User talk:Nikil44

Welcome!

Hello, Nikil44, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 04:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re:Biblical inerrancy

It was a sloppy revert on my behalf. I apologize for that, and I have corrected the two things you pointed out. The reason for my revert was to remove the two sentences which did not have sources, and which seemed to me to be original research. You added commentary which worked to contradict a cited source, without supplying another comparable source. It seemed like you were saying you knew better than what our sources said. You can make a case on the talk page that the source is poor and we shouldn't cite it at all (and remove the content) or you can find another source and we can show both sides. But we can't take side, nor add unsourced commentary which acts to discredit a cited source. I hope you understand. Similarly, biblical interpretations also need to be backed up by sources. Sorry again for the sloppy revert, and in the future try to make sure all your contributions are backed by reliable, verifiable sources. -Andrew c ^[talk] 22:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

i appreciate your work on kejriwal.i can help too Harishrawat11 (talk) 16:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logical quotation marks

Hi Nikil44, I've reverted one of your edits to Prayer where you changed the position of quotation marks relative to other punctuation marks. Please note that the Wikipedia Manual of Style specifies that logical quotation marks should be used:

"On Wikipedia, place all punctuation marks inside the quotation marks if they are part of the quoted material and outside if they are not."

(Note that the preceding sentence was quoted in full, so in this case the punctuation mark does go inside the quotation marks.) Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I did not look at the Manual of Style but thought to make it consistent because the American usage of quotes was preferred in that article. I will take care of it from now on. Nikil44 (talk) 03:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A good copy editor is hard to find

Thank you for your edits! You're very helpful; have a cuppa. :) Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 08:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nikil44. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]