User talk:Nigelharper111

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nigelharper111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have you blocked me JohnCD as I am not a sock puppet of SebastainTorres, because he is one of my playersNigelharper111 (talk) 21:59, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Pretty much what John said below Jac16888 ^Talk 22:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It doesn't matter whether you are the same person or not, you are all editing with the same aim, to use Wikipedia as a host for your fantasy Formula 1 game, and in cases like this the policy is that "whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets". Why not go and find another site to host your game, and stop wasting our time? JohnCD (talk) 22:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Confirmed by CheckUser as a sock puppet of SebastainTorres (talk · contribs)/MerlisaJwAtts (talk · contribs). –MuZemike 22:19, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nigelharper111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It does matter who i am, you deleted my wycombe boys A.F.C page and I'm not happy

Decline reason:

And we're not happy that you (and, if you're telling the truth, your friends) are repeatedly trying to put your fantasy racing game on Wikipedia. So I guess we're even; now please stay away. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:07, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nigelharper111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No It doesnt make us even......... what do you fantasy racing game unblock now

Decline reason:

Sockpuppet or meatpuppet, one or the other. I can't see anyone independent reposting this stuff. If this goes on much more, a ban might be in order. Peridon (talk) 00:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nigelharper111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to be unblock at once JohnCD

Decline reason:

This block is not going to be lifted, as you've been explained multiple times, I'm sorry. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:07, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nigelharper111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock me please what do i have 2 to before i can edit again, I promise i wont make fake pages

Decline reason:

Sorry, I'm not seeing anything here to persuade me that its worth our while letting you loose again. As Jeremy says, blackmail doesn't work. Please stop posting unblocks now, you had it reviewed and you know the answer. Look art WP:OFFER and maybe come back in 3-6 months. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please, do not remove declined unblock requests. Per WP:BLANKING, you're not allowed to do that. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:46, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

if you unblock me i wont have 2

Administrators won't acquiesce to blackmail or threats, and odds are the next one to come by will revoke your talk page access. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 12:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just saying if you unblock me i wont have to keep writing on this page

So what sort of editing are you so desperate to do, if you're not going to do the stuff you were blocked for? Peridon (talk) 13:33, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formula One, Football...... anime etc good stuff

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nigelharper111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A) I'm not blackmailing you 2) Why should I come back in 3-6 months 3) My F1 is really look it up 4) whats wrong with wanting to be unblocked and even more this profile was created 4 weeks ago and its only just been block

Decline reason:

I see no attempts to address the multiple reasons for your block in points A), 2) or 4), and regarding 3) being real doesn't automatically satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines, something which I suggest you familiarise yourself with. I advise you to go away and think if you really want to be a serious contributor to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a content hosting service for your internet interests, it is an encyclopaedia. I suspect there are other sites out their far better suited to your intentions, however if after a long period of consideration you do want to return, perhaps under some sort of mentoring process, I advise you to utilise our email system for unblock requests. Due to the repeated lack of understanding demonstrated by these multiple requests here, I am revoking your talk page access. You were warned about that too. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 14:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.