User talk:Nishānt Omm

Welcome!

Hello, Nishānt Omm, and welcome to Wikipedia! This is one of the most popular websites in the world, and it's only through the contributions of editors like you. And Wikipedia is not just a collection of articles, it's an active community. The real fun here is contributing to Wikipedia, but don't feel hurt if some of your first few edits get removed, as there are some central guidelines you may not be familiar with.

Some good advice: be bold in your editing, and use the talk pages to discuss with other editors. Be kind to others, because there's a lot you can learn from them, and there's lots they can help you with.

There's lots of resources to help you become a great editor, from our basic introduction to our in-depth manual. But if you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page or place {{helpme}} on this page to get any help you need. If you haven't done so, tell us a bit about yourself. Oh, and please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

Glad you're here! Bhagya sri113 (talk) 14:13, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IPA Symbols in Odisha article

Hi Nishānt Omm, I just thought I'd leave a post here to tell you that you should not change IPA symbols in any article like you have been doing in the Odisha article unless those symbols are listed phonemes in both the IPA help page (Help:IPA/Odia) and the phonology section/article of the language (Odia_language#Phonology). Neither [ɕ] or [ʃ] are listed phonemes of the Odia language and the pronunciation in the audio sample sounds more like [s] than [ɕ] or [ʃ]. As you also changed the English IPA of "Odisha", I might also mention that you should check what the source says if there is a source provided for the IPA pronunciation because the symbol in the [1] source mentions [s] in the pronunciation of "Odisha" and not [ʃ]. So in future, please do not change IPA symbols unless you have checked either the IPA Help page, the Phonology section of the language or the provided source for the IPA carefully as edits like what you did in the Odisha article could get reverted if it is incorrect and could risk getting you blocked from editing if it is considered disruptive. Many thanks. Broman178 (talk) 12:04, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank you. Nishānt Omm (talk) 07:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nishānt Omm. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

Nishānt Omm (talk) 11:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assamese alphabet

Thank you for your edits, but I have reverted them because you are using a transcription system which is even more obscure. Please use IPA instead, if you wish to change it. Chaipau (talk) 05:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your second alert that you should not be making substantial changes to Wikipedia without references and when there is no WP:CONSENSUS. Some of what you have inserted are incorrect. For example you have inserted: "the letter ক is itself ক ghô)". You obviously do not know the Assamese script itself, because this is a fundamental mistake. I notice that you are a new editor, so would like to point you to WP:PG, WP:MOS, and WP:LOP. Chaipau (talk) 06:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Un-vanished

As you have continued editing after being given a WP:Courtesy vanishing I have been obliged to rename your account back to its original name. Cabayi (talk) 06:32, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Papadam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sabzi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nishānt Omm (talk) 07:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Subhas Chandra Bose have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please note that the accompanying audio is that of Bose enunciating his name in English. The initial "s" is pronounced "sh." Fowler&fowler «Talk» 16:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bengali-Assamese script

Your recent edits [2] are unexplained and removes information. Please do not make such removals. Chaipau (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What important was written in those rows ? All I could see was blank. Nishānt Omm (talk) 11:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are Maithili variants. You probably do not have the fonts to see them. Chaipau (talk) 11:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you see them ? Nishānt Omm (talk) 14:40, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly you have removed citations on Yoga articles; and your edits have been without edit comments. Please take care always to supply edit comments, even if brief ("translit." would do fine IF that's all you're doing), and please do not remove reliable sources without consensus. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to see that you are continuing in the same conduct, e.g. at Paschimottanasana, and that you have not replied either. Could you please take note. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:27, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

अनुस्मारक: क्या आप कृपया अपने द्वारा किए गए प्रत्येक संपादन के लिए एक संपादन टिप्पणी (जैसे "Translit.") प्रदान कर सकते हैं। धन्यवाद। Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishānt Omm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know the reason why I've been blocked by someone for five months from editing in Wikipedia Nishānt Omm (talk) 02:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't either, because this account doesn't show as blocked. Are you getting a message that your IP address is blocked? — Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Nishānt Omm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Nishānt Omm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Not provided

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: If your IP address is blocked, you will need to tell us what it is so we can look into this. If you don't want to post your IP publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nishānt Omm (talk) 02:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm David Eppstein. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nishānt Omm (talk) 02:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain this?

[3], you have changed it to make no sense at all. This is clearly continuing the disruptive editing that ToBeFree blocked you for and you've resumed right after the block expired. I can't comment on the rest of your edits, but given this, I'm not sure anything you're doing here makes much sense and is just resulting in an unnecessary waste of volunteer time (combined with your calling reverts of your edits) as vandalism. —SpacemanSpiff 06:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My block was for repeatedly re-adding a 691x551px image of the Pi letter to the Pi article in the middle of the lead (1, 2, 3). That was obvious disruption to me. I sadly don't speak Hindi, but if I receive evidence of disruption similar to the one that led to the 2 week block, an indefinite one will of course follow. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for my edit Nishānt Omm (talk) 08:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made that edit as Inglisha (इंग्लिश) as different from Inglish इंग्लिश् without schwa at the end. Nishānt Omm (talk) 08:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think 1 schwa is deleted only i.e at the end. In Google translate English is translated to इंग्लिश (not इंग्लिश् or इंगलिश) Nishānt Omm (talk) 08:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(while I can't judge whether this is factually correct, I can at least say this does seem to be a good-faith contribution to me. Thank you very much for having taken the time to explain this.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you did made the sentence entirely meaningless, whether the transliteration is correct or not. Likewise, you added a pile of unsourced text and then you havebeen repeatedly adding it after removal, calling the removals as vandalism. That follows the same pattern as prior to your earlier block. —SpacemanSpiff 13:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But, it was deleted by unknown user. Nishānt Omm (talk) 13:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't matter. You added completely unsourced and unverified text, it was removed. Instead of justifying why adding that text is necessary, you have repeatedly called the removal vandalism and have edit warred to get it back in. —SpacemanSpiff 13:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My sincere apologies for what I have done. From now on I will establish consensus without doing edit warring. Nishānt Omm (talk) 14:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have reverted my edit Nishānt Omm (talk) 03:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at West Bengal, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:54, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I am a new editor, I don't knew that Nishānt Omm (talk) 14:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IPA for Bengali language

Hello, your recent edits in Bengali language have been undone because they are incorrect as per Help:IPA/Bengali and rules of Bengali pronunciation. For example, the letter অ has two pronunciation: ɔ in অমর and o in অধিকার, according to its expression of negation. Also in সমান, the letter স is used as a prefix and thus pronounced as ʃɔ, not ʃo. For reference, you can use automated IPA generator like https://ipa.bangla.gov.bd/. With regards — Meghmollar2017 (U T C) — 14:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nishānt Omm (talk) 15:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the IPA generator, It is written ʃɔman (not ʃoman). Nishānt Omm (talk) 04:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop inserting errors in Wikipedia

As you did here: [4]. Chaipau (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

মানুষ is correct spelling of the word. As far as I know, Indic languages use Sanskrit spelling. Nishānt Omm (talk) 13:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert edits without any proper discussion

Hi, please do not revert edits, especially when cited, without any prior discussion on the discussion page. Can you please explain what vandalism did I do and why you reverted? I have reverted your edits assuming good faith. Hopefully you don't continue more such edits without discussing properly. Psubhashish (talk) 13:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Your edit to Typing has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Firefangledfeathers 15:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't intentionally undo your revert. You were so fast. Nishānt Omm (talk) 15:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Potential energy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 17:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delhi

I've undone your edit in Delhi, which is a Muslim city, i.e. founded by Muslims (for all practical purposes), in which both Urdu and Khari boli Hindi (the basis of Standard Hindi) were born. After India's partition, Delhi lost two-thirds of its Muslim population to Punjabi-speaking refugees who had just arrived from the western Punjab region. Someone else added the three Indian pronunciations. I would have removed all three, but upon consideration of the linguistic history of Delhi, I let them stand. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 14:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend that you not attempt to edit war on Delhi and put words in my mouth in edit summaries. Go to the article's talk page and attempt to garner a consensus. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with WP:EDITWAR. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Careful with repeated wikilinks

Hi there, thanks for your edits, but please be aware of wp:REPEATLINK. With this edit, you added two wikilinks to article Velocity, which was already linked (twice). I removed three wikilinks, keeping the first occurrence only. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thankyou for informing about this. Nishānt Omm (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kinetic energy. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 11:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FuseSchool

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on FuseSchool, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Unbroken Chain (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English variations

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Dioptre, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. --Srleffler (talk) 01:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I apologise, I thought that US English is Standard variety of English in scientific articles. Nishānt Omm (talk) 02:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jñāna page move

While I personally have no strong objection to this page move, a few notes:

It is often advisable to propose/discuss moves of such longstanding articles on the article talk page before implementing them
The Jnana translation was not "incorrect" (see use on EB] etc) as your edit-summary suggested. It is just a common, arguably ambiguous, transliteration not based on a specified transliteration scheme
Speaking of which, whenever providing a transliteration (esp. one that uses diacritical characters) specify the transliteration scheme used so that the reader can, if they wish, look up how the symbols are to be read. For Sanskrit and Indic scripts the templates {{IAST}} and {{transl}} (with ISO code 15919) are often useful.

Hope that is of use in the future. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing.

Nishānt Omm (talk) 03:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chhau dance

Please do not move article unilaterally without discussion/RfC for move. The word Chhau is by far the WP:COMMONNAME in English. Also go through WP:TRANSLITERATE. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First you go through the section Inherent vowel for Odia, Bengali languages Nishānt Omm (talk) 14:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COMMONNAME in English trumps over native transliteration. Perhaps you need to read it properly as well as the supplement WP:TRANSLITERATE, which has an example → Nuremberg, Delicatessen, and Florence are used (as opposed to Nürnberg, Delikatessen, and Firenze, respectively. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must stop making undiscussed page moves

Your movement of Vimana was both undiscussed and wrong. Do this sort of thing again and don't be surprised if you get blocked. Doug Weller talk 07:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why wrong? Nishānt Omm (talk) 07:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It could be easily confused with Vamana which is different. Nishānt Omm (talk) 07:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The form Vimana without the diacritic is well established in English. More importantly, stop making undiscussed moves. You'll be blocked next time; you've been warned enough. Bishonen | tålk 07:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

If there is a real chance of confusion, use {{distinguish|Foo}} replacing "Foo" with the name of the article. Place this just above the lead. See Phobos (mythology) as an example. Doug Weller talk 08:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Doug Weller for informing me about this template. Nishānt Omm (talk) 15:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 08:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your last three edits, they are all completely wrong, and tipify the long-term problems with your editing that have been discussed extensively on your talk page. As a probable non-native English speaker (or, at the very least, an English speaker whose dialect is strongly influenced by languages very different from English), the fact that you even *think* you have the requisite knowledge to make changes to spelling and pronunciation like that (especially with the first edit, which discounts the pronunciation of many British English speakers as incorrect), shows phenomenal arrogance that is incompatible with editing Wikipedia. This edit is also extremely concerning, for reasons I explained. You are not welcome here. Graham87 08:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re the first example, I just realised that it's about syllable stress, not rhoticity ... it's still completely inappropriate for you to be messing with that sort of thing. Graham87 08:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this edit blatantly ignored this warning. Graham87 09:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishānt Omm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think the reasons given for blocking me aren't convincing enough.

I might be wrong but I didn't edit war.
I think the the blocking administrator needs to read Wikipedia:INDICSCRIPT section of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/India-related articles more carefully. The warning was only relevant to that discussion itself. It is clearly mentioned that "This avoidance of Indic scripts only applies to articles that are predominantly India-related and is excluded from, among others, articles about Hinduism, Buddhism, or any of India's neighbouring countries." The article for Prahlada is very much related to hinduism. So I didn't blatantly ignore this warning. Nishānt Omm (talk) 13:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for disruptive editing, not edit warring. Yamla (talk) 20:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Nishānt Omm:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishānt Omm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not repeat the following mistakes again: * I will stop making undiscussed page moves and will certainly not ignore this warning. * I will not disrupt edits and always fact check before and after making changes. * I will always adhere to Wikipedia editing guidelines and will always be responsible for the absolute accuracy of the information that I contribute. However, any inadvertent errors have to be reported to me as soon as possible.

Decline reason:

Sorry, too vague. You've not addressed the ways you were just plain wrong in your editing. Please review all the messages you've received and address the concerns laid before you. Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishānt Omm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You must have read all the previous disruption discussions before declining my request (･ั﹏･ั)

Decline reason:

This is not a cogent unblock request. SQL ^{Query Me!} 05:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nishānt Omm (talk) 06:41, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishānt Omm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I have done is totally wrong. Following are the instances where I was disrupting articles:

[5] [6] [7]
[8].

Please do unblock me if you feel I have repented on my disruption. Nishānt Omm (talk) 03:52, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't need you to repent, we just need you to tell us what specifically was disruptive about your editing, and what edits you plan to make instead that will not be disruptive. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Nishānt Omm:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishānt Omm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I have done is totally wrong. Following are the instances where I was disrupting articles: *[9] [10] [11] *[12]. I just did these edits thoughtless for which I sincerely regret. I plan to make useful contributions in future especially in Mathematics and Science articles with proper referencing.

Decline reason:

You conveniently picked the last three articles you edited. You haven't explained what you did wrong. Katie^talk 14:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nishānt Omm (talk) 09:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC) @331dot: Could you please review my unblock request again?Nishānt Omm (talk) 13:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:Please review my unblock request. I have a lot of useful contributions to make. Nishānt Omm (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've already reviewed a request by you, I cannot review another. It's out of my hands now. It may help you to offer an example of a specific, sourced contribution you would make. 331dot (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: I request you to inform an admin who may review and help me. Please Nishānt Omm (talk) 16:47, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have an open unblock request and administrators can see it. One will review it in due course; admins are volunteer working in their free time. Please be patient. You may use this time to improve your request. 331dot (talk) 16:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay... Nishānt Omm (talk) 17:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC) @Admin:[reply]

@Nishānt Omm:Nishānt Omm (talk) 07:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishānt Omm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please review my previous unblock request.

Decline reason:

See above. Katie^talk 14:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nishānt Omm (talk) 09:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nishant Omm:Nishānt Omm (talk) 03:14, 29 August 2022 (UTC) @Admin: Please, I request any admin to review my unblock request.[reply]

Help

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I need to demonstrate and confirm that I am willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia for my unblock,i.e, I need a 2nd chance. But I am unable to copy the portion of the prose from the article that I will be proposing changes to. Please any help me. Nishānt Omm (talk) 14:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've had multiple chances and you still can't or won't describe what you've done wrong and how you'll contribute positively in the future. I'm revoking your talk page access. You can use the Unblock Ticket Request System in the future, but be aware that they can and will block you there as well if you spam them like you spammed here today. Katie^talk 14:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Katie^talk 14:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]