User talk:Nike4564
Welcome!
|
Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 page editing disagreement reply
[edit]Hello, thank you for taking the time to write. I started a thread on this exact topic on the talk page for the article (it got slightly derailed because I misread support for a separate question), but my explanation is there and it would be great to have another contributor to the conversation there, so please read over my explanation @ Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016#Superdelegate count and respond there. You can also respond on my talk page if you are not comfortable responding there.PotvinSux (talk) 03:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Your revert on Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016
[edit]Your edit summary puts it like I was breaking consistency, though the opposite is the case. Per longstanding practice we're creating articles on the individual primaries, see the individual articles in Category:Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries by state and its subcategories. While I did create the categories and most of the 2016 articles, this is not just my personal obsession.
Putting all the primary content into different kinds of overview articles such as the "Presidential elections in foo" articles wasn't a very good idea this year. Unsure if I should consider your revert another kind of "Thank you for all your work," but either way it wasn't helpful. --PanchoS (talk) 16:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Interim leader
[edit]There will hopefully be some clarity in the next few days, particularly since this situation is pretty much unprecedented, but my understanding was that the result of the leadership review vote was to essentially vacate the leader's position and hold a new leadership election but that the caucus has asked Mulcair to remain as interim leader until the election is held. Since the NDP constitution has suddenly disappeared from ndp.ca (it was there yesterday!) it's hard to be absolutely sure from a legalistic point of view but if the term "interim leader" is being used in the media then that's fair enough until we have something more authoritative. Electoralist (talk) 22:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Nike4564. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)