User talk:Nikki brio1

Nikki brio1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nikki brio1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: G. Marius Clore (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 16:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: G. Marius Clore (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:G. Marius Clore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: G. Marius Clore (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:G. Marius Clore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 22:35, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for Clore article draft

Hi - I've forgotten now how I noticed your draft article Draft:G. Marius Clore, since I'm not involved with the Articles for Creation process, but I just saw that it's been declined several times now. Clore is clearly notable by Wikipedia standards for professors and academics, but currently the article reads too much like a CV. I suggest trimming the awards section and reducing the works section to only top-cited papers, with inclusion of some review papers written by others in the field that confirm the importance of Clore's work (should be easy to find). Compare the length and scope of the articles for Ad Bax or Axel Brunger. Opabinia regalis (talk) 22:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: G. Marius Clore (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Graeme Bartlett was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:G. Marius Clore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clore article accepted

G. Marius Clore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Congratulations! As you can see I did make a few edits to the formatting and referencing.

Now that the article is live, I have a suggestion for improving it. Most of our articles on scientists could be improved by citing more third-party review articles rather than many examples of the subject's own papers. This is a bit different than you'd think from academic norms. But on Wikipedia what makes someone "notable" is the fact that reliable sources have noticed them. Review articles published in the scientific literature by other people in the NMR field would fit.

And feel free to fill in the missing articles for some of the other NAS biophysicists! Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:17, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Photo of G. Marius Clore.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Photo of G. Marius Clore.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mlpearc (open channel) 06:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]