Jump to content

User talk:Ninjabeard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ninjabeard! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 11:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Ninjabeard, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Ninjabeard! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ninjabeard (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello: I have been blocked for using multiple accounts.

I have never used multiple accounts or 'sockpuppeted', ever, on Wikipedia.

I have only ever used Ninjabeard as my login, perhaps I have sometimes forgot to log-on but that is all.

I am not Aestheticinfo, this user however is known to me, she has admitted doing the 'sockpuppeting' and she is a real person. We are separate people, and I cannot tell her what to do in this regard.

I did in fact openly disclose that we shared a network on my account page when I found out what she had been doing. This can be checked.

I can see how this looks from outside but I assure you I did not put "Gary Tedman" on Wikipedia, and I only found out about it when I searched online and saw the deletion notices. I did not enter into the debate on deletion and I agree about the deletion reasons. Yes I did of course read the debate and become interested in it. On the discussion, I thought it was crude, and did not reach consensus. But the reasons were valid (I said this to the person who deleted it on his talk page).

I have also never canvassed Aestheticinfo, ever, to have items included on Wikipedia, in fact the direct opposite, knowing that this kind of thing can happen.

Some additional info (27 Aug 2014): I think someone has deleted something from this page or the user page - it was a notification (with the logo thing) that I shared a network IP address with Aestheticinfo and a short explanation, made maybe a couple of weeks ago. This does not show up in the history either (it appears to me, I may be doing something wrong of course, or maybe this is how it is when blocked...). Ninjabeard (talk) 11:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I've discussed this with checkuser Risker, who had concluded "likely" at the SPI. I think your story is believable; it seems to me you understand the rules and have behaved correctly, and your colleague/family member/whatever has not. It might be a good idea if the two of you tried not to edit the same articles; that you both worked on Marxist aesthetics was the main source of the "likely" conclusion. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:42, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll do as you suggest. I'm still a fairly new to Wiki editing but I know the rules of blogging etc well enough and am quite experienced in IT. Ninjabeard (talk) 16:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Margaret Fay (September 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero Books (imprint) (September 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Origamiteⓣⓒ 17:44, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Margaret Fay has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Margaret Fay. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 12:33, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

[edit]

Hello, Ninjabeard! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 12:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Vere Hopgood (October 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Fiddle Faddle 15:44, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Ellis Bowlt has been accepted

[edit]
John Ellis Bowlt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

EBY (talk) 05:02, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero Books (imprint) (December 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hell in a Bucket was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Vere Hopgood

[edit]

Hello, Ninjabeard. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "John Vere Hopgood".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:John Vere Hopgood}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Margaret Fay

[edit]

Hello, Ninjabeard. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Margaret Fay".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Margaret Fay}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:54, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Zero Books (imprint) concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Zero Books (imprint), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zero Books (imprint)

[edit]

Hello, Ninjabeard. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Zero Books".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Zero Books (imprint)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:00, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Ellis Bowlt for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Ellis Bowlt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Ellis Bowlt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ninjabeard&oldid=1143197941"