User talk:Niddel

Hello Niddel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal (talk) 03:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

A lengthy welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 03:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thank you for your advice. I will try to make more detailed edit summaries in the future Niddel (talk) 22:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Gianluca De Ponti

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gianluca De Ponti, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What, exactly, are you doing?

Hello. Could you please explain what this is? Few if any of the sources you have cited support the attached statements, and many of them are completely unreliable. Are you generating articles with ChatGPT or something? Grayfell (talk) 11:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your time. I've seen the templates that were added to my first article and the problems they address. I was looking for some topics I'm both familiar with and which is both already covered on Wikipedia and leaves room for expansion. To me, this topic seemed one. Only later, after it was published and whole paragraphs were removed, I found out I got perplexed in my list of sources at some point of writing. I'll definitely need to correct the writing process in my future articles. Initially I read dozens of those to create a template of the future article and made a list with the sources where I attributed each, etc, etc. There were many steps but it doesn't matter since it didn't bring success I expected. And although this part of the issue is quite clear to me now, I don't understand still why the section with examples was removed? I know there were no sources but it's only because those applications have their own articles on Wikipedia. I only included those that have Niddel (talk) 23:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for responding. There are a lot of issues here.

First, please clarify that you are not using ChatGPT (or a similar service) and will not use it in the future for adding content to Wikipedia articles.
Please make sure every source you cite is a reliable source. In the Decentralized chatting application article, many sources were unreliable. At least one of them was to a predatory journal.
You also need to use reliable sources to define the topic, and to explain why it's different from related topics which already have articles. Please make sure every source says something specifically about "decentralized chatting applications" as a topic. Do not use sources which talk about decentralization but not chatting, or instant messaging but not decentralization, as this is WP:SYNTH.
I'm confused about why you focused on blockchain so much. The article mentions Signal, Tox, and Elements, but none of those use blockchain, and blockchain would not improve security.
As for the "popular" examples section, why those apps and not any of the dozens of others? Decentralized end-to-end encryption isn't a new feature for chatting programs, as Off-the-Record Messaging (for example) is decentralized and has been around since 2004. By listing examples without any source it looks like you are promoting those services. You also described them with promotional language, which is not appropriate. Please look at WP:NPOV and also WP:TONE

Do you understand these problems? Grayfell (talk) 05:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't use ChatGPT or any.. AI-tool? Then, I don't. I've read the whole article on predatory journals. This was very helpful in detecting them furtherly. As for the other problems you've mentioned, I understand those. Thank you. Niddel (talk) 09:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Thank you for clarifying about ChatGPT, I appreciate it.

The article Flipping is an my Watchlist, so I noticed that you have added a source to that article. However that source is not reliable. It appears to be the personal blog of someone named William C Spaulding, but self-published sources like blogs are not usually reliable sources. Please more carefully review reliable sources and be more cautious when adding sources. Remember that not everything you find on the internet is reliable, even if it looks reliable or seems factual or neutral. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 04:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Web chat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crisp. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for using any unreliable sources and I will do my best in increasing the quality of my sources in future. Thank you Niddel (talk) 11:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Niddel. Thank you for your work on Miquel Tarradell. 9H48F, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia! The article is lacking inline citations but it appears most information on Tarradell is in Spanish which I'm not fluent in. For now, I've tagged it as having an unclear citation style, in hopes that someone with more fluency can properly attribute the information in the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|9H48F}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

9H48F (talk) 16:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Decentralized chatting application

Hello, Niddel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Decentralized chatting application, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Decentralized chatting application

Hello, Niddel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Decentralized chatting application".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ScienceSoft USA Corporation

The article ScienceSoft USA Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

PROMO tone article for subject likely not meeting WP:ORGCRIT. Sources in article are a combination of WP:ROUTINE mentions, self-published sources (blogs etc) and database content. Search does not locate any WP:SIGCOV of the company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Triptothecottage (talk) 01:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ScienceSoft USA Corporation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ScienceSoft USA Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 03:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]