in place. Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 07:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Coaching

I'm considering an RfA and wonder if you would be able to offer me some assistance? I'd like to think I have a general idea of what adminship is about, but I have spent most of my time editing articles rather than in sysop-related functions and I am concerned that I will appear too inexperienced. Look forward to hearing from you. Ben MacDui ^Talk/Walk 10:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've drafted something here. Ben MacDui ^Talk/Walk 17:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Admin coaching

I completely forgot about the rest of those. I'll get right on that. Juliancolton ^{The storm still blows...} 18:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Coaching

Hey Nishkid,

I just was looking at your admin coaching page User:Juliancolton/Admin coaching and loved your practice 1 and practice 2 excercises. Do you mind if I copy them over to the admin coaching page? If so, did you come up with them or did you steal them from somebody else? I want to give credit where credit is due.Balloonman (talk) 18:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Balloonman (talk) 18:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 14	31 March 2008	About the Signpost

Wikimania 2009 to be held in Buenos Aires	Sister Projects Interview: Wikisource
WikiWorld: "Hammerspace"	News and notes: 10M articles, $500k donation, milestones
Dispatches: Featured content overview	WikiProject Report: Australia
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Cofresi

Thank you Nishkid64, for your welcomed observations. I have looked into your suggestions and you are definitely right. I have taken care of all concerns and I now believe that the article should be reconsidered for "GA" status. Do you agree? Tony the Marine (talk) 20:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question

Hey Nish, I have a quick question to ask regarding your college. How do you like George Washington University? I'm considering applying to there, Georgetown, and American University for pre-law. --Shark face 217 03:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip H. Farber (2nd nomination)

I have nominated Philip H. Farber for deletion. You previously contributed to an earlier AfD on this article and it was suggested that I notify you of the current AfD. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip H. Farber (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cheers, Pigman☿ 07:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mykungfu/Armyguy11/UnclePaco

FYI, please see User_talk:B#Mykungfu_.3D_Armyguy11. Another user believes that GomabWork (talk · contribs) is a reincarnation of our friend. I'm not confident enough for a block without checkuser evidence by any stretch of the imagination, but I wanted to get you to take a look to see what you thought. --B (talk) 01:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Georges Ruggiu2.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Georges Ruggiu2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 88.134.141.133 (talk) 18:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biographiq book on D.B. Cooper

Nishkid64, Hey, remember when you added in the "further reading" section on DB Cooper the 2008 book that came out by "Biographiq"? I was intrigued, so I bought a copy off Amazon. I'm not sure if Wikipedia has associations with Biographiq, but very much (as in, darn near the whole thing, and even organized in sub-heads just like wikipedia's article) of the book plagiarizes word for-word the wikipedia article on D.B. Cooper (or at least older versions of it). Is this legal? Just thought I would check, being that I found it odd that I ended up paying for something that I helped write in the first place.Harry Yelreh (talk) 23:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Nish. I sent an email to the address you provided. We'll see what they say. I wanted to let you know for now: I looked through the book again. It is a virtual carbon copy of the January versions of the Wikipedia D.B. Cooper article, with information up through the Dec. 31, 2007 FBI announcements and complete with the Wikipedia subheads ("You Are Being Hijacked," "Releasing Passengers in Exchange for Demands," etc.). The book does provide a full copy of the GNU Free Documentation License in the back, which apparently is one thing that it takes to get legally cleared through Wikipedia. I still don't know if it's legal, though. We'll find out. I still think at the very least it's disingenuous. If the book had said "Jan. 2008 Wikipedia article" on it, I never would have spent $10 on it. With that in mind, if it's all right with you, I'd like to remove it from the Further Reading section of the article. Because basically, as it is, our Further Reading section is telling readers: "If you want to read a lesser version of the Wikipedia article you just read, check out this book." Furthermore, the product article on Amazon.com claims that the book is 52 pages long. Well, really it's only 50, and 10 of those pages are simply a copy of the GNU Free Documentation License, which apparently allows them to sell this book. In sum, in my honest opinion: the whole thing is a complete rip-off. The "author," Biographiq, (http://www.biographiq.com) apparently has lots of other books like this out. I wonder if they're all based on Wikipedia articles. Harry Yelreh (talk) 05:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WG

Hi, I've posted some new proposals at the WG wiki and would appreciate everyone's input.[2] Check also the Recent Changes there to see pages with new activity. Thanks, El on ka 06:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:JacquesNguyen

Would you please help watch Template:History of Burma? User:JacquesNguyen changes it several times a day, accusing me of vandalism in the edit summary (I wrote the template, I am not vandalizing it, I assure you), and has never once justified his slander or changes. I see you have also had dealings with him, and would appreciate your help. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 14:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hate time...you?

I was proven dead wrong, even with all my issues I just cannot leave this place. Hence the Wikiscore. But yeah let us keep with the coaching. I was going to start work on Suspension (school punishment) it has bugged me forever. By the way, my time will be sporadic. I signed for The Marines. Rgoodermote 01:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

Where filled. Rgoodermote 23:14, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. --Shark face 217 20:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weird question

Hey Nish, I got a bit of a weird question. I've decided to get back into mostly editing articles (why I came here in the first place) and I'm trying to improve the article on foregrips, a wonderful little invention that I didn't realize existed (or at least, one I took for granted) until I spent many hours on Call of Duty 4. Improving this article has been a bit of a dog, as there isn't much on the web about this topic (that can be properly referenced) outside of online gun-parts shops. Anyway, I was wondering if you knew any Wikipedians off the top of your head that had extensive gun collections, as the page needs a free image. If not, it's understandable, as I have been a few places already and have yet to find anyone with foregrips. Thanks --Sharkface^T/_C 00:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kannada literature

Sir, currently this article is in Rfc. So far, the initiator of the Rfc, Fowler, has not been able to disprove any of my citations (please read last para in [3]). user:Abecedare is moderating this whole thing and even did a weekend's research to validate my claims in the article. Perhaps being dissatisfied with the outcome, Fowler is now introducing large amounts of data (UNDUE) into the article, even as Abecedare is working on the content that is acceptable and fair. An edit war is looming here. I and another user (KNM) have asked them to hold off untill Abecedare comes along to resolve it. A highly UNDUE claim is being made about the dating of Halmidi inscription which though Fowler has prouced a few citations, pales in front of hundred or so citations that give it a more precise date (the one I had used, 450 CE/5th century). Aadal has now joined in the edit warring. I request that the original version be restored so we can give Abecedare the space he needs to resolve the issue amicably. Please lock up the artcle until such a time that Abecedare is ready to mediate. He said he is busy for a couple of days, on Saturday.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 15:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admin coaching

Whoa! I completely forgot about my coaching page. I finished those questions, so when you have time just check over them and see how I did. Thanks, Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

How are you! hope you are doing well! Regarding Bhindranwale, do you think that the term "hyperactive" "Anti-social" belongs in the article. It is not cited and might, just might be an individuals view. Besides the ref. for "not very intelligent" is contradictory. Please see discussion. Also the intro sys he was a militant leader, recently added, then it must also state him to be a Martyr. I have Tullys ref. which states that "despite govt. propaganda, he remains a martyr for Sikhs". Also well referenced observation by mark Jurgensmeyer , which was added by me was deleted. It needs to be added back. I left a message on talk page of article too. thanks Shalimer (talk) 06:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J. R. Richard

Since you seem to be the top contributor to the article, do you have the exact page #'s for some of the books? I split it into notes and refs, similar to Stanley Cup (FA). I'm seeing what else I can do with the article. Than perhaps we can nominate it for FA? Thanks. - Milk's favorite Cookie 20:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't had a chance to completely read over the article - although I will go do that now. One other random question: I saw Homi J. Bhabha on your to-do list; is it "Homi J. Bhabha" or "Homi K. Bhabha" according to this? - Milk's favorite Cookie 21:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I didn't know. Would you like to go ahead with an FAC? - Milk's favorite Cookie 23:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I would still say that the article is overdone with stats, as you mentioned one major problem in its previous FAC. and the references on this article are formatted really oddly. The article is A class + GA. - Milk's favorite Cookie 23:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you can wait until the weekend, I can spend some quality time on it.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 23:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We really have to change the title to this. That's obvious POV/weasel words. Anything you would suggest? - Milk's favorite Cookie 23:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And "Richard paid $669,000 in a divorce settlement to his ex-wife, Carolyn" Carolyn Richard? Or something else? - Milk's favorite Cookie 00:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I doubt it's this That is the only relevant source that comes up. I will however, look for others. - Milk's favorite Cookie 00:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done You can delete the image as well. Milk’s Favorite Cookie ^(Talk) 01:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lou Gehrig

Can you check out the article and/or assess it for GA? The images obviously are a problem (most are fair use) Should this image (fair use) be deleted and replaced with this image (PD); Although that's a shot of him at Columbia University. Thanks for the help - MILK'S FAVORITE COOKIE ^(Talk) 22:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please let me know when you are ready to nominate J.R. Richard. Thanks. - MILK'S FAVORITE COOKIE ^(Talk) 22:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed and tagged the image as orphan. Would you recommend replacing it with the image of him at Columbia University? Milk’s Favorite Cookie ^(Talk) 23:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Until then... Milk’s Favorite Cookie ^(Talk) 23:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Could we wait until tomorrow so I can write up a nominating statement as well? Thanks.~~ Milk’s Favorite Cookie ^(Talk) 01:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw you came on. Can we begin? Milk’s Favorite Cookie ^(Talk) 01:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 15	7 April 2008	About the Signpost

April Fools' pranks result in temporary blocks for six admins	WikiWorld: "Apples and oranges"
News and notes: 100 x 5,000, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Reviewers achieving excellence	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 16	14 April 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
Interview with the team behind one of the 2,000th featured articles	Image placeholders debated
WikiWorld: "Pet skunk"	News and notes: Board meeting, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Featured article milestone
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mentoring

Nish, I'm wondering if you'll consider mentoring Milk's Favorite Cookie? I just removed a FAC and left him a notice (he's nommed seriously unprepared articles many times before), and I've just realized he's filled up quite a few good baseball articles with non-reliable sources (you've probably figured out I'm a baseball fan and have worked on baseball articles; I cleaned out Ty Cobb about a year ago, and Ty Cobb and Lou Gehrig and J.R. Richard are filled up now with dubious websources). MFC quickly archived my talk message to him, and my past messages don't seem to have hit the mark either. Similar issues came up on his last RfA, so perhaps mentorship would be a good idea, and I was hoping you'd be interested. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely Milk’s Favorite Cookie ^(Talk) 01:47, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nishkid, I guess our messages crossed in the night :-) Hard to see good baseball players' articles filled up with dubious sources (Ty Cobb and Lou Gehrig) after cleaning them up, but it's also troubling that MFC archived my message about his FACs very quickly, while putting up another FAC. At J. R. Richard, are you really comfortable with this source (it looks like a volunteer-drive, Wiki-type site)? I do wish someone could get MFC to slow down and understand sourcing and general Wiki standards; I don't have the list at hand, but I'm pretty sure there have been at least four unprepared noms. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sent. Milk’s Favorite Cookie ^(Talk) 01:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...

..then perhaps we should also remove " ..was a militant leader". Militant is also mentioned in the lead section. Besides there are many views as to what he was, we cannot add everything. About crusader, "Surajīta Jalandharī " was the Biographer of bhindranwale. He describes him as a crusader,[4] the book is very rare, so difficult to go through the whole thing.Shalimer (talk) 13:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes [5], but didnt mess your references, but those of pov pushers (maybe) :-) Shalimer (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bro

I swear...And i know now that you dont harbour presumed notions. i will give you a barnstar sometime.heheShalimer (talk) 16:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Banglapedia

Banglapedia should be ready for another go as a GAN. Would you care to take a look at it again? Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 07:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block of Doremon360

Dear Nishkid64.

I have noticed that Doremon360 (talk · contribs) has been blocked because he has edited like JacquesNguyen. I don't know which policy allows you blocked him that fast without giving a warn, and I strongly disagree with your block. If you suspect he is a sockpurpet of Jacques please request a CU or something like that. Doremon360 has a blog here and he's a member of Vietnamese Wikipedia (vi:User:Doremon360), accroding to his blog and his edits on Vietnamese Wikipedia, he's a man who strongly interested in origin of Vietnamese, it may made hate Chinese character and try to remove it on some Vietnam-related articles, so give him a warn, not a block. I'm writing here to ask you unblock and give him another chance to edit English Wikipedia (I have noted him at Vietnamese Wikipedia that don't remove Chinese character).

P/S: I'm writing in good faith, but my English is bad, so If I made any offensive passage(s) please forgive me.

Sincerely

Magnifier (talk) 13:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely the same person. IPs can be used that don't match the geographical location (as is done in the PRC to evade the government's blocking of Wikipedia), and clearly was in this case. Badagnani (talk) 18:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for unblocking, I'm going to notify Doremon360. He has promised that he will never try to remove Han Tu again (vi:user_talk:Doremon360, by the way, Jacques lives in United States, Doremon360 lives in Vietnam. Magnifier (talk) 18:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proof

I would kindly ask you to examine the wording of these two postings, and let me know what you think (take note of the signature, which in both cases has "Thank" without "you").

Also, see blanking of Han tu characters and focus on Southeast Asian bronze drums (both integral to the M.O. of JacquesNguyen and his many alternate accounts."

Badagnani (talk) 18:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. It's getting confusing, as it always does when a virtuoso of sockpuppeteering is in full swing. There have been so many socks all doing the same things, and Doremon appeared at exactly the time JacquesNguyen's most recent sock had been blocked, and began editing the same articles in the same manner. Badagnani (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikipediaWeekly Episode 45

Hello again! Just a note that WikipediaWeekly Episode 45 has been released. Listen and comment at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/04/14/wikipedia-weekly-45-blps-revisited/. Cheers, WODUP 20:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you no longer wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from that list.

Deletion Review for 13256278887989457651018865901401704640 (number)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of 13256278887989457651018865901401704640 (number). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 20:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the mix-up. I just assumed that you might have been watching your /Salt page for talk. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 00:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitris P. Kraniotis

Could you undelete the history of Dimitris P. Kraniotis? You deleted this article in 8. Oct. 2006, but it has been recreated in the mean time. The article has major quality issues. But if I remember correctly, some of the deleted versions already had a better quality than the current mess. Access to the earlier article history should speed up the necessary clean-up process. I don't know how else to stop this spammer from abusing Wikipedia for self-promotion… ––plauz (talk) 12:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring the history! --plauz (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello :)

Hi. You deserve every award in the world there is. Thanks for helping (me :P) tremendously on wikipedia! :) mathwhiz 29 23:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WG experiment

Hiya, I've started a thread about my experiment at WP:AN: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Hungarian-Slovakian experiment. If you have time, I'd appreciate if you could weigh in there. Thanks, El on ka 12:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naughty?

" 20:57 (Block log) . . Nishkid64 (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Nishkid64 (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Vandalism-only account: you have been a very bad boy...)" Naughty? ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 02:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering about this, too. Any particular reason for blocking yourself? Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 02:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I spent too much time playing Halo 3 today...now I've got to work on a 15 page rough draft due tomorrow. You'll see me then. :) Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 02:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that a WikiBreak is for? ;) Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 13:21, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck!⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 03:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

....You just got rickrolled ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 04:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rofl. Thanks for that. I remember the days when people would prank each other with goatse and tubgirl links. :) Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 04:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes. Lemon Party and friends. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 04:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good times, good times (when you're not on the receiving end of that...) By the way, happy bday (yesterday) and I hope you feel better. :) Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 04:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]